D
dochawk
Guest
No doubt you will be flagged for such . . .I was told to receive the Body with my hands in preparation for my First Communion, but I like to receive on the tongue nowadays. See? We can be civil here on CAF![]()
No doubt you will be flagged for such . . .I was told to receive the Body with my hands in preparation for my First Communion, but I like to receive on the tongue nowadays. See? We can be civil here on CAF![]()
Perhaps you should read my post which was not in any way a personal attack on the 15 day long member. I was contributing in the same fashion with facts and observations. The fact that the member went postal on me with complete distortions is the members issue. I’ve got no intention of engaging that sort of behaviour.Methinks the emerald lady doth protest too much
Interesting I ran across This article which suggest that the Apostles might have received on their tongues.I feel like if it werent reverent, Jesus would have had the apostles put out their tongues at the last supper.
Really? That’s interesting. I’ve never seen reception from the chalice like that before. Did the priest/EM tip the chalice to the communicant’s lips while they received? Seems kinda dangerous. I see a big hazard of spilling the Precious Blood that way.Out of interest foes anyone receive the blood if Christ without touching the chalice? I remember some old people when I was younger that did.
Do you also have a problem drinking the Precious Blood from the Chalice after the entire congregation before you has already done so? If you do not, then I have to ask if you have ever seen a presentation on what actually happens to the liquid inside of a vessel whenever someone drinks from any kind of cup, glass or chalice? You might want to look it up, if you have a strong stomach.I hope we don’t go back to receiving on the tongue in my lifetime because we are so aware of how transfer of saliva communicates germs and disease. When only a few people choose to do it, it seems benign but I would struggle knowing that I’m receiving the transfer of the whole congregations saliva.
Oh it isn’t my argument against Communion on the tongue. It’s my personal reasoning for preferring in the hand. If the Church were to mandate on the tongue I would obediently accept a return to the practice.Emeraldlady:![]()
Do you also have a problem drinking the Precious Blood from the Chalice after the entire congregation before you has already done so? If you do not, then I have to ask if you have ever seen a presentation on what actually happens to the liquid inside of a vessel whenever someone drinks from any kind of cup, glass or chalice? You might want to look it up, if you have a strong stomach.I hope we don’t go back to receiving on the tongue in my lifetime because we are so aware of how transfer of saliva communicates germs and disease. When only a few people choose to do it, it seems benign but I would struggle knowing that I’m receiving the transfer of the whole congregations saliva.
When Communion is properly given on the tongue, the Priest is always very careful about how he does it. All he does is place the host on the tongue, without touching the tongue at all.
So, your argument against Communion on the tongue doesn’t really hold up, especially if you’re also inclined to receive under both species.