J
JRKH
Guest
I’m referring to Mt 22:36-40 where the two great commandments are give as Loving God above all else, and Love neighbor as yourself.““One commits venial sin when, in a less serious matter, he does not observe the standard prescribed by the moral law…”(CCC 1862)
And since the two great commandments form the most basic standard of moral law, when we do unto others what we do NOT want them doing to us…we have sinned.”
I’m guessing you mean “Love one another” and “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” as the two commandments you’re referring to right?
The so called “golden rule” is a restatement of the second of the great commands of Love.
The key term in the above is “private”. How do you want others to treat YOUR Private things. To treat others things differently is to violate the second great command.I don’t see how looking at someones private information means you’re not loving them.
If something is sinful it remains a sin regardless of the outcome.In fact, I’m guessing the student now loves his professor much more.
Tit-for-tat does not apply. The professor has no more right to know the OP’s feelings than the OP had rights to invade the Prof’s privacy…However, I’m guessing that he would not want the professor to know his feelings about him that he expressed in this posting, so in the second commandment, the professor now has the right to know what the student had thought of him prior to this incident.
Bingo…Ya know what, I’m just going to say that since everyone else thinks it is a sin, I guess it is a sin too. I wouldn’t feel comfortable with someone looking through my information to see if I had done something wrong, although I also wouldn’t consider their actions a sin.
Invading another person’s privacy is wrong - ergo it’s a sin - it may not be a mortal sin (depending upon the intent) - but it is a sin…
Unless you can show me some church teaching that nullifies the evidence I have provided.
Peace
James