C
Carmelite1983
Guest
Jesus won’t cause harm,
But the germs on the tongue of the person in line infront of me? I’d say so!
But the germs on the tongue of the person in line infront of me? I’d say so!
I remember (name removed by moderator) once making a post about some of that stuff and how in the US at least there has been found to be no detectable correlation between receiving from the chalice and increased risk of sickness. Not sure where to find it though.He has moved on since then but sometimes I still feel his presence. He also explained that the metal used killed germs,
No, it certainly wasn’t. The events prior to the indult may have been unlawful, but an indult by definition is lawful and makes something so - it can’t be obtained unlawfully. At any rate, it is now acceptable per Holy Mother Church to receive in the hand, so your comments are neither helpful nor productive. It would be best if you refrained from such in the future.In addition to what this priest has said, the communion-in-the-hand indult was obtained unlawfully.
Except the Pope doesn’t say that.Here’s why Communion on the tongue is, all things being equal, the most suitable manner of reception.
Udienza Generale del 21 marzo 2018: La Santa Messa - 14. Liturgia eucaristica. IV. La Comunione | Francesco
According to ecclesial practice, the faithful usually approaches the Eucharist in a processional form, as we have said, and communicates himself standing with devotion or kneeling, as established by the Episcopal Conference, receiving the sacrament in the mouth or, where it is permitted, on the hand, as he prefers (see OGMR , 160-161).
My theory is that it has to do with the practices of the priest and the layout of the church.I don’t think I’ve ever seen it 50/50. I wonder what are the factors that drive the difference.