Yes, I’m excited by this too. Pray for unity.Pope Francis has declared that priests of the Society of St. Pius X, founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, will validly and licitly absolve sins during the upcoming Jubilee Year of Mercy, …
More…

The Society of St. Pius X is an order of priests who only celebrate the pre-Vatican II Mass ( called the ‘Tridentine Mass’)Forgive my lack of knowledge, but what does the Pope mean by “priests of the Society of St. Pius X” ? I don’t think, as a newcomer, that I actually understand what any of this means. Could someone kindly explain? Thanks!
Indeed. Certainly consistent with his plea for more confessions, among other things.Well done, Holy Father!
Apparently so.Doesn’t this give them a de facto legitimate ministry?
As I understand it, all faculties of hearing confessions originate with the Vatican.If they do, won’t that be a thumping of their nose in the face of the local bishops?
I don’t know if they will “accept” it. My guess would be that they will be grateful for the gesture because it helps us all agree that they have faculties to forgive sin at least temporarily. I suppose they will maintain that they already had faculties and continue to have them, even though the pope seems to suggest that their faculties will expire at the end of the Jubilee. I pray that some more permanent, agreeable solution can be worked out before then.But doesn’t this really pose a problem for the sspx? They have claimed all along that they have faculties to hear confessions (and marriages, too). If they accept this limited faculty, it implies that they haven’t had proper authority all along.
That’s what I guess they would do, but who knows, the Holy Spirit may move in their hearts during this time to restore full communion with the Holy Father.What happens when the jubilee year is over and their faculties expire? Will they still hear confessions? If they do, won’t that be a thumping of their nose in the face of the local bishops?
That’s how it seems to me. They did not have a legitimate ministry under BXVI; they do now because Pope Francis has given it to them using his apostolic authority. And I think we should praise God for it and pray for permanent, full unity.Also, Pope Benedict has said that the sspx do not have a legitimate ministry in the Church. Doesn’t this give them a de facto legitimate ministry?
Unless a more permanent solution is found, I think they will go back to not having faculties, and those priests of the SSPX who continue to hear confessions will be doing so invalidly. But any priest who hears confessions without faculties will probably go on claiming he has faculties for the same reasons they currently use, though I don’t know what those reasons are. (It probably has something to do with having validly ordained bishops as part of the SSPX.)And again, what happens at the end of the year when this de facto ministry is no more?
There really is no ‘acceptance’ here. The SSPX priests will continue doing what they are doing, but now their Absolutions will be licit and validIf they accept this limited faculty, it implies that they haven’t had proper authority all along.
de facto and de jure. By definition it is legitimate, as it conforms to the legio (law) of the Church, under Papal authorityDoesn’t this give them a de facto legitimate ministry?
That is not true. A priest must have faculties, and those faculties are often limited.Very confusing…I read the Pope will allow more priests to forgive people who had abortions during the “jubilee of mercy”. I thought any priest could always give absolution for any sin, if the person is sorry!![]()
A lot can happen within a year, and it could be enough time for a paradigm or status quo to have been set. But I could be wrong. Take advantage when you can is all I can say.Unless a more permanent solution is found, I think they will go back to not having faculties, and those priests of the SSPX who continue to hear confessions will be doing so invalidly. But any priest who hears confessions without faculties will probably go on claiming he has faculties for the same reasons they currently use, though I don’t know what those reasons are. (It probably has something to do with having validly ordained bishops as part of the SSPX.)
The SSPX hear Confessions as it is (which they regard as valid, even though canonically they don’t have faculties to do so) will most likely not make a big fuss (publicly) about this, but will see this as a positive step towards full recognition within the Church. The SSPX will carry on hearing Confessions, but now, at least during the Jubilee Year both the SSPX and the Vatican will be in agreement that their Confessions are valid.But doesn’t this really pose a problem for the sspx? They have claimed all along that they have faculties to hear confessions (and marriages, too). If they accept this limited faculty, it implies that they haven’t had proper authority all along. What happens when the jubilee year is over and their faculties expire? Will they still hear confessions? If they do, won’t that be a thumping of their nose in the face of the local bishops?
I’m not sure that supplied (emergency) jurisdiction originates with the Vatican. It might. The SSPX believe that they have supplied jurisdiction, not ordinary jurisdiction.As I understand it, all faculties of hearing confessions originate with the Vatican.