H
Hidden_One
Guest
Agreed.
The thread is misleading and it needed to be addressed.This thread is starting to read like a Pharisaical argument rather than Christian apologetics.
I think Reformed Christians would agree with your understanding with the word “if”. There is no dispute in regards to a manifestation of changed life reflective of charity and love. I think 1 John also testifies to a change with chariity and love. I’m not sure if I follow why some Catholics think the word “if” changes what Pope Benedict taught. It is consistent with Reformed theology that those who have been justified will be transformed by the grace of God, increasing in charity and love.The Pope said Luther’s phrase was ture if… [his clarifications follow]
He did not say Luther’s interpretation of the phrase is true…
“St Paul speaks of faith that works through love (cf. Gal 5: 14).” says the Pope
If faith works thought love - faith is not alone - it has love
St Paul says if we have all faith but not love/charity we are nothing
He says love/charity is greater than faith hence St James says we are not justified by faith alone
“Paul knows that in the twofold love of God and neighbour the whole of the Law is present and carried out. Thus in communion with Christ, in a faith that creates charity, the entire Law is fulfilled.” says the Pope.
Paul makes distinctions between works of the old Law without grace and works of the new law under grace.
“And charity is the fulfilment of communion with Christ.” says the Pope
No charity (good works) and we do not fulfil communion with Christ.
"Thus, at the end of this Gospel we can almost say: love alone, charity alone." says the Pope
Ti 3:8 It is a faithful saying. And these things I will have thee affirm constantly, that **they who believe in God **may be careful to excel in good works. These things are good and profitable unto men.
Ti 3:14 And let our men also learn to excel in good works for necessary uses: that they be not unfruitful.
And if we don’t excel in good works and become an unfruitufl tree?
Paul, James and Benedict teach the same thing.
Putting my two cents in, we are saved by faith alone…in Jesus Christ…summed in the Nicene Creed, …And Jesus said we will be judged by the little things…how did we serve Him in the poor, imprisoned, sick…"
I took a course on Ecumenism with a bishop who was on that council at Vatican II. Corruption and scruples, and people no longer wanting to follow an authority higher than themselves or their own way of looking at things…
The saints always spoke it is Jesus alone Who saves…but likewise, we must be willing to die to ourselves and let the new life of Christ seed in our souls.
Put these two together and I think one has the understanding of the JDDJ, and frankly, the Pope’s comment. We are indeed justified by grace alone through faith in Christ alone. But faith cannot ever be alone, as a true, living, active faith must also have and show love for our fellow man. If Christ prepares us for good works and we choose not to respond, can we really say our faith is a living, and not a dead faith?EphelDuath:
It is not faith that saves. It is the grace of God through the death and resurrection of Christ
I agree with your two cents.Putting my two cents in, we are saved by faith alone…in Jesus Christ…summed in the Nicene Creed, …And Jesus said we will be judged by the little things…how did we serve Him in the poor, imprisoned, sick…"
I took a course on Ecumenism with a bishop who was on that council at Vatican II. Corruption and scruples, and people no longer wanting to follow an authority higher than themselves or their own way of looking at things…
The saints always spoke it is Jesus alone Who saves…but likewise, we must be willing to die to ourselves and let the new life of Christ seed in our souls.
Agreed, faith is the instrument that we receive the grace of God merited by Jesus Christ through His perfect life, sacrifical death, and the ressurecton… proving that God was satisfied with the perfect work of Christ on behalf of sinners who believe (faith). We are saved by grace alone through the instrument of faith, or possibly through the instrument of faith alone. The kind of faith that saves is never alone, because saving faith changes us to the image of His Son (progressively over a lifetime through the Spirit).It is not faith that saves. It is the grace of God through the death and resurrection of Christ.
You see, Protestants and Catholics are more like minded in unity than many of us think.Put these two together and I think one has the understanding of the JDDJ, and frankly, the Pope’s comment. We are indeed justified by grace alone through faith in Christ alone. But faith cannot ever be alone, as a true, living, active faith must also have and show love for our fellow man. If Christ prepares us for good works and we choose not to respond, can we really say our faith is a living, and not a dead faith?
Jon
You are spot on here. Without Grace faith could not be possible. And without faith working together with the Grace of God good works could not be possible.It is not faith that saves. It is the grace of God through the death and resurrection of Christ.
If we all keep in mind that properly understood, Luther’s “Faith Alone” never discounts the importance of good works, and that properly understood, Catholic “Faith and Works” is not semi-pelagianism, or a belief that one can work his way to heaven, then ISTM we have a solid common ground from which to discuss.You see, Protestants and Catholics are more like minded in unity than many of us think.
Hi Jon:wave: I think that its the word ALONE that gets everyone fighting. If Luther would have just said faith without alone it would have been fine. But its the faith alone that causes everyone to go Crazy!If we all keep in mind that properly understood, Luther’s “Faith Alone” never discounts the importance of good works, and that properly understood, Catholic “Faith and Works” is not semi-pelagianism, or a belief that one can work his way to heaven, then ISTM we have a solid common ground from which to discuss.
Jon
How do you reconcile your post with the Council of Trent, writings of Pope Leo in regards to Martin Luther and the teaching of justification and agreement with Luther by Pope Benedict? It would be academically dishonest if you think there is no change in regards to faith alone and Martin Luther from the 16th century to the 21st century. Heck, I just read the Joint Declaration between some Lutheran Churches and the Catholic Church. The Joint Declaration said the anathemas (condemnation) of the Council of Trent no longer applies to those Lutheran Churches who are part of that Joint Declaration. That is a very significant change.The faith of the Catholic Church established by the Lord Christ does not change. It teaches the same dogma that was taught in the first century. Your interpretation of the facts is incorrect.
Hi rinnie. How are you?Hi Jon:wave: I think that its the word ALONE that gets everyone fighting. If Luther would have just said faith without alone it would have been fine. But its the faith alone that causes everyone to go Crazy!![]()
The word alone was needed and the esential component of the Protestant Reformation.Hi Jon:wave: I think that its the word ALONE that gets everyone fighting. If Luther would have just said faith without alone it would have been fine. But its the faith alone that causes everyone to go Crazy!![]()
Not to me, The word alone should have never been added and the Protestant Reformation should have never came about and we should all be ONE Faith, ONE CHurch the Way Jesus wanted it.The word alone was needed and the esential component of the Protestant Reformation.
It was then, as some were practicing, probably outside of Catholic teaching, a form of semi-pelagianism. Now, I don’t mind saying Grace Alone through faith in Christ aloneThe word alone was needed and the esential component of the Protestant Reformation.
Hence why Lutheranism is incompatible with the doctrines of the Catholic Church.The word alone was needed and the esential component of the Protestant Reformation.