P
PLAL
Guest
We knew it was coming. The thirty day** public comment period** for removing conscience protection for health care workers began on March 6, 2009 and the clock is ticking. It is hard to believe that in America our doctors, nurses, pharmacists and religious hospitals would be forced to provide controversial services that conflict with their personal, moral and religious beliefs. One of President Bush’s last actions was to reinforce this traditional protection and many of us made use of the official website at that time to express our support for an action that should be a sacred right in our country.
PLEASE take the time to voice your objections to this assault on the religious liberties of our good and dedicated medical personnel. Your comments must be registered on the official website in order to be counted. It’s not enough to contact the White House. They have also made it more difficult by having certain guidelines that must be followed. Here is the website: www.proposedrescission@hhs.gov
According to the Proposed Rule comments should provide the following:
PLEASE take the time to voice your objections to this assault on the religious liberties of our good and dedicated medical personnel. Your comments must be registered on the official website in order to be counted. It’s not enough to contact the White House. They have also made it more difficult by having certain guidelines that must be followed. Here is the website: www.proposedrescission@hhs.gov
According to the Proposed Rule comments should provide the following:
- Information, including specific examples, where feasible, addressing the scope and nature of the problems giving rise to the need for federal rulemaking and how the current rule would resolve those problems.
- Information, including specific examples where feasible, supporting or refuting allegations that the December 19, 2008 final rule reduces access to information and health care services, particularly by low- income women.
- Comment on whether the December 19, 2008 final rule provides sufficient clarity to minimize the potential for harm resulting from any ambiguity and confusion that may exist because of the rule; and
- Comment on whether the objectives of the December 19, 2008 final rule might also be accomplished through non-regulatory means, such as outreach and education."