I hate to be that guy, but…
This video gives me the heebie jeebies.
Smells very strongly of universalism.
Yeah, I get that he is calling for dialogue and all that. But seriously. Look at the way this is filmed. Especially the part at the end where the image of the infant king is placed alongside all the other religious symbols. Everything about this video seems to convey the idea that all religions are the same and there is nothing special about Christ or Christianity, and all we need to do is love each other (Edited). To have such a message coming from the vicar of Christ… this is very concerning.
It is more concerning still tto say "** all** you have to do is love each other" as if it were a piece of cake...
This could very well be done without the need to forsake the great commission. It’s all well and good to promote dialogue and peace. It’s another thing to communicate unviersalism. That is an evil in itself.It is more concerning still tto say “** all** you have to do is love each other” as if it were a piece of cake…
Give me a break. If we cannot sometimes live peacefully with our own family ,friends and relatives…
At least he is trying something instead of remaining sitting down and feeling " superior".
79 years old and on the move all over to foster peace.
(Edited)
The imagery is obviously concerning, but the thing that gets me the most is the apparent surrender to the idea that it is impossible to figure out the truth (when the Pope speaks of “the one certainty”). I get it–it really does seem that way sometimes–the faith seems so credible to me, why can’t other people who are apparently of good will figure it out too? It’s not a new problem. The Liberals in the 18th and 19th centuries saw this problem and proposed only reason and natural truth as knowable. Then, when people still were divided on what was truth using reason alone, they essentially gave up and subjectivism or modernism prevailed.I hate to be that guy, but…
This video gives me the heebie jeebies.
Smells very strongly of universalism.
Yeah, I get that he is calling for dialogue and all that. But seriously. Look at the way this is filmed. Especially the part at the end where the image of the infant king is placed alongside all the other religious symbols. Everything about this video seems to convey the idea that all religions are the same and there is nothing special about Christ or Christianity, and all we need to do is love each other (Edited). To have such a message coming from the vicar of Christ… this is very concerning.
w2.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20130629_enciclica-lumen-fidei.htmlFaith was thus understood either as a leap in the dark, to be taken in the absence of light, driven by blind emotion, or as a subjective light, capable perhaps of warming the heart and bringing personal consolation, but not something which could be proposed to others as an objective and shared light which points the way. Slowly but surely, however, it would become evident that the light of autonomous reason is not enough to illumine the future; ultimately the future remains shadowy and fraught with fear of the unknown. As a result, humanity renounced the search for a great light, Truth itself, in order to be content with smaller lights which illumine the fleeting moment yet prove incapable of showing the way. Yet in the absence of light everything becomes confused; it is impossible to tell good from evil, or the road to our destination from other roads which take us in endless circles, going nowhere.
This could very well be done without the need to forsake the great commission. It’s all well and good to promote dialogue and peace. It’s another thing to communicate unviersalism. That is an evil in itself.
He is the Pope and simple people who pray know it.
I hate to be that guy, but…
This video gives me the heebie jeebies.
Smells very strongly of universalism.
Yeah, I get that he is calling for dialogue and all that. But seriously. Look at the way this is filmed. Especially the part at the end where the image of the infant king is placed alongside all the other religious symbols. Everything about this video seems to convey the idea that all religions are the same and there is nothing special about Christ or Christianity, and all we need to do is love each other (Edited). To have such a message coming from the vicar of Christ… this is very concerning.
A living person cannot be said to have baptism by either desire or blood.Any believer – Christian, Jew, Muslim, Buddhist, other – who loves God and neighbor must be in the state of grace. Outside of the state of grace, there is no true selfless spiritual love of God or neighbor. So if non-Christian believers love, then they must have received a baptism of desire or blood.
Fallen sinners only enter the state of grace by some form of baptism. And then certainly they are children of God, having love, faith, hope, and all the virtues.
Why not? Every form of baptism must occur before death. We cannot be absolutely certain in each particular case as to who has received the baptism of desire or blood. But we can be certain that, in general, many people have, since God’s grace never fails to bear fruit.A living person cannot be said to have baptism by either desire or blood.
Well, if they haven’t died, then clearly they can’t be martyrs, because they haven’t died, which excludes baptism by blood. And if they’re alive, and they have access to water and to another human being, then by not having themselves baptized they are demonstrating that they do not desire to be baptized. The easiest thing would be to ask the Buddhist, Muslim or Jew from the video “do you desire baptism?” and just see what they say. There was a priest right there who could have had them all set in just a few minutes.Why not? Every form of baptism must occur before death. We cannot be absolutely certain in each particular case as to who has received the baptism of desire or blood. But we can be certain that, in general, many people have, since God’s grace never fails to bear fruit.
catholicnews.com/services/englishnews/2015/new-vatican-document-reflects-on-relations-between-catholics-jews.cfmThe easiest thing would be to ask …
Jew from the video “do you desire baptism?” and just see what they say. There was a priest right there who could have had them all set in just a few minutes.
I was specifically responding to the notion that a living non-Catholic can be considered to already have baptism either by blood or by desire. Thanks for sharing that link, I will read through it.catholicnews.com/services/englishnews/2015/new-vatican-document-reflects-on-relations-between-catholics-jews.cfm
“Here we confront the mystery of God’s work, which is not a matter of missionary efforts to convert Jews, but rather the expectation that the Lord will bring about the hour when we will be united.”
I realize the message in the OP is a general call to dialogue with other faiths. But as a side note to this, keep in mind the recent accord that went into effect between the Vatican and “Palestine”. Keep in mind the recent and ongoing stabbings by muslim/palestinians in Jerusalem and throughout Israel that stemmed from fear that Israel was changing their status towards their presence on the Temple Mount. Keep in mind that anti-zionist rabbis are getting louder and louder. Keep in mind Buddhism seems to be a religious flavor packet that many attempt to stir in with any religion or secular walk of life, especially pop culture(Karma,etc.). No matter what anyone’s religious, secular or political view on modern Israel are, or what real estate interest they have there, time is moving forward, so does Israel and the progress of their nation. From here on out, will modern Israel be a dividing point to any of these four religious figures presented in the video?Pope Francis, a Buddhist lama, a rabbi, a priest, and a Muslim leader appear in a new 90-second video designed to publicize the Pope’s general prayer intention for January: …
More…
Didn’t you learn anything from the video? If everybody brings a symbol of their religion for show and tell, there won’t be any more wars!From here on out, will modern Israel be a dividing point to any of these four religious figures presented in the video?
Baptism of desire can be implicit. The person who believes in God, loves God and neighbor, in full cooperation with grace, receives a baptism of desire, even without explicitly thinking “I’d like to be baptized”.Well, if they haven’t died, then clearly they can’t be martyrs, because they haven’t died, which excludes baptism by blood. And if they’re alive, and they have access to water and to another human being, then by not having themselves baptized they are demonstrating that they do not desire to be baptized. The easiest thing would be to ask the Buddhist, Muslim or Jew from the video “do you desire baptism?” and just see what they say. There was a priest right there who could have had them all set in just a few minutes.
I am not aware of any teaching that says a baptism of desire can be implicit. Catechumenate martyrs are preparing for baptism and desire to be baptized and then die before that desire is fulfilled, there’s nothing really implicit there. If you were to ask them “do you desire baptism” they would say “yes” and if, perhaps, they were confused on the matter, being martyred would bring about baptism by blood.Baptism of desire can be implicit. The person who believes in God, loves God and neighbor, in full cooperation with grace, receives a baptism of desire, even without explicitly thinking “I’d like to be baptized”.
Catechumenate martyrs receive the state of grace prior to death. No one can receive baptism of any kind after death.