G
Godisgreat23
Guest
This is really great I for one believe that catholic church needs to go back to its roots and make changes to those which were present during the times of Pope Pius X.
He didn’t leave them in poverty. He did not make them princesses (of the Vatican court or whatever other lands the Church owned at the time), but they did have dinner with him regularly and were not left out in the cold.I don’t see much merit in allowing his sisters to remain in poverty.
True. But St. Pius X is perhaps the best known Pope who has become, among many, the personification of Tradition and strict adherence to doctrine. Also, you’ll see many traditionalists on-line using Pope Francis’ humble style as fodder for a belief that he is somehow a “modernist” or otherwise heterodox, when, in fact, St. Pius X’s humble style - especially in 1903 monarchial, imperial Europe - was just as much a departure from Papal practices at the time as Pope Francis’ humble style is today.I have been researching other popes…specifically other “religious” popes and I am finding there were a number of popes that reformed the Church in various ways as well as focusing more on the poor, etc. One such other Pope was Pius V (a Dominican), so I’m not so sure you can take just one other Pope (Pius X) and compare him to Pope Francis.
Ah, fair enough. That makes sense for sure.True. But St. Pius X is perhaps the best known Pope who has become, among many, the personification of Tradition and strict adherence to doctrine. Also, you’ll see many traditionalists on-line using Pope Francis’ humble style as fodder for a belief that he is somehow a “modernist” or otherwise heterodox, when, in fact, St. Pius X’s humble style - especially in 1903 monarchial, imperial Europe - was just as much a departure from Papal practices at the time as Pope Francis’ humble style is today.
In other words, the example of St. Pius X is ideal proof that a Pope can be closer to “the people” and cut back on ceremony, while remaining faithful to Tradition and doctrine.