Pope Francis Wants Action on Climate Change, a Life Issue

[kinja]

Nice try, but you do realize scientists don’t accept your points, tho they do sound good enough to deceive others.

The only ones deceiving other are ones who pretend that there are not many scientists you do not agree that human beings are contributing significantly to climate change. There is a lot of disagreement on this issue between scientists. Even if Climategate did not happen many scientists would still be skeptical since there is just not enough evidence to support it. Sorry.

 

[upant]

Even if man made climate change didn’t exist, what is so wrong about conserving resources and developing alternative fuels?

nothing but that isn’t the goal of the elite. the goal is globalism. this is why we will build new coal plants thru 2030 when we supposedly passed the no go zone for co2 in 2000.

why not put green energy in these developing countries if it is so wonderful and clean? why coal?

 

[upant]

I think the Bible does say or imply that end of the world will come about because of our sinfulness, so that sort of fits. Maybe this is the way it will end…or some other way ???

so co2 is the antichrist that the bible speaks of.

i thought he was to be an actual leader bringing world peace for a time?

 

[BadLt]

We have devout Catholics saying “sin” is causing climate change or just don’t believe in the scientists claims yet these same Catholics are the first ones in line getting their flu shots which were developed by scientists. No problem believing in that blood pressure and cancer medication they so eagerly ingest every day. But Evolution and Climate Change… we don’t believe that.

 

[Mark121359]

what utter nonsense, how can any believer in Jesus believe this stuff. will God let man destroy this world before Jesus returns? is the bible false? does it not say Jesus will return. does returning to an uninhabited planet count? does it not say evil will exist until He returns; this obviously means people will be here.

And to think that that quote; “if we continue on this path, it won’t be possible anymore to have human life on this planet.” is coming from the mouth of a member of the Catholic hierarchy…incredible!

 

[Ridgerunner]

H2O is a GHG, the most prevalent one, however, it is a FEEDBACK due to the increased warming due to the FORCING GHGs, such as CO2 and methane (CH4). It is a feedback because H2O molecules have a residence in the atmosphere of only a few days in general, while CO2 can be up there for 100s, even 1000s of years. A portion can be up there for up to 100,000 years. This is why experts in GHGs say CO2 is the more serious one, even though CH4 molecules are some 25 times more potent than CO2, bec CH4 only has a residence of about 10 years, until is degrades into CO2 etc.

RE H2O being a feedback (and not a forcing), if you think about it, warmer air holds more water vapor…which is why we are getting more and more serious deluges, killing 1000s of people (as in Asia these past few weeks), and more precip during hurricanes and blizzards.

Except, of course, that atmospheric H2O is not increasing. In the last few years it has, in fact, been in a mild decreasing trend.

Trends in Atmospheric Water Vapour

The basis of IPCC predictions is that any moderate warming caused by increased CO2 levels is enhanced by more evaporation from the oceans. Water vapour is itself a strong greenhouse gas and this in…

clivebest.com