W
weirdcatholic
Guest
As far as I know…no. But who knows. Maybe some digging at vatican.va would show otherwise. Pope Francis has gotten more press than some popes I feel:shrug:
I don’t know why you get that feeling.Why do I get the feeling that if the same thing happened under +Benedict, the headlines would have read
MSNBC “Pope views women as breeding milk cows”
CNN “Pope wants topless women at Mass”
I think you’re wrong on this. The press just didn’t want to hear what he had to say.Pope Benedict, for all of his strengths, was not near as accessible.
Exactly.I think you’re wrong on this. The press just didn’t want to hear what he had to say.
They just have different ways of presenting themselves in public. John Paul II was seen very much like Pope Francis, but Benedict just can across, at least, on TV as a little more serious, pious, spiritual, or whatever word you want to use.Exactly.
It’s amazing how much even devout Catholics can be confused by the press. They are making Francis look like a much more active, interesting pope than Benedict simply by PAYING ATTENTION to what he has to say!
Benedict was active too, but I can’t say that I ever noticed the press gushing over him.
I agree. Absolutely.They just have different ways of presenting themselves in public. John Paul II was seen very much like Pope Francis, but Benedict just can across, at least, on TV as a little more serious, pious, spiritual, or whatever word you want to use.
I think the fact that Pope Francis is living in the guest quarters, and has changed a few of the norms the Popes have done in the past has people wondering what he will do next, so yes they are paying more attention to him. Some people took to Benedict, some did not. We all have our preferences. All that matters is that they preach the teachings of the Catholic Church.
A mother should not have to change her very nature behavior because someone struggles with lust.Can public breastfeeding be a distraction and stumbling block? Especially for those who struggle with lust?
Im not sure Im saying they shouldn’t, I was asking if that would be an obstacle for some, if not most, people.@thorns & shelby: I’m with shelby on this one. thorns, is your mental image of breastfeeding that the mom completely disrobes and sits basically shirtless to nurse? If so, I think that is probably inaccurate. I suspect that any mom who is breastfeeding at the Sistine Chapel will do so discreetly, with a shawl, etc.; most of the time it would probably be hard to even tell what was going on.
that being said, even if it was a little more obvious, it seems to me that shelby’s point still holds. That is, it is up to the onlooker to control his reaction in that instance.
Such an understanding and merciful tone in this post, thanks.There’s a Madonna Lactans icon in our church.
Good on Pope Frances. People who find breastfeeding disturbing need to get over themselves.
On his part, but I would feel comfortable with myself and what I was doing. Most women breastfeed with a blanket covering their baby, and I would assume they would be doing that while in church.Such an understanding and merciful tone in this post, thanks.
If you breastfed in public and a man was oogling you with perverse eyes, wouldn’t you find THAT disturbing?
D’ya know…there are covers for breastfeeding…if you are in a circumstance where you want to feed your kid without revealing yourself…like in a church. Those do exist…Such an understanding and merciful tone in this post, thanks.
If you breastfed in public and a man was oogling you with perverse eyes, wouldn’t you find THAT disturbing?