Pope Francis & Liturgical Dance

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikeledes
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hello. Officially, liturgical dance is not allowed in the Mass. Somehow I suspect that these recent words from Pope Francis will be misconstrued to support it:

"I wonder sometimes how many times we despise good people in our hearts, good people who praise the Lord as it comes to them, so spontaneously, because they are not cultured, because they do not follow the formalities? * despise [them]? The Bible says that, because of this, Michal remained sterile for the rest of her life. What does the Word of God mean, here? [It means] that joy, that the prayer of praise makes us fruitful! Sarah danced in the great moment of her fecundity – at the age of ninety! The fruitfulness that praise of the Lord gives us, the gratuity of praising the Lord: that man or that woman who praises the Lord, who prays praising the Lord, who, when praying the Gloria is filled with joy at doing so, and who, when singing the Sanctus in the Mass rejoices in singing it, is a fruitful person.”

Text from page en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/01/28/pope_francis_at_daily_mass:the_fruitfulness_of_praise/en1-768047*
of the Vatican Radio website

How do we respond to this? Thank you.

As a general rule, I would say that we ought to have learned with Pope Benedict and surely ought to know with Pope Francis that he presumes that his listeners are trying to understand the total context of his preaching, rather than cherry-picking sound bites to suit them.

He was commenting on praising God with a spontaneous and heartfelt show of emotion–do we praise God in a heartfelt way? He was not referring to choreographies! He specifically referred to those who would object: But, Father! This is for the Renewal in the Spirit folks, not for all Christians!’ He was not referring to people who change the formalities, but people who pray beyond formality, who pray with spontaneous expressions of joy. He was asking “if you see someone who praises in a spontaneous way, why would that upset you? If you don’t praise God with heartfelt joy yourself, why not?” IOW, his comment has nothing to do with ignoring the rubrics that govern formal expressions such as choreographed dances. It had to do with letting our prayer penetrate us so that it will include and express and even develop our emotional connection with God. We should not reject spontaneous emotion in prayer, either in ourselves or in others, because that can make our prayer barren.
janeway529;11664918:
The U.S. is unique in that it’s the only nation where almost exclusively its population is made up of immigrants who have brought their cultural traditions and customs with them to their new country, becoming a kind of “cultural missionary.” Due to the desegregation and integration of parishes from their once “national/ethnic parish” roots, we’ve begun to see a sort of “organic adoption” of “liturgical dance” unknown anywhere else in the world. Especially in large dioceses, like my own, you may see a “Celebration of Cultures Mass” like this one we have every year: youtube.com/watch?v=H5O9uVG-RWM
Actually, Canada, Australia, and Argentina are also “melting pots” with many ethnic groups well-represented among the citizenry. He probably has a great deal of experience with this broad set of issues among the faithful.
 
Barry,
I keep saying that you have to be familiar with the rubrics. You don’t seem to have figured out what I’m saying here. You have misconstrued my statement.

Reb Levi
 
Hello. Officially, liturgical dance is not allowed in the Mass. Somehow I suspect that these recent words from Pope Francis will be misconstrued to support it:

"I wonder sometimes how many times we despise good people in our hearts, good people who praise the Lord as it comes to them, so spontaneously, because they are not cultured, because they do not follow the formalities? * despise [them]? The Bible says that, because of this, Michal remained sterile for the rest of her life. What does the Word of God mean, here? [It means] that joy, that the prayer of praise makes us fruitful! Sarah danced in the great moment of her fecundity – at the age of ninety! The fruitfulness that praise of the Lord gives us, the gratuity of praising the Lord: that man or that woman who praises the Lord, who prays praising the Lord, who, when praying the Gloria is filled with joy at doing so, and who, when singing the Sanctus in the Mass rejoices in singing it, is a fruitful person.”

Text from page en.radiovaticana.va/news/2014/01/28/pope_francis_at_daily_mass:the_fruitfulness_of_praise/en1-768047*
of the Vatican Radio website

How do we respond to this? Thank you.

I actually read it a bit differently, and not just referring to dance. Also, this is a translation from his original language, correct? If he said it in English, then the same ‘translation’ issues would apply as well. Not every word translates perfectly into another language. (For instance, some of the words I’ve had for the cold weather wouldn’t make sense in another language. 🙂 But thank you Lord for the moisture!!)

First, I read it as ‘differently/other cultured’ than much of the Western developed world, where such acts are not commonplace in our daily lives, let alone during Mass. We don’t generally express ourselves and our happiness through dance.

I also read it as: when someone does praise the Lord, do not judge. When someone lifts their hand, or face in praise of the Lord, do not judge. We shouldn’t do these things to disrupt Mass, or bring attention to ourselves. But I feel it many times during Mass. I do ‘temper’ it, and know the Lord doesn’t want me to disrupt or draw attention away.

Do not temper someone else’s joy in the Lord. Just because it is expressed differently than how you express it doesn’t make it wrong. I don’t know how people can not sing, not rejoice, not dance in their hearts…I don’t always have that joy, honestly, but I’m so glad when I do.

Personally, I’m more dismayed by the disrespect shown by others who talk with their neighbor throughout Mass, than I am by someone raising her hands, or dancing along to the Gloria in her spot in the pew.

Amen.
 
The last 2 Psalms tell us to dance in praise of the Lord. There is a world of difference between praising God with spontaneous dancing — one’s whole being is put into the praise — and Western social dancing. Liturgical dancing can also be very prayerful, in a different way, and is and has been used only during the entrance and exit processions. It would, of course, be totally out of place for the dancers to dance during the more important parts of the Mass.
One thing to keep in mind was that David, the traditional author of the Psalms, did his dancing praise OUTSIDE of the liturgy. It was only while the ark was processing from the house of Obed to Jerusalem. Once the ark was placed in the tent, there were offering and breaking of bread, but no dancing. That occasion was solemn

So, by David’s own example, it would be hard to read the Psalms as supporting dance within the context of the liturgy.
 
Pope John Paul II used African and Latin American drummers and AFRICAN DANCERS at his Papal Masses, presumably only for the entrance and exit processions. .
And even then, the Africans ‘dance’ simply as a traditional way of keeping time.

Here is an example I took in my last trip to Tanzania. The choir is leading the procession into Church.

sdrv.ms/1fzLLYB

There are similar movements when people go up during Offertory ( no baskets, people go up and put their monetary offerings into a box, or hand the produce or livestock to an altar boy).

You will see that it bears little resemblance to what passes for ‘liturgical’ dance in the West. If it was just people shuffling their feet in time with the music, or swaying their arms back and forth, there would be no objection.

But cartwheels down the aisle by ladies in leotards is another matter…and the Africans would not even consider such as being appropriate for the liturgy.
 
My parish in the Midwest has been doing liturgical dance for over 10 years now and we have never been told not to do it by the Bishop who is aware that we do it. That’s what attracted me to join this parish and leave my former parish. The music is also from the African American “Lead Me Guide Me” Catholic hymnal which is absolutely fabulous. Has a distinct gospel sound and feel. Just my experience.
 
My parish in the Midwest has been doing liturgical dance for over 10 years now and we have never been told not to do it by the Bishop who is aware that we do it. That’s what attracted me to join this parish and leave my former parish. The music is also from the African American “Lead Me Guide Me” Catholic hymnal which is absolutely fabulous. Has a distinct gospel sound and feel. Just my experience.
Go to post #5 and review the interview with Cardinal Arinze, at the time, he was head of the Congregation for Divine Worship, the agency in the Vatican that has authority over liturgical practices.
 
I can see how swaying, waving, even clapping to the beat, can be part of worship. But dance? I just can’t see it. It’s more like a sport. It can be fun to do and watch, but it doesn’t, in any way, help me connect to God. Maybe it’s possible but not in any culture I’m aware of.
 
Go to post #5 and review the interview with Cardinal Arinze, at the time, he was head of the Congregation for Divine Worship, the agency in the Vatican that has authority over liturgical practices.
The key here is the fact that there is no major church document addressing this issue. Cardinal Arinze says so in the video. He then relates his opinion on the matter. The parish in the Midwest I belong to that uses liturgical dance, is largely an African American parish. They certainly have had a unique experience in America and much of the dance is cultural. It’s a beautiful mass. There is a parish in Chicago (St. Sabina) I believe that’s the name of it, they by the way have a great priest who does much work in the trenches for social justice, I’ve heard they have a beautiful mass with liturgical dancing.
 
There is a parish in Chicago (St. Sabina) I believe that’s the name of it, they by the way have a great priest who does much work in the trenches for social justice, I’ve heard they have a beautiful mass with liturgical dancing.
Maybe they should have concession stands too. Hot dogs and beer. And a laser light show.

Look, if you want to do these things outside of Mass in the parish hall, more power to you. How can I help? But Mass has a purpose and it isn’t to entertain. Have lively music and fiery homilies but I can’t see how people running around with ribbons adds anything of value to the Mass.
 
Maybe they should have concession stands too. Hot dogs and beer. And a laser light show.

Look, if you want to do these things outside of Mass in the parish hall, more power to you. How can I help? But Mass has a purpose and it isn’t to entertain. Have lively music and fiery homilies but I can’t see how people running around with ribbons adds anything of value to the Mass.
Wow. That wasn’t necessary. Just because different cultures don’t have the same cultural expressions in Mass as YOU do, doesn’t make them wrong. If the Vatican had a problem with it, these would NOT be allowed.

Believe me, no one desires reverence at Mass more than I do (see my recent posts on it); however, different cultures express it differently. I don’t sing at Mass to entertain; I don’t feel the wiggle in my waggle during the songs just because they sound good. I don’t feel the joy of the Spirit in my heart and soul for any other reason than to honor, praise, worship God. In general, most of the western world does it very similarly; not 100%, and that doesn’t make it wrong. It would be wrong for me to dance in the aisle in my own Roman Catholic parish. It doesn’t mean it would be out of place in the one he is talking about. I don’t believe it’s there to entertain. It’s expressing worship and praise and joy.

If you had seen the African priests visiting our parishes that I have, you might see it differently. Even if you hadn’t, I hope that you would have openness in your heart to those different than you.

God bless and keep you,
 
Yup! Here are some examples of liturgical dance during the liturgy:


  1. *]World Youth Day in Sydney where you have native peoples dancing while processing the Book of the Gospels to the deacon. youtube.com/watch?v=YMgUaeejl2Q
    *]Christmas Mass in Congo - youtube.com/watch?v=PxxTG9Wo2-Y
    *]Transitional Diaconate Ordination in Kenya (Those deacons can dance!) - youtube.com/watch?v=bw49asb0QyA

  1. True that. It’s cultural. However it shouldn’t be allowed in the United States unless it’s cultural. Also, to me liturgical dancing that i’ve seen through youtube that i’ve seen in the US seems to be like some weirdo new age ritual or something like that. Honestly what’s so bad about just celebrating a nice normal mass that’s reverent and beautiful, is it that hard.
 
ccmcmg, I don’t think we’re talking about the same thing. I’m familiar with St. Sabina and they put on shows during Mass. If you were so filled with the Holy Spirit that you started jumping up and down waving your hands, that would be more appropriate than the shows they put on. They serve no other purpose other than entertainment. You can see for yourself: youtube.com/watch?v=ce-zDNE8zZM
 
Right. But for the US, there would be very little room for liturgical dance unless you had a congregation made up exclusively of refugees from the Congo. . .

The average U.S. parish has no members who come from a culture of non-Western dance. And the average ‘rendition’ of ‘liturgical dance’ from the 1970s on which were inflicted upon this type of parish used a kind of ‘interpretive dance’ that was strictly Western, a sort of pseudo-‘Grecian’ step-step-turn-raise the urn on high-waft to the side, swing and lower–step-step, put the urn down, raise arms, allow your diaphanous garments to flutter; leap like a gazelle onto the stage, oops, I mean, around the altar --raise arms to hold hands with ‘presider’, hold, hold, drop, and ‘waft’ back three paces to wait for the next dance moment. . .
I love it! I can almost see it. To describe it is to deride it. Well done! Best to leave this embarrassment back in the sixties.
 
Wow. That wasn’t necessary. Just because different cultures don’t have the same cultural expressions in Mass as YOU do, doesn’t make them wrong. If the Vatican had a problem with it, these would NOT be allowed.,
The problem with that statement is that there is NO culture on Earth that has a history of liturgical dance at Mass.

The Latinos certainly do not, they have gone for centuries without dancing at Mass.

The closest one, as Cardinal Arinze pointed out, and I provided a video for, is African, where there is a rhythmic shuffling of feet to keep time with the music.
 
True that. It’s cultural. However it shouldn’t be allowed in the United States unless it’s cultural. Also, to me liturgical dancing that i’ve seen through youtube that i’ve seen in the US seems to be like some weirdo new age ritual or something like that. Honestly what’s so bad about just celebrating a nice normal mass that’s reverent and beautiful, is it that hard.
I think the main thing at issue with regard to the United States is: 1) Do cultural liturgical practices immigrate along with their peoples? 2) With integrated parishes that celebrate with certain liturgical practices (i.e. Liturgical “Dance”)*, can members, not of the same ethnic origin, participate in the same form of bodily expression (i.e. Liturgical “Dance”)?

It’s really unity in universality (diversity) rather than unity in uniformity. As Pope Francis has already said, "The Church is Catholic because it is the ‘House of Harmony,’ where unity and diversity know how to join together to be a richness. Let us think of the image of a symphony, which means agreement, harmony, different instruments playing together, each retaining its unmistakable timbre, and their characteristic sounds agree on something in common. Then there is the guide, the conductor, and in the performance everyone plays together in harmony, but the timbre of each instrument is not erased, and the peculiarity of each is used to its best advantage! It’s a beautiful image that tells us that the Church is like a great orchestra in which there is variety. We are not all the same, and we should not all be the same! We are all diverse, different. Everybody has their own qualities, and that’s the beauty of the Church: Everyone brings their own qualities, which are from God, in order to enrich others. Uniformity kills life. The life of the Church is varied, and when we want to make everyone uniform, we kill the gifts of the Holy Spirit."
youtube.com/watch?v=txlhEegKvco
  • = I put Dance in quotation marks because not everyone’s understanding of the term Dance is the same. For some, any form of bodily movement is considered “dance.” For this reason, some parishes have gone out of their way to re-term it “Ministry of Movement.”
 
The problem with that statement is that there is NO culture on Earth that has a history of liturgical dance at Mass.

The Latinos certainly do not, they have gone for centuries without dancing at Mass.

The closest one, as Cardinal Arinze pointed out, and I provided a video for, is African, where there is a rhythmic shuffling of feet to keep time with the music.
I’ll leave this link here.
The History of Dance in the Church refinedundignified.com/the-history-of-dance-in-the-church.html
 
I’ll leave this link here.
The History of Dance in the Church refinedundignified.com/the-history-of-dance-in-the-church.html
I’ll pour through that 80 page paper later, but just off the top of my head, a link to a PAPER (and anybody can write papers) by a group that was formed 10 years ago with the stated mission to ‘bring people to the gospel through dance’ kind of brings the phrase ‘special pleading’ to my mind. Still, I’ll check it out later.
 
I’ll pour through that 80 page paper later, but just off the top of my head, a link to a PAPER (and anybody can write papers) by a group that was formed 10 years ago with the stated mission to ‘bring people to the gospel through dance’ kind of brings the phrase ‘special pleading’ to my mind. Still, I’ll check it out later.
I did review it,

It has a number of historical errors, such as Constantine granting religious freedom and making it the State religion. It did neither. Religious freedom had already been granted to the Christians, what the Edict of Milan did was to state that property that had been confiscated by the State from Christians was to be returned.

It did confirm that the Catholic Church did not permit dance in the liturgy, and the only modern references are to the Great Awakening, which was a series of Protestant evangelical movements. That, of course, would have no relationship to the conduct of a Catholic liturgy, and offered no evidence that it did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top