B
burnside
Guest
Sorry to harp on about this,but there are many attractive types i know are also the laziest.Governments pay lip service to the idea of equal opportunities for the disabled.Many disabled people can do a job better than what i call the “posers” who are not nearly as good-looking as they think they are.Why is there this reluctance to give a bit of leeway to the disabled when a bit of speed is required?Is it about jealousy that the disabled person might show some people up when accuracy is more important than speed?
There are some jobs which can make the dumbest blonde on the planet look good.The kind of work which requires quick fingers but no brain,which children could basically do but the volume
required is the problem.If Governments are as serious about
equal opportunities for the disabled as they seem to be about
women and other minorities,why do they not practise positive discrimination with regard to the disabled as they do with women and ethnic minorities?Either subsidize Companies in order that they can accept a lesser amount of work from the disabled or
give the disabled the option of working the necessary extra hours without overtime payments,in order that they can do the required volume of work.That option is not always available to them.
There are some jobs which can make the dumbest blonde on the planet look good.The kind of work which requires quick fingers but no brain,which children could basically do but the volume
required is the problem.If Governments are as serious about
equal opportunities for the disabled as they seem to be about
women and other minorities,why do they not practise positive discrimination with regard to the disabled as they do with women and ethnic minorities?Either subsidize Companies in order that they can accept a lesser amount of work from the disabled or
give the disabled the option of working the necessary extra hours without overtime payments,in order that they can do the required volume of work.That option is not always available to them.