Poorest Cities in U.S

  • Thread starter Thread starter JustaServant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JustaServant

Guest
I spotted this on a political forum.
I noticed no city in West Virginia is listed.
Of course, you’d be hard pressed to FIND a city in West Virginia.😃
  1. Detroit, 33.3% in poverty
  2. Cleveland, 30.5% in poverty
  3. Buffalo, 30.3% in poverty
  4. Newark, 26.1% in poverty
  5. Miami, 25.6% in poverty
  6. Fresno, 25.5% in poverty
  7. Cincinnati, 25.1% in poverty
  8. Toledo, 24.7% in poverty
  9. El Paso, 24.3% in poverty
  10. Philadelphia, 24.1% in poverty
  11. Milwaukee, 23.4% in poverty
  12. Memphis, 23.1% in poverty
  13. St. Louis, 22.9% in poverty
  14. Dallas, 22.6% in poverty
  15. New Orleans, 22.6% in poverty
  16. Atlanta, 22.4% in poverty
  17. Stockton, Calif., 21.6% in poverty
  18. Minneapolis, 21.3% in poverty
  19. Pittsburgh, 21.2% in poverty
  20. Tucson, 20.9% in poverty
Complete list:
buffalo.bizjournals.com/buffalo/stories/2009/09/28/daily18.html#
 
Our country has become way to reliant on the rich. Surveys like this typically lead to us giving more in welfare to the under productive in our society. I hope that they instead use this to justify higher education standards, more buy American policies, more incentives to keep production jobs in the states, more research into making it cheaper to live (lower priced cars, food, homes, etc.)
 
You can prove a lot of things with statistics. This ranking is based solely on adjusted gross income, as are many poverty studies. It also does not count the value of food stamps, housing assistance, education assistance, and free medical care.

Since Warren Buffet’s wealth declined by $10 billion last year, is he the poorest man in America?

People who live within their means and save part of their income every year can take a one time hit into this official poverty without becoming needy. Those who live irresponsibly on borrowed money can find themselves homeless even with incomes well above the official poverty level.

I cannot remember from one year to the next what my income was. It is something that only the IRS cares about. I measure a good or bad year by how much I have left and how much I gave away. That is a lot more meaningful to me than the number I report to IRS.
 
Very very informative! Good post.
Interesting observation from my wife. Many of these top cities are predomately Catholic. What that means I am not sure. Interesting question for speculation as to why.
Also, Trader is right in that there is much this list does not take into consideration. What constitutes poverty?
 
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but every city on that list has had Democrat mayors for at least the last 20 years.

Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.”
 
lets ask ourselves who defines this

if it is the city proper, than yes buffalo is screwedup

including the suburbs, im not buying that
 
Someone correct me if I’m wrong, but every city on that list has had Democrat mayors for at least the last 20 years.

Einstein once said, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.”
Uhhhh…well yes.😉 That did not go unnoticed on the conservative website that linked this page. 😃
 
Well, this makes perfect sense, since the vast majority of Americans live in metropolitan areas, and the poorest generally live inside the city propers. The US poverty rate overall is 13%, so it seems that the poor are in the cities at around twice the rate as outside the cities.
 
Our country has become way to reliant on the rich. Surveys like this typically lead to us giving more in welfare to the under productive in our society. I hope that they instead use this to justify higher education standards, more buy American policies, more incentives to keep production jobs in the states, more research into making it cheaper to live (lower priced cars, food, homes, etc.)
I want to hone in on cheaper cars briefly. Throw out airpolution control, throw out fuel injection and bring back the carburator, bring back rear wheel drive, and wala cheaper car, and not to mention a car the man of the house can repair. Bring down health care costs by having bigger cars that people walk away from the crash instead of getting hurt. Cars today are junk.
 
Worth reading.

taxfoundation.org/files/bp59.pdf

Which states are best for business and which tend to chase business away.

Here’s a summary:

taxfoundation.org/files/bp59_es.pdf

Super summary:

The ten best states in the Tax Foundation’s 2010
State Business Tax Climate Index are as follows:
  1. South Dakota
  2. Wyoming
  3. Alaska
  4. Nevada
  5. Florida
  6. Montana
  7. New Hampshire
  8. Delaware
  9. Washington
  10. Utah
The ten worst states are:
41. Vermont
42. Wisconsin
43. Minnesota
44. Rhode Island
45. Maryland
46. Iowa
47. Ohio
48. California
49. New York
50. New Jersey

The more riddled a tax system is with these politically motivated preferences the less likely it is that business decisions will be made in response to market forces. The SBTCI
rewards those states that apply these principles in five important areas of taxation:

individual income taxes,
major business taxes,
sales taxes,
unemployment insurance taxes, and
taxes on wealth or assets such as property.
 
I want to hone in on cheaper cars briefly. Throw out airpolution control, throw out fuel injection and bring back the carburator, bring back rear wheel drive, and wala cheaper car, and not to mention a car the man of the house can repair. Bring down health care costs by having bigger cars that people walk away from the crash instead of getting hurt. Cars today are junk.
This is off-topic, but I am still mad that teenage boys have nothing to do except play violent video games since they started making cars that no one can work on at home.
 
I want to hone in on cheaper cars briefly. Throw out airpolution control, throw out fuel injection and bring back the carburator, bring back rear wheel drive, and wala cheaper car, and not to mention a car the man of the house can repair. Bring down health care costs by having bigger cars that people walk away from the crash instead of getting hurt. Cars today are junk.
All of the things you want to throw out are the result of government. Extremely sophisticated pollution controls; not just a PCV valve. Engines that are sealed so that no body can work on them. Computer controls that are outrageously expensive and impossible to work on.

The worst government regulation is the CAFE standards. They are mandatory miles per gallon standards that are almost impossible to meet. And getting worse. So you get fuel injection (which improves mileage and reduces unburned fuel/ reduces pollution) but is extremely expensive. Anybody can fix or rebuild a careburetor.

The only reason we have so many SUV’s is that they are considered to be trucks and not cars. So they aren’t covered by the CAFE standards. But the liberals are working hard to control SUV’s. One of my friends is extremely angry about SUV’s but he drives one himself because he needs to be able to haul a lot of stuff for his business. People need larger vehicles to carry around their families and for errands; those oversized golf carts just don’t do the job. But liberals are anti family.

You see very few station wagons on the road nowadays. They are a family car. If you have a family, you need something like a station wagon or a van (which is a truck all tarted up to look nice). All those CAFE standards are basically anti-family.

When you add up all those government rules, each one contributes to making life more and more difficult for families. Mothers HAVE to work because the overall tax burden is so extremely high and all the rules makes it very difficult for moms to stay at home.

Getting back to the original post about the poorest cities. What kind of cars do inner city people drive? They drive old cars and clunkers and jalopies that they can get for very cheap. But under the new rules, those cars generate too much pollution and get poor mileage and under the cash-for-clunkers programs many of them were taken off the road and melted down.

So all those allegedly well-meaning safety rules, and pollution rules, and CAFE mileage rules and cash-for-clunkers rules only hurt the poorest of the poor.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top