Please Help With The Criteria for Moral Action and Absolute Morality

  • Thread starter Thread starter ethereality
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

ethereality

Guest
I’ve been speaking with a Unitarian Universalist who argues that “morality is relative” and “based on whatever the society decides”. I thought it would be helpful for her to study the criteria for evaluating the morality of any given action, in order to obtain a better appreciation for the unchanging nature of morality (e.g. murder is always wrong; taking what is not rightfully yours is always wrong, etc).

I thought there was an article here at catholic.com discussing these criteria; d’you know to what I refer? I think the criteria are (roughly speaking) i) the motive behind the action, ii) the end consequence of the action, iii) the means for bringing about the end consequences.

Please help me find an article online discussing these matters; I would suppose Jimmy Akin would have it on his site, but couldn’t find an easy way to search or find it there, if it’s there.
 
A good starting point is this article - True Morality is Based On Objectivity.

Quoting from the article, it tells us about moral relativism:* What they say in the concrete in that any act, no matter what it is – stealing, adultery, fornication, murder, terrorism – can be just and good depending on the intention of the perpetrator and the circumstances of the act. *
What it tells us about an objective moral order is that: *The Catholic Church has consistently and continually rejected subjectivism and relativism in morality. *

Catholic teaching about morality is based on Natural Law. A good reading of the historical and philosophical development of the Natural Law is a pre-requisite for an understanding of the objectivity of morality. Subjectivist morality virtually means that morality is contingent upon human desires and their context, or, in other words, is arbitrary.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top