R
robwar
Guest
all of this is totally falseThere’s a feature film that was made about that story that is very, very gripping and beautifully done.
As the story goes, she was to have reigned for 25 months, from 855 to 858, between the pontificates of Leo IV (847–855) and Benedict III (855–858).
She is mentioned in several writings, including that of 13th Century Dominican friar, bishop, and “chronicler” Martin of Opava, in his “Chronicon Pontificum et Imperatorum”.
The Encyclopedia Brittannica says the existence of Pope Joan was considered “fact” by attendants at The Council of Constance in 1415.
britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/304201/Pope-Joan#ref178500
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia:
*
In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries this popess was already counted as an historical personage, whose existence no one doubted. She had her place among the carved busts which stood in Siena Cathedral. Under Clement VIII, and at his request, she was transformed into Pope Zacharias. The heretic Hus, in the defense of his false doctrine before the Council of Constance, referred to the popess, and no one offered to question the fact of her existence. She is not found in the “Liber Pontificalis” nor among the papal portraits in St. Paul’s Outside the Walls, at Rome.*
I keep finding clips saying that Theodoric de Niem, Secretary to John XXIII, spoke of her at the Council…but I’m not understanding what these clips are.
Does anyone know what this is?
It talks about the Vatican librarian including her in the canon of Popes as John VIII…
library.ibb.net/popejoan/
.