Please help :)

  • Thread starter Thread starter John_Augustine
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

John_Augustine

Guest
I’m leaving the Church of England in search of (little “o”) orthodox Christianity. I’m finding it really hard to choose between Catholicism and Eastern Orthdoxy. I also have some pro-protestant sympathies with regard to sola-fide (pretty much as per Pope Benedict’s words on Martin Luther a few days ago). Please could people advise me on the truths and shortcomings of each. Just so you know, although there is a Greek Orthodox archdiocese in the UK, it is very small, and if I were to become an Orthodox Christian, I would only have access to the Liturgy about once a month.

Thanks folks 🙂
 
😦 to only being able to go to the Divine Liturgy once a month if you become Orthodox. I don’t know if you will have to make more of an attempt, but, I bet whatever you decide, you will make an effort to get to the Divine Liturgy whenever you can.

What has led you to discover the Apostolic Traditions and why have you narrowed it down to these two?..and, did you ask the same question on an Orthodox forum?

The Truths of each is that they both have seven valid sacraments. Jesus is truly present in both.

The Short coming of the Orthodox Church is they have been stagnant since the 11th Century because they do not have the authority to hold councils with the guidance of the Holy Spirit. While they have beautiful liturgies and practices and traditions, none of it has been updated for one thousand years and one will be hard pressed to find intellectual answers to questions…at least that has been my case…with people on this forum. Also, to get accurate information on the Orthodox, one has to, apparently, talk to an Orthodox priest. There are no books that definitively could answer correctly about Orthodoxy; the Orthodox Church does not have a stamp of approval of what is true doctrine as far as judging books. Also, not that this will concern you, but, the Orthodox Church(es) are not universal, but rather, ethnic (mostly).

The Catholic Church believes that we have the Holy Spirit, so, what may look like inventions, are actually definitions/clarifications. We are universal – the world knows who we are. Because of this, it’s easy to attack us; it’s like throwing a projectile at the side of the Taj Mahal. It’s an easy target because it’s so big, and while some damage may be done, it’s not going away any time soon. ROGUE PRIESTS!!! Where as Orthodoxy may have all who love her serve her, the Catholic Church, has been infiltrated by communists, athiests, and other people who do not love God. They have become priests, bishops, etc. and have caused confusion and disorder within the Church. Each individual Catholic Church within a diocese may teach something different…which is not the point. Though priests may teach harasy, rest assured that the Church never propegates such false calamities.
 
What is preventing you from choosing the Catholic faith? Are there any reasons why you would want to become Orthodox as opposed to Catholic?
 
Hve you considered one of the eastern catholic rites? If you enjoy the EO divine liturgy but want to be catholic, then these rites are probably the best to look into.
 
Hve you considered one of the eastern catholic rites? If you enjoy the EO divine liturgy but want to be catholic, then these rites are probably the best to look into.
Sadly there are even fewer ECs in the UK, and most are in London…
 
What is preventing you from choosing the Catholic faith? Are there any reasons why you would want to become Orthodox as opposed to Catholic?
Papal Infallibility vis a vis the Infallibility of the whole Church is a problem for me. I need to pray about it 🙂
 
You should become a Catholic for this reason:

The Catholic Church is the Church founded by Christ. All other Christian Churches broke away from the Catholic Church. The Eastern Orthodox left in 1054 and the Protestants left during the Reformation.

The true Church of Christ is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic.

The Church is one: The entire Church is united under the leadership of the Successor of St. Peter, the Bishop of Rome. The Catholic Church, throughout the world, professes one faith with one voice. The Catholic Church teaches the full, complete faith of the Apostles throughout the entire world. The Catholic Church is undivided; it is not a collection of independent churches, rather, it is one single Church throughout the entire world.

The Orthodox communion is not one, undivided institution. It is a collection of Churches with no universally recognized leadership. The various Orthodox Churches throughout the world are not all in communion with each other, in the same way that every Catholic parish in the world is in communion with Rome. The Orthodox communion is a collection of independent, national Churches in loose communication with each other. The Orthodox communion possesses a fractured unity, wereas the Catholic Church is strongly united under the leadership of the Pope.

The Church is holy: I am not going to argue that the Catholic Church is holier than the Orthodox Church because both Churches are very holy, and both have sinners within their ranks. However, I will say that the Catholic Church continues to recognize the holiness of it’s members by canonising Saints. To my knowledge, the Catholic Church is the only Church which continues to proclaim universally recognized Saints. The Catholic Church continues to exercise the authority of the Apostles in this manner.

The Church is catholic: Catholic means “universal.” The Catholic Church is the largest Christian denomination in the world with one billion members. The Catholic Church has obeyed Christ and made disciples of all nations, and continues to do so. The Catholic Church embraces all cultures; this is evidenced by the many different rites within the Catholic Church, each with their own cultural traditions and liturgies.

The Orthodox Church is much smaller than the Catholic Church and does not boast members from every single continent and country. The Catholic Church is truly universal, wereas the Orthodox Churches are limited mainly to a few different nationalities and ethnicities. This is proven by the fact that you will have to attend a Greek Orthodox Church despite being British. The Catholic Church was the first establised Church in the British Isles, wereas the Orthodox Church is relatively new within the UK.

The Church is Apostolic: The Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches both have Apostolic Succession. However, the Orthodox Church does not have a recognized leader who is able to exercise Apostolic authority when deciding doctrine or resolving Church governance issues. The fact that the Orthodox have no leader is evidenced by the fact that they haven’t had an ecumenical council in centuries. There is no practical way that Orthodox can settle disputes among themselves, proclaim doctrines that are binding on all members, or convene or agree upon an ecumenical council.
 
The Catholic Church, has been infiltrated by communists, athiests, and other people who do not love God. They have become priests, bishops, etc. and have caused confusion and disorder within the Church.
The Catholic Church is not perfect, but you will find many good, holy, friendly people within it’s ranks. You will become a member of a family that has existed for 2000 years. We are all striving towards the common goal, and we all help each other. Christ is our salvation and our strength, and the Church helps us to become more like him.
 
John,

One of the great things about the Catholic Church is that it’s teachings will never change. The Catholic Church will never reverse it’s teachings regarding homosexuality and female ordination precisely because of Papal Infallability. The controversies that have plagued the Church of England will never happen in the Catholic Church. We have our share of liberals, but they will never change anything. We have the promise of Christ that the gates of Hell will never prevail - they may try, but they will never win. I mention this because I know many Anglicans have struggled to cope with the changes in the Church of England.

The Papacy ensures that the Church remains united in matters of faith and morals. The Pope, guided by the Holy Spirit, is prevented from erring in matters of faith and morals. This is why the Catholic Church has never, ever changed it’s doctrines, even though many would love them to do so. As a Catholic, I am secure in the knowledge that Magisterium will protect and defend the Sacred Deposit of Faith until the end of time. The Catholic Church is the constant defender of the Apostolic Faith.

The Orthodox Church has been in a state of flux since 1054. The Orthodox Church does not have the authority to universally defend and expound on the Sacred Deposit of Faith. No Bishop of the Orthodox faith and stand and settle disputes among the other Bishops and be universally accepted by all. The various Orthodox Churches can decide for themselves what to teach because they do not have to answer to any authorities.

The Catholic Church has continued to define, and declare dogmas in order to enable the faithful to better understand the faith. Throughout the centuries our understanding of the Sacred Deposit of Faith has continued to grow, and it has enabled us to further appreciate the redemptive work of Christ. The Magisterium have made sure to define and infallably declare doctrines in order to clarify the truths of the faith. The Orthodox have been unable to do the same because they have rejected the divinely instituted leadership of the Bishop of Rome. History has shown that Rome continues to exercise the authority given to the Apostles - it continues to use the power of the Keys to the Kingdom of Heaven in order to bind and loose. The Orthodox Church does not, and the fact that they have never called an ecumenical council or declared dogmas proves this.
 
I’m leaving the Church of England in search of (little “o”) orthodox Christianity. I’m finding it really hard to choose between Catholicism and Eastern Orthdoxy. I also have some pro-protestant sympathies with regard to sola-fide (pretty much as per Pope Benedict’s words on Martin Luther a few days ago). Please could people advise me on the truths and shortcomings of each. Just so you know, although there is a Greek Orthodox archdiocese in the UK, it is very small, and if I were to become an Orthodox Christian, I would only have access to the Liturgy about once a month.

Thanks folks 🙂
John Augustine,

I’m an Evangelical Protestant currently looking into the claims of the Roman Catholic Church but I have spent some time in the past looking into the Eastern Orthodox Church. Here are some of my thoughts.

Prior to my enquiry into Orthodoxy, I had supposed that the Eastern Orthodox Church would have considered itself nearer to Roman Catholicism than to Protestantism. It isn’t necessarily so. Within Orthodoxy, the pope has been referred to as “the first Protestant.” The Eastern Orthodox Church regards Roman Catholicism and Protestantism as different sides of the same (bad) coin.

As far as structure is concerned, the Eastern Orthodox Church seems to me to be closer to Roman Catholicism than it is to Protestantism in that Orthodox Christians, like Catholics, view ultimate Authority as being in the Church rather than in the Bible. However, there is no equivalent of the papacy in Orthodoxy. Instead they have a senior Patriarch who is called the “first among equals.” In Orthodoxy, then, there is no such thing as papal infallibility.

The Eastern Orthodox Church is sometimes called the Church of the Seven Councils since Orthodoxy endorses only the first seven of the twenty-one Ecumenical Councils. Therefore the Eastern Orthodox Church does not subscribe to the doctrines that have been developed in the West since the Schism of 1054, e.g. the doctrine of purgatory, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception and papal infallibility. I was unable to get a definitive answer as to the Orthodox view of the doctrine of the Assumption. It apparently depends upon whom one asks.

Surprisingly, despite the fact that Orthodoxy declares purgatory to be an imaginary place, Orthodox Christians still pray for the dead. One priest I asked about this told me that they did this because they’d always done it.

Fair enough, I thought. People vote for conservatives using the same logic.

The Orthodox understanding of salvation is similar to the Roman Catholic one. In Orthodoxy, it is a gradual process called theosis that takes place over the period of a person’s life with no assurance as to the final outcome.

Like the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church teaches that there are seven sacraments. However, the sacrament that Catholics called Confirmation is called Chrismation by Orthodox Christians.

The Divine Liturgy, which I’ve attended in English, is ethereal. It’s certainly a million miles from the sort of egotistical antics we Protestants who reside Stateside have come to expect to be foisted on us by our “worship leaders” who’ve allowed the remnant of aging guitar players surplus from the late sixties and early seventies who weren’t good enough to turn professional to harass us every Sunday morning with torrid tunes and lackluster lyrics.

I don’t know what goes on at a Mass but if it’s been taken over by this same crowd, then you may rest assured that Orthodoxy has the monopoly on beautiful worship.

I decided against Orthodoxy for two reasons.

Firstly, it has a problem with ethnic snobbery, which in turn has led to difficulties with unity (google the word “phyletism” to discover more about the problem). It’s impossible for me to believe that Orthodox Christians are united over doctrine when it’s clear that they can’t even agree about who is in charge of what based on the ethnicity of the individuals concerned.

Secondly, the Eastern Orthodox Church sees error in the West in terms of the way westerners think (apparently westerners ask too many questions which is annoying to the eastern mindset which defaults to the notion that many things should be taken on faith). That’s not an approach to which I’m particularly drawn.

Incidentally, the Eastern Orthodox Church has singled out your famous namesake, Saint Augustine, as the individual responsible for unduly and negatively influencing western thought.

A book that I found helpful is “Orthodoxy for the non–Orthodox” by John Garvey. And Ancient Faith Radio broadcasts very engaging and informative podcasts:

ancientfaith.com/

However, as you’ve already entered into a Catholic forum, it seems to me that you might as well continue to check out the Catholic Church. And if you find yourself faced with insurmountable difficulties, only then turn to face east.

But, most importantly, I would encourage you to pray to the Lord for guidance as you proceed on your spiritual journey.

Grace and peace,
Mick
👍
 
I’m leaving the Church of England in search of (little “o”) orthodox Christianity. I’m finding it really hard to choose between Catholicism and Eastern Orthdoxy. I also have some pro-protestant sympathies with regard to sola-fide (pretty much as per Pope Benedict’s words on Martin Luther a few days ago). Please could people advise me on the truths and shortcomings of each. Just so you know, although there is a Greek Orthodox archdiocese in the UK, it is very small, and if I were to become an Orthodox Christian, I would only have access to the Liturgy about once a month.
Early on in my reversion to Christianity I had strong interests in Orthodoxy. Ultimately the reality of the Papacy proved too formidable to be denied.

As for sola fide, your belief may not be so far off from the Catholic one. It all depends on how “faith” is understood. St Paul taught faith as total adherence to God, not simply a confidence in Jesus’ Merits stemming from the Cross.
 
The Orthodox don’t believe in infallibility as a concept ?
It isn’t very clear. Some have taught that Ecumenical Councils are infallible while some have also included Pan-Orthodox Council decisions as well. A number of Orthodox hold that a council is only infallible if the church as a whole accepts its decision(s). That would include lay people as well…
John Augustine,

The Eastern Orthodox Church is sometimes called the Church of the Seven Councils since Orthodoxy endorses only the first seven of the twenty-one Ecumenical Councils. Therefore the Eastern Orthodox Church does not subscribe to the doctrines that have been developed in the West since the Schism of 1054, e.g. the doctrine of purgatory, the doctrine of the Immaculate Conception and papal infallibility. I was unable to get a definitive answer as to the Orthodox view of the doctrine of the Assumption. It apparently depends upon whom one asks.
Unfortunately, even the teaching that the ecumenical councils number seven is not universal. Many Church theologians (and documents) speak of there being eight, while a few individuals extend this number to as many as thirteen. This is mainly due to the fact that there is no standard definition of what makes a council “ecumenical.”
Surprisingly, despite the fact that Orthodoxy declares purgatory to be an imaginary place, Orthodox Christians still pray for the dead. One priest I asked about this told me that they did this because they’d always done it.
Purgatory is almost always rejected as a term (I have heard an Orthodox individual use it once and affirm it), but the concept is a theologumenon (theological speculation or opinion). The existence of some sort of place/state of transition into Heaven is generally accepted; however, the belief in a fiery place is not.
Firstly, it has a problem with ethnic snobbery, which in turn has led to difficulties with unity (google the word “phyletism” to discover more about the problem). It’s impossible for me to believe that Orthodox Christians are united over doctrine when it’s clear that they can’t even agree about who is in charge of what based on the ethnicity of the individuals concerned.
Secondly, the Eastern Orthodox Church sees error in the West in terms of the way westerners think (apparently westerners ask too many questions which is annoying to the eastern mindset which defaults to the notion that many things should be taken on faith). That’s not an approach to which I’m particularly drawn.
I agree with these statements, though the latter paragraph is true to some degree within the Eastern Catholic churches aswell…

The previous statement is a problem, but should not be a reason to reject Orthodoxy. The world situation and ecclesialogical setup of the Orthodox churches make it difficult to hold councils. This was especially true during the Communist reign in Central and Eastern Europe as well as Asia.
Incidentally, the Eastern Orthodox Church has singled out your famous namesake, Saint Augustine, as the individual responsible for unduly and negatively influencing western thought.
Unfortunately, this is common in an Orthodox presentation against Western Christianity. Before the 16th century; however, I don’t believe many clerics in the East read Augustine’s writings since they were written in Latin only. In that case, Augustine wasn’t the problem, but the Western ideas and thoughts were. While Augustine is a major Western thinker, this view does not hold up too well under scrutiny. Western thinking is simply different than Greek or Persian or Coptic, etc…

Prayers and petitions,
Alexius:cool:
 
It isn’t very clear. Some have taught that Ecumenical Councils are infallible while some have also included Pan-Orthodox Council decisions as well. A number of Orthodox hold that a council is only infallible if the church as a whole accepts its decision(s). That would include lay people as well…

ah ok so the concept is believed. Methink they believe the pope does not have “exclusivity” or something?
 
Unfortunately, even the teaching that the ecumenical councils number seven is not universal. Many Church theologians (and documents) speak of there being eight, while a few individuals extend this number to as many as thirteen. This is mainly due to the fact that there is no standard definition of what makes a council “ecumenical.”
One of the main problems with Orthodoxy is that lacks an authoritative leadership that is responsible for defining and declaring what the Orthodox believe. This is why they can’t even decide how many of the Ecumenical Councils they accept. The teaching of the Catholic Church is very clear, and everybody is able to find out exactly what the Church believes. We have 2000 years of Church documents detailing every element of the Faith. And we have the Catechism which anybody can read in order to see what the Church teaches and believes. It is difficult to find out what is universally accepted by the Orthodox because there is so much disagreement among them. There is no Orthodox Catechism that is easily accessable as a means of discovering the Orhodox faith. There are no Orthodox Encyclicals, or any Orthodox ex catedra statements. Only the Catholic Church has consistently evangelised and taught the faith constantly since the beginning. The Catholic Church has clearly set out what she teaches before the entire world, and nobody can say that the Church fails in it’s mission to teach the faith.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top