Pope requests TLM in every parish?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JRKH
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The MP was not about promoting increased use of the EF so talk of pushing it on all parishes flus in the face of it.
No - it doesn’t. I’m honestly a bit disturbed by such open hostility to the plans of the Pope.

The MP didn’t restrict the TLM in any sense. It didn’t say “You may not celebrate the TLM if nobody asks for it”, nor did it restrict the right of the Pope to mandate it for every parish.

I understand that change is sometimes hard to accept, but you really have to get with times on this one.
 
That may be true in your area but not mine. Locally there are parishes that have an interest and now offer th EF at least once a month and others that don’t and have no plans to do so.
Well, then they’d better start makin plans 😃
 
No - it doesn’t. I’m honestly a bit disturbed by such open hostility to the plans of the Pope.

The MP didn’t restrict the TLM in any sense. It didn’t say “You may not celebrate the TLM if nobody asks for it”, nor did it restrict the right of the Pope to mandate it for every parish.

I understand that change is sometimes hard to accept, but you really have to get with times on this one.
It is a reversal to go from making it available as described to forcing it on all parishes. It is just barely a year since the MP was issued so what could be the reason for such a possible reversal?
 
It is a reversal to go from making it available as described to forcing it on all parishes. It is just barely a year since the MP was issued so what could be the reason for such a possible reversal?
No… it would be a reversal if the MP had said “ONLY those who request it may have it”. That’s not what it said. It laid down a framework by which people may have the TLM, in order that it may become more common in the Church.

It’s an interim document, since the Pope hasn’t yet abrogated it and mandated a TLM for every parish. That’s a long-term goal.

The fact that you’re so unhappy about the progress in the Church, Eilish, makes me certain that we’re going in the right direction.
 
Maybe we should wait until something a little more official than the Telegraph.
More official than Cardinal Castrillon? The man in charge of all matters concerning the EF?

I think we can be certain what the intention of the Pope is. It’ll just be some time before official implementation occurs.
 
No… it would be a reversal if the MP had said “ONLY those who request it may have it”. That’s not what it said. It laid down a framework by which people may have the TLM, in order that it may become more common in the Church.

It’s an interim document, since the Pope hasn’t yet abrogated it and mandated a TLM for every parish. That’s a long-term goal.

The fact that you’re so unhappy about the progress in the Church, Eilish, makes me certain that we’re going in the right direction.
It is a reversal if it is about forcing all parishes to offer it.
 
No, it’s not.
Of course it is.

Currently there are multiple ways the EF can be brought to a parish:
a priest can offer a private mass using it
a pastor could make it part of the schedule
a stable group could request it (and work thru any difficulties
using tools in place from the MP).

To force it on all parishes spits on these and puts the pope in a very negative light.
 
Of course it is.

Currently there are multiple ways the EF can be brought to a parish:
a priest can offer a private mass using it
a pastor could make it part of the schedule
a stable group could request it (and work thru any difficulties
using tools in place from the MP).

To force it on all parishes spits on these and puts the pope in a very negative light.
No… it simply highlights the interim nature of the document. The long-term goal is to have a TLM in every parish, which will likely only be mandated after the MP has had a few years to work.
 
No… it simply highlights the interim nature of the document. The long-term goal is to have a TLM in every parish, which will likely only be mandated after the MP has had a few years to work.
Where did the pope indicate this
'interim nature" of the MP and that his reasoning/explanation for it was less than accurate?
 
Where did the pope indicate this
'interim nature" of the MP and that his reasoning/explanation for it was less than accurate?
The interim nature is to be found in the fact that the Pope foresees the celebration of the TLM in every parish. Clearly, the document is meant to help facilitate further steps towards reform. It wasn’t necessary for him to divulge this fact in the MP.

There was nothing innacurate in the letter accompanying the Motu Proprio.
 
The interim nature is to be found in the fact that the Pope foresees the celebration of the TLM in every parish. Clearly, the document is meant to help facilitate further steps towards reform. It wasn’t necessary for him to divulge this fact in the MP.

There was nothing innacurate in the letter accompanying the Motu Proprio.
If the EF is forced on any parish then there would be proof the MP & companion document were inaccurate at best.
 
If the EF is forced on any parish then there would be proof the MP & companion document were inaccurate at best.
No, not at all.

The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate some “innacuracy” by quoting the document itself and demonstrating it.
 
No, not at all.

The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate some “innacuracy” by quoting the document itself and demonstrating it.
There is no “burden of proof” without the future action(s) being taken.

At this time, given how the MP is constructed, there is no need to push it on all parishes and no provision to do so - especially after only 1 year.
 
There is no “burden of proof” without the future action(s) being taken.

At this time, given how the MP is constructed, there is no need to push it on all parishes and no provision to do so - especially after only 1 year.
The supreme legislator is the Pope, and he can legislate anything he wants, even if it renders unnecessary provisions he gave previously.

Stop treating the MP as if it has the final say in the matter. The Pope has the final say. He’s the one who promulgated the MP, which is obviously an interim document. He can change the provisions at a later date once the circumstances for the introduction of the TLM into every parish are more favourable.

You’re obviously sour at the progress in the Church. Do everyone a favour and take your nitpicking elsewhere.
 
The supreme legislator is the Pope, and he can legislate anything he wants, even if it renders unnecessary provisions he gave previously.

Stop treating the MP as if it has the final say in the matter. The Pope has the final say. He’s the one who promulgated the MP, which is obviously an interim document. He can change the provisions at a later date once the circumstances for the introduction of the TLM into every parish are more favourable.

You’re obviously sour at the progress in the Church. Do everyone a favour and take your nitpicking elsewhere.
The church makes changes and progress slowly and the MP is barely a year old.

The pope does not seem to be the type to overturn his own work after such a short time.
 
The church makes changes and progress slowly and the MP is barely a year old.

The pope does not seem to be the type to overturn his own work after such a short time.
No document has been issued which abrogates the Motu Proprio and makes mandatory the celebration of the TLM in every parish. We’re talking about a long-term goal - something the Pope foresees. It could be a decade or more before such a thing happens.
 
No document has been issued which abrogates the Motu Proprio and makes mandatory the celebration of the TLM in every parish. We’re talking about a long-term goal - something the Pope foresees. It could be a decade or more before such a thing happens.
With all the things of greater importance to be done, it may never happen. Only time will tell.
 
With all the things of greater importance to be done, it may never happen. Only time will tell.
I’m convinced that there is nothing of greater importance to the life of the Church and of the world than the common use of the Traditional Latin Mass. This magnificent liturgy will transform and enrich the faith of millions with its humble, beautiful prayers and its extraordinary focus on the glory and mystery of the Eucharistic sacrifice.

Save the liturgy, save the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top