Poland to probe if Teletubbies are gay

  • Thread starter Thread starter WanderAimlessly
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It disguts me how people, especially catholics ridicule the Polish nation, for trying to condemn the promotion of homosexuality. People call them “homo-phobic”, i call them “disciples of Christ”.

Remember where the late John Paul II came from, remember where his views came from, where he grew in faith, or even St. Faustina

Mathew (5.11-12) Happy are you when people insult you and persecute you and tell all kinds of lies against you because you are my followers. Be happy and glad, for a great reward is kept for you in heaven.
 
pawel15 said:
It disguts me how people, especially catholics ridicule the Polish nation, for trying to condemn the promotion of homosexuality. People call them “homo-phobic”, i call them “disciples of Christ”.
Click to expand...
‘Disciples of Paul’, perhaps. The Christ, as far as I can recall, taught nothing on the subject, and the Levitic Law was replaced with Jesus’ two commandments.
 
Mirdath said:
‘Disciples of Paul’, perhaps. The Christ, as far as I can recall, taught nothing on the subject, and the Levitic Law was replaced with Jesus’ two commandments.
Click to expand...
Disciples of Paul can be used as just as well, but Christ did know about the destruction of Sodom and Gommorah,

St. Paul was a great man who knew well the teachings of the gospels, so if Jesus himself appeared to him and converted him. Then we must see that the holy Spirit had to have spoken through St.Paul. So this would mean the horrible sins homosexuals commit are offensive not only St. Paul but also to Jesus.

Jesus never had to talk about homosexuals becasue people already knew about how sinfull it was and how much God hated it, this is evident in the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.

God Bless
 
pawel15 said:
Jesus never had to talk about homosexuals becasue people already knew about how sinfull it was and how much God hated it, this is evident in the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Click to expand...
The people of Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed for being homosexual, but for being, well, a bunch of indiscriminate rapists. Note how they weren’t the ones complaining when Lot offered his daughters instead of the male visitors.

Anyway, we’re getting away from the original topic… wherefore Tinky-Winky?
 
Mirdath said:
The people of Sodom and Gomorrah were not destroyed for being homosexual, but for being, well, a bunch of indiscriminate rapists. Note how they weren’t the ones complaining when Lot offered his daughters instead of the male visitors.
Click to expand...
Tell me, what is your opinion of homosexuality?

Is it love? (i wholeheartily dissagree), or is it a perverted act which is also a selfish act becasue a homosexual only seeks out to please his sexual desires but does not want to love?

Now choose or keep praying and maybe God will give you the answer.
 
Mirdath said:
‘Disciples of Paul’, perhaps. The Christ, as far as I can recall, taught nothing on the subject, and the Levitic Law was replaced with Jesus’ two commandments.
Click to expand...
The above is every bit as ridiculous as wondering about the sexual preferences of Teletubbies.

The Christ is God Incarnate. He is the same God who spoke to Moses and Paul, and He is the same God that unequivocally condemns homosexuality everywhere the subject comes up in Scripture. Oh, and to once again put to bed the lie that Falwell was somehow responsible for “outing” Tinky Winky, here’s an oldie but goodie from John Neuhaus:
If, as the current liberal line has it, conservatives are neo-Puritans, the Rev. Jerry Falwell is the witch-burning, gay-bashing genuine article without the prefix. Remember the media flurry over his allegedly having “outed” a cartoon character in a popular television show? Says the Rev. Falwell, “I have never watched the Teletubbies on television. Until the recent media explosion accusing me of ’outing’ Tinky Winky as being gay, I had never heard of this sweet-looking character. I certainly never criticized Tinky Winky in any way.” So what happened? A magazine of which Falwell is the publisher quoted, accurately, statements by Time and People magazines, as well as the Washington Post, saying that Tinky Winky is a gay figure and represents the cultural mainlining of homosexuality. The same publications, plus many others, then had a journalistic picnic ridiculing the Rev. Falwell for saying that Tinky Winky is a gay figure representing the cultural mainlining of homosexuality, which of course he did not say. The charitable interpretation is that the editors of Time, People, the Washington Post, et al. do not read their own publications, for which they may be readily forgiven. The reality is that, when it comes to bashing conservative Christians, the facts don’t matter. But then, you probably already knew that.-- Mark L. Chance.
 
pawel15 said:
Tell me, what is your opinion of homosexuality?
Click to expand...
I’m all for it.
Is it love? (i wholeheartily dissagree), or is it a perverted act which is also a selfish act becasue a homosexual only seeks out to please his sexual desires but does not want to love?
Click to expand...
It’s love. Sex is not just about making babies. To accuse the other-than-straight of being unable or unwilling to love is to call us subhuman.

mlchance: I say that because Jesus simply didn’t seem to care about all that. Many Catholic moral teachings seem to me to be much more a result of Paul’s influence than Jesus’.
 
Presenting a “genderless” show to children does have its ramifications. As a parent I did not allow the kids to watch the tubbies. Since the tubbies are portrayed as “genderless” the kids cannot determine which are boys and which are girls. Who should wear the skirt or the pants?
 
DobleGG said:
Presenting a “genderless” show to children does have its ramifications. As a parent I did not allow the kids to watch the tubbies. Since the tubbies are portrayed as “genderless” the kids cannot determine which are boys and which are girls. Who should wear the skirt or the pants?
Click to expand...
Isn’t that a little young to start imposing gender roles? Where toddlers are concerned, why should sexuality even be a question?
 
Mirdath said:
Isn’t that a little young to start imposing gender roles? Where toddlers are concerned, why should sexuality even be a question?
Click to expand...
It probably shouldn’t – the Teletubbies are only supposed to be one or two years old! They don’t wear either skirts or pants; they all wear footie pajamas. 🙂 They aren’t actually genderless; Tinky-Winky and Dipsy are males, and LaLa and Po are females. They aren’t supposed to be humans, either (amazing what you can find out reading the various FAQs. 😉 )
 
Mirdath said:
‘Disciples of Paul’, perhaps. The Christ, as far as I can recall, taught nothing on the subject, and the Levitic Law was replaced with Jesus’ two commandments.
Click to expand...
“Think not that I have come to remove the law and the Prophets.” Furthermore, the Council of Jerusalem addresses the topic on point requiring that gentile converts keep those parts of the law related to sexual morality. Yeah, you’ve really studied Christianity and understand it well.
 
Mirdath said:
I’m all for it.

It’s love. Sex is not just about making babies. To accuse the other-than-straight of being unable or unwilling to love is to call us subhuman.

mlchance: I say that because Jesus simply didn’t seem to care about all that. Many Catholic moral teachings seem to me to be much more a result of Paul’s influence than Jesus’.
Click to expand...
The word ‘love’ is so cheap these days, you can use the word with anything.

But as for homosexuals to love each other, this lie can only come from Satan, because i can bet he practises this act himself as to ridecule Gods plan for human sexuality.

Homosexual love is a brick wall, it can go no deeper than their lust for sexual desire. Homosexuality can be cured, whereas heterosexuals can not.

Have you ever wondered why animals themselves can only mate when their is a ‘male’ and ‘female’ involved. Anything else an animal does only comes from sexual impulses and from intinct, no ‘love’ involved. So in reality homosexuals have degraded themselved as low as animals ,becasue of the way they act on their sexual impulses and not from love.

Remember what the Son of Man said, “whoever is not with me, is against me.”
So whoever is aginst the teachings of the bible is infact against the teachings of Jesus. So homosexuals are agianst God himself.
 
pawel15 said:
But as for homosexuals to love each other, this lie can only come from Satan, because i can bet he practises this act himself as to ridecule Gods plan for human sexuality.
Click to expand...
How about you talk about homosexual ability to love once you’ve tried it? It’s not a brick wall, it’s not mere lust. Sex is only one expression of love.
Have you ever wondered why animals themselves can only mate when their is a ‘male’ and ‘female’ involved. Anything else an animal does only comes from sexual impulses and from intinct, no ‘love’ involved. So in reality homosexuals have degraded themselved as low as animals ,becasue of the way they act on their sexual impulses and not from love.
Click to expand...
Animal homosexuality is a well-documented and common phenomenon.
 
pawel15 said:
The word ‘love’ is so cheap these days, you can use the word with anything.

But as for homosexuals to love each other, this lie can only come from Satan, because i can bet he practises this act himself as to ridecule Gods plan for human sexuality.

Homosexual love is a brick wall, it can go no deeper than their lust for sexual desire. Homosexuality can be cured, whereas heterosexuals can not.

Have you ever wondered why animals themselves can only mate when their is a ‘male’ and ‘female’ involved. Anything else an animal does only comes from sexual impulses and from intinct, no ‘love’ involved. So in reality homosexuals have degraded themselved as low as animals ,becasue of the way they act on their sexual impulses and not from love.

Remember what the Son of Man said, “whoever is not with me, is against me.”
So whoever is aginst the teachings of the bible is infact against the teachings of Jesus. So homosexuals are agianst God himself.
Click to expand...
Only those who are having sex. Homosexuals, defined as those with same sex attraction, are not against God and same sex attraction is not always curable.
 
Mirdath said:
Isn’t that a little young to start imposing gender roles? Where toddlers are concerned, why should sexuality even be a question?
Click to expand...
You don’t have to teach children gender roles. I have four children, two boys and two girls. They seemed to have their gender hardwired into their brains. I don’t think that seeing some strange, alien looking creature carrying a purse is going to suddenly make my sons’ homosexual.
 
goofyjim said:
The Teletubbies aren’t gay. They are harmless little creatures.😛
Click to expand...
they are scary, litte creatures. If I was homosexual, I’d be offended that anyone considered such strange things to be representative of my life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top