Polka Mass
Question from david burns on 12-06-2004: What’s the real deal on the so-called Polka Mass? Is it licit, profane, reprobate, advised, ill-advised, never proper, accepted, etc, and why, please. Thank you
Answer by Colin B. Donovan, STL on 12-16-2004: It is entirely profane and therefore illicit, as are Jazz Masses, Clown Masses, and everything of like stupidity. GIRM 41. All other things being equal, Gregorian chant holds pride of place because it is proper to the Roman Liturgy. Other types of sacred music, in particular polyphony, are in no way excluded, provided that they correspond to the spirit of the liturgical action and that they foster the participation of all the faithful.
Polka Mass
Question from dave burns on 12-16-2004: I forgot to mention that the Holy Father blessed Father ____ and his musicians and thoroughly enjoyed a Polka Mass from the High Altar at St. Peter’s. How does this square with current thinking? JP II told them VERRRY GOOOOD!
Answer by Colin B. Donovan, STL on 12-23-2004: Sorry, I can’t take your “facts” at face value. Something is wrong with your tale. I lived in Rome for 4 years. Not once did a group other than the choir and musicians of the Basilica support a papal Mass. On the other hand, artistic displays of visiting groups occur in the audiences, and sometimes outdoors after a Mass in the square. I would not be surprised if Polish music and dance occured in those extra-liturgical circumstances and that the Pope appreciated the music of his homeland. THAT would not create a dogmatic fact or liturgical norm (its not even IN the liturgy at that point) that overturns the complete imappropriateness of non-sacred music (polka, jazz, rock, blues etc.) in the Mass.