Please help! Was this a mortal sin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter timeandeternity
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

timeandeternity

Guest
I was baking a cake at my family’s house tonight, and had to add milk and eggs at one point. I know many of you will disagree with me on this, but I am very adamant in making sure my dairy and meat come from good sources, as I do try to practice good stewardship of my resources. No, I don’t pay crazy amounts for organic vegan food, and no I don’t get my information from crazies like PETA, but I do buy eggs and dairy that come from companies that do not unnecessarily harm the animals. So, I knew I was going to be using milk and eggs that almost definitely came from a harmful company. I just told myself, “Well, I won’t be paying for these, so it’s not a big deal,” in order to justify using them. However, I knew that the more I used them, the sooner my family would have to go out and buy yet another gallon of milk and another carton of eggs. I would thus be involved in that purchase at least indirectly because of my use of the milk and eggs.
I’m pretty sure this was a mortal sin because I ignored my conscience in something that I believe is grave (unnecessary abuse of natural resources–in this case, animals). I would appreciate any thoughts on this. However, please don’t just try to enter into yet another argument about factory farms and such. That’s not what this thread is about.
 
You need to be under the guidance of a holy priest who understands scrupuosity.
 
I understand that the essence of serious sin is that the person acts contrary to what his or her own conscience is telling him or her to do.

Yet, in this case, I would guess that your conscience was giving you a mixed message. On the one hand, you don’t want to participate in the unnecessary suffering of animals. On the other hand, you wanted to be be courteous to, charitable to, and gracious to, the human beings in this household where you were. You had rival and competing duties making claims on you.

So, I think when a person is truly getting mixed messages from his own conscience, the conditions for a mortal sin are not met.

To me, the solution would be to, in the future, avoid the mental and emotional pain of situations like this by planning ahead for likely contingencies that might put you in a difficult position.

I think that if a person is very often finding themselves in serious struggles over matters of conscience, this may be a sign that the person is approaching things in a dysfunctional manner in some way. In general, life is not supposed to be a constant struggle of conscience. That’s what I think, anyway. Life may not always be a picnic, but life can usually be fairly simple.

Of course, when a person dedicated to following his or her conscience is regularly associating with people with different values, or who simply don’t follow regularly their conscience, or who simply aren’t as sensitive to ethical issues, that can create an ongoing series of conflicts. I don’t know what the solution to that is.

Best wishes.
 
Bartolome, my conscience wasn’t really giving me mixed messages. I knew it was wrong to participate in the unjust treatment of animals, but I tried to tell myself that maybe this wasn’t such a big deal because I wasn’t actually paying for the eggs or milk. Also, I’ve heard that when dealing with serious sin, if you’re in doubt, err on the side of caution. So I suspect this circumstance was mortal, but I would also like to get second (and third and fourth etc) opinions on this.
 
I understand. I accept that you experienced no mixed messages from your conscience.

I suppose I was making an interpretation of your situation. I suppose I was speculating about unconscious or semi-conscious forces in your mind that may have prompted you to act against your conscience, or which allowed you to accept as an excuse something you immediately or later viewed as an inadequate justification.

Just for convenience sake of all in his forum, here is some of what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says about mortal sins:

*1857 For a sin to be mortal, three conditions must together be met: "Mortal sin is sin whose object is grave matter and which is also committed with full knowledge and deliberate consent."131

1858 Grave matter is specified by the Ten Commandments, corresponding to the answer of Jesus to the rich young man: "Do not kill, Do not commit adultery, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Do not defraud, Honor your father and your mother."132 The gravity of sins is more or less great: murder is graver than theft. One must also take into account who is wronged: violence against parents is in itself graver than violence against a stranger.*

vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p3s1c1a8.htm

I suppose some moral theologians might have some doubts about whether being a party to the suffering of animals in factory farms is “grave matter.” But, I understand your original post, you have no doubt about that. Thus, we are thrown, I think, into the whole domain of “conscience.”

From what I have studied about conscience in Catholic writings, this is an area that, in many ways, is not clearly defined. Among Catholic moral theologians I see lots of debate about many aspects of the issue of personal conscience as it applies to the issue of mortal sin that would merit eternal damnation.

Some Catholic moral theologians hold to the view that simultaneously meeting all three conditions of mortal sin is so hard to accomplish that mortal sin is a rare occurrence.

Other Catholic moral theologians take the view that the three conditions are pretty easy to meet, and so mortal sin is a common occurrence.

Others take a more moderate, intermediate position, or some other completely different approach.

I know of no way to resolve and reconcile these opposing views, except to say that God does not expect ordinary lay persons to be super experts in moral theology, but rather to exercise love of God, agape love for neighbor, and good will at all times as far as possible.

As such, I feel unable to reach any kind of firm conclusions by which to advise you in any definite way.

I do believe that virtually all Catholic priests and bishops you could consult on this matter would advise you that this act in question was not a mortal sin. But, of course, that does not necessarily settle the matter, since mortal sin as related to conscience has a deeply personal and private dimension that cannot be delegated to any other decision maker.

Sorry I can’t help you.

If I were you, I suppose I’d read the New Testament more, and read again all that the Catechism of the Catholic Church has to say about sin and about conscience, and would perhaps read some key documents on the Vatican web site that deal with the issue of conscience.

Also, if you can find a Catholic priest or monk whom you respect and trust, and who will consult with you on this and similar matters, that could be a blessing too. Jesus left us a Church to assist us and guide us. We don’t have to struggle with these matters all alone.

Best wishes.
 
Bartolome, my conscience wasn’t really giving me mixed messages. I knew it was wrong to participate in the unjust treatment of animals, but I tried to tell myself that maybe this wasn’t such a big deal because I wasn’t actually paying for the eggs or milk. Also, I’ve heard that when dealing with serious sin, if you’re in doubt, err on the side of caution. So I suspect this circumstance was mortal, but I would also like to get second (and third and fourth etc) opinions on this.
Everything you are saying is symptomatic of scrupulosity…do you consider yourself to be scrupulous? If so, then do yourself a BIG favor and begin to address the REAL problem—which has nothing to do with organic eggs and milk…

Refuse to relieve your anxiety by posting questions like this in a public forum. Put yourself under the guidance of a competent spiritual director and/or confessor who understands the nature of the disorder and can give you the appropriate counsel…

Getting a “second and third and fourth” opinion on the question you’ve posed is not what you need and in the long run will actually do you more harm than good…
 
If you thought what you were about to do did was, or could be, a mortal sin and decided to do it anyway, then talk with a confessor. Objectively, using such products might not constitute grave matter (I don’t really know) … but you thought that it could possibly be a mortal sin to use these products, right? … and so this is why you should speak with a confessor. Or did you think that what you were about to do wasn’t a motal sin because you didn’t pay for it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top