Pope wearing skullcap

  • Thread starter Thread starter maximilianimus
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The name is zucchetto, which is Italian for zuccini as in the fruit, because when you lay it on a table, it looks like a slice. In Hebrew it’s called a Kippa and in Yiddish a Yamulke.

The tradition goes way back, long before the time of Christ. In Jewish liturgy, men cover their heads when entering the temple. This is still the case today. The high priests wore special headdress when it was their year to serve.

Until the late 1800s deacons, priests, bishops, monks and friars covered our heads with a skull cap, each according to his place in the church. For example, if you were a secular priest, you wore a black one. If you were a bishop, the color is “purple”. If you’re a cardinal, then it’s reddish. Monks and friars wore the color according to the color of the order. For example the Dominicans wear a white habit, but a black mantle over the habit. They wore a black skullcap. I don’t know if the Carmelites and Augustinians ever wore one. Franciscans wore one the same color as the habit: brown, grey or black. The Cistercians wore a black one, etc.

Today, it is still permissible for diocesan clergy and religious of certain orders to wear one, but the custom is rarely used because we no longer wear a tonsure. The skullcap is difficult to keep on your head when you have a lot of hair. It tends to slide. If you notice the pope and bishops, they’re always fiddling with it. If you’re a friar or monk, you’re probably outside a lot more than the pope or a bishop. The last thing you want to do is to run after that thing when the wind blows. We used to sew a comb on the inside to keep it on. Jewish men often fasten it with hair pins. You can also buy special pins to hold it on. I have one, but have not worn it in years. I look cute in it too. 😃

To answer your second question, no the pope and no one else who prays with his head covered is wrong. We, friars and monks, still pray with our cowls over our head. Bishops still pray with their zuchettos on. It is taken off during the Canon of the mass and it’s not put back on until after Communion. If you’re wearing a cowl you do the same thing.

It is never worn at the moment of the sacrifice and while Christ is physically present. The head is always uncovered during that time. The reason again goes back to Jewish history. The purpose of covering one’s head was two-fold, a) to remind us that God was above us (an external means of remembering to be humble) and b) to remind us that God is always close. He is above us, but not far away.

Once the preface begins you begin to get ready for have God substantially in front of you on the altar. The head covering is not needed. Your thoughts need to be focused on the immediate presence of God before you, not above you. That was the idea of that ancient teaching. You took it off when you prayed to God who was in your immediate presence, at all other times of prayer, you kept it on. Orthodox Jews take it off only for bed and bath. Popes and bishops can take it off at any time.

Those of us who may choose to wear it also take it off in the presence of the pope, unless he instructs us to keep it on. You will notice that at the Vatican, the clergy rarely wear it in an audience with His Holiness. It’s worn in an assembly, which is different from an audience. When greeting the pope, you always doff it as you shake his hand or kiss his ring, depending on your custom. That custom varies from Church to Church and from one religious order to another, but not the custom of doffing the skullcap. That’s pretty universal among Latin Catholics.

Fraternally,

Br. JR,

I wonder if it gets its name from the Zucchini flower rather than the fruit. (Just to add to the conversation but nothing to do with the debate in the UK we call them Courgettes and regard them as a vegetable. Separated by a common language sigh)
 
Brother JR, a silly question unrelated to the skullcap (but related to Franciscan priests not being distinct from the other Brothers); with the Friars of the Renewal, they have a fellow who goes by Father Stan Fortuna. Ever since I heard of the man, everyone refers to him as Father. Wikipedia and other sites call him Father as well.

I’m assuming that this is a special case and is not common?
 
I wonder if it gets its name from the Zucchini flower rather than the fruit. (Just to add to the conversation but nothing to do with the debate in the UK we call them Courgettes and regard them as a vegetable. Separated by a common language sigh)
It is considered a vegetable here too, but technically it is both. It is the fruit of the zucchini plant because it disseminates the seeds. (like apples, plums, peaches, etc). So we will put it this way: all fruit are vegetables but not all vegetables are fruit. 😃
 
I wonder if it gets its name from the Zucchini flower rather than the fruit. (Just to add to the conversation but nothing to do with the debate in the UK we call them Courgettes and regard them as a vegetable. Separated by a common language sigh)
Etymology: Italian zucchetto, ultimately variant diminutive of zucca (“gourd, squash”), as in zucchini.
Source: en.wiktionary.org/wiki/zucchetto

Wikipedia says that: “Its name derives from its resemblance to half a pumpkin.”
Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zucchetto
 
I think that probably I am in the minority here, but I am quite sure that the origin of “zucchetto” is not exactly what has been described here. Zucchetto (a.k.a. zuccata, zucchetta) is the head cover, and “zucca” is another figurative term to describe the head (e.g. avere sale in zucca, to have salt in the head or to be wise). This is similar to the use of “courge” in French.

I would also like to add that other names for the zucchetto are “pileolus” from the Latin head cover pileus and “solideo” from the Latin expression soli Deo tullitur (to be taken off only in front of God)
 
Brother JR, a silly question unrelated to the skullcap (but related to Franciscan priests not being distinct from the other Brothers); with the Friars of the Renewal, they have a fellow who goes by Father Stan Fortuna. Ever since I heard of the man, everyone refers to him as Father. Wikipedia and other sites call him Father as well.

I’m assuming that this is a special case and is not common?
When the Franciscans of the Renewal began, they kicked off the renewal of the Franciscan family, hence their name. As the renewal grows and the years pass, other areas of Franciscan life have been examined.

The Franciscans of the Renewal began by focusing on two things: 1) Getting back to the poverty of the 13th century and 2) getting out of parish work, because it’s not a Franciscan ministry. It was one that Franciscans took on to help bishops. It was to be temporary. Temporary has lasted for about 200 years.

Like everything else, each layer builds on the layer beneath it. Once those two issues were addressed by one group, the next issue to be addressed was community life, our relationship with the laity, and our ministries.

The result was that as we looked back at the 13th century, we did not find anywhere in the early sources that Francis intended to found an order for priests. He never intended to found any kind of an order. He simply intended to do penance. Men came to him and joined him in the life of penance and poverty. Some of these men were priests, deacons, bishops, even cardinals, but most were laymen. They banded together to do penance and to preach the Gospel. Francis called them the Little Brothers, hence the term Fratres Minores. Each man was known as Brother, except Francis whom they called either Francis or Father. This fraternal equality is being recovered by all Franciscans. Many communities only use the title Father for the superior. They use Friar, Frater or Brother.

In regards to the laity, during the Renaissance up until the 20th century the laity had a strong voice among Franciscans. Laymen were our benefactors and the friars felt compelled to account to them. However, going back to the sources, we never had such a tradition. The friars always depended on the laity to support their apostolic work, but the laity understood that the authority is vested in the superior. The superior alone decides how resources, including donations, are used. However, if the laity designates a donation for a specific purpose, let’s say for the orphans, the superior must see to it that it goes to the orphans. But he does not have to give an account of whether it was used to buy food, clothes or pay the plummer to repair the sink that the orphans broke.

The laity also exercised a great deal of authority in assignments. Franciscans depended on the laity to build houses. Laymen of influence usually had the superior’s and the bishop’s ear. They often influenced the major superior in deciding who was assigned to what house and who the superior of the house should be. If they had a relative in the community, they bribed to get their loved ones special assignments.

Again, the original community did not depend on anyone for this. Francis made all of the assignments. When the community grew larger, the provincial superiors made the assignments. The brothers were not allowed to ask anyone to intervene on their behalf, nor was the request of the lay faithful taken into account. The brothers were assigned according to the needs of the community, not according to the needs of the lay faithful. Today, we’re returning to this.

Ministries had to be addressed. We were doing a lot of priestly work. The position was that there is a shortage of priests. However, the shortage of priests is the Church’s problem, not the problem of the religious orders. Franciscans found themselves having a surplus of priests. While there were men needed to run soup kitchens, do street ministry, run shelters, pregnancy centers, work with youth, do retreat ministry, teach, go to the foreign missions, do street preaching, live as hermits, we were putting men in parishes, hospitals and other places to do priestly work. The result was that we had to ordain a lot of men. There is a pulling back into other areas of ministry that do not require Holy Orders. As a result less of our men are being ordained, even though all of them are being trained with enough philosophy and theology to be priests and theologians. Some, such as me, have trained priests, but have never become priests. Francis himself trained priests, but never became one. Anthony of Padua trained priests, but did not become a priest until 15 years into his religious life, about three years before he died. Yet, he was the most remarkable preacher of his time.

So you see, each community has built on what the other community has started. The beauty of it is that we’re slowly moving back to very small religious communities where there is a lot of intimacy, fraternal life and common vision and mission. The large religious order with 1.7 million is like running a country without boundaries. The smaller communities between 10 and 200 men are real brotherhood where people know each other well and depend on each other. You break them down into small houses of two to five.
 
Other Franciscans have done even more for the renewal. The Franciscans of the Eucharist have returned Eucharistic adoration to the Franciscan family. The Franciscans of peace have returned entire friaries without priests. The Franciscans of Life (my community) have returned to the original model of consecrated and secular brothers sharing the same life and making the same commitment to a life of penance and service to the voiceless. The Conventual Franciscans have dismantled the Father - Brother system to create a united community of brothers, even though about 75% of them are ordained.

As the renewal continues, each community recovers one of the early attributes of the order from the 13th century. The idea is to bring 13th century religious life into the 21st century rather than replacing the 13th century with the 21st, which is what we did in the past.
It is considered a vegetable here too, but technically it is both. It is the fruit of the zucchini plant because it disseminates the seeds. (like apples, plums, peaches, etc). So we will put it this way: all fruit are vegetables but not all vegetables are fruit. 😃
I always call it a fruit because it has seeds. I’ve always eaten it as a veggie.
I think that probably I am in the minority here, but I am quite sure that the origin of “zucchetto” is not exactly what has been described here. Zucchetto (a.k.a. zuccata, zucchetta) is the head cover, and “zucca” is another figurative term to describe the head (e.g. avere sale in zucca, to have salt in the head or to be wise). This is similar to the use of “courge” in French.

I would also like to add that other names for the zucchetto are “pileolus” from the Latin head cover pileus and “solideo” from the Latin expression soli Deo tullitur (to be taken off only in front of God)
Zucchetto was in use in Italy referring to the zucchini. Solideo was the term that the clergy used, but it never really stuck. The expression “Soli Deo Tullitur” is Latin, but it comes from the Jews. It was carried over into Latin Christianity by the Jewish Christians. The early Jews wore shawls and later they wore a kippa. The first Christians were Jews. They would go to the temple every Saturday and covered their heads. Only the high priest took off his head covering when offering the sacrifice. From there the expression “to be taken off only in front of God”. Jewish Christians brought this custom with them and it was generalized to the Gentiles. We see it present in the Easter Churches as well. They too adopted the practice of head dress from the apostles who founded those Churches. They developed some very elaborate and regal forms of head dress, while others kept what look like a black shawl over a hat. These are very Eastern customs.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
 
…Zucchetto was in use in Italy referring to the zucchini. Solideo was the term that the clergy used, but it never really stuck. The expression “Soli Deo Tullitur” is Latin, but it comes from the Jews. It was carried over into Latin Christianity by the Jewish Christians. The early Jews wore shawls and later they wore a kippa. The first Christians were Jews. They would go to the temple every Saturday and covered their heads. Only the high priest took off his head covering when offering the sacrifice. From there the expression “to be taken off only in front of God”. Jewish Christians brought this custom with them and it was generalized to the Gentiles. We see it present in the Easter Churches as well. They too adopted the practice of head dress from the apostles who founded those Churches. They developed some very elaborate and regal forms of head dress, while others kept what look like a black shawl over a hat. These are very Eastern customs.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
I think that I disagree with the association of zucchetto and zucchini (zucchine) because of the shape of the zucchini that is different from the one of a zucca. I guess that we will not close on that. 🙂

I completely agree with the Jewish roots for solideo. What is interesting is that until 40 years ago lay people in Italy used to wear a skullcap called papalina in reference to the pope’s zucchetto. When I was a kid I used to wear a papalina all the time during summer.
 
There are 2 shapes of zucchini: the long tubular ones, and the flat, roundish ones.😉
 
Father Jay,

May I ask a question? I understand the part about the Franciscans re-emphasizing brotherhood in the communities. I am wondering if this new emphasis extends to the OFS?🙂
 
There are 2 shapes of zucchini: the long tubular ones, and the flat, roundish ones.😉
When I first heard the explanation, I though the flat rounded ones, not the tubular ones. Though I love both, especially in bread. 😃
Father Jay,

May I ask a question? I understand the part about the Franciscans re-emphasizing brotherhood in the communities. I am wondering if this new emphasis extends to the OFS?🙂
I’m not sure if I understand your question. Can you restate a little differently? Thanks,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
 
  1. "]Brother Maximilian Kolbe, FFV

  1. All of these are Franciscan Friars or Brothers, whichever way you want to call us. In which picture or pictures are there no deacons, priests or bishops? 😃

    Fraternally,

    Br. JR, FFV 🙂

    I only see you in one of the pictures so I can only point out one Brother Superior. ;😃
 
I only see you in one of the pictures so I can only point out one Brother Superior. ;😃
Actually there are three superiors among those pictures. But the question was, which picture or pictures has NO ordained brothers.

No ordained brothers = no deacons, priests or bishops.

😃 I’m loving this.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
 
Actually there are three superiors among those pictures. But the question was, which picture or pictures has NO ordained brothers.

No ordained brothers = no deacons, priests or bishops.

😃 I’m loving this.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
The one you are in. 😛
 
I’m not sure if I understand your question. Can you restate a little differently? Thanks,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
I think Luigi is wondering if a secular priest joins the OFS, if he is called Brother or Father.

My question earlier was if we should actually call “Father” Stan “Brother” Stan. I’ve thought about mentioning to people “he’s actually Brother Stan”, but figured it wasn’t worth the hassle.
 
I think Luigi is wondering if a secular priest joins the OFS, if he is called Brother or Father.

My question earlier was if we should actually call “Father” Stan “Brother” Stan. I’ve thought about mentioning to people “he’s actually Brother Stan”, but figured it wasn’t worth the hassle.
Because the OFS is a secular order, they keep their secular titles. Fr. Mr, Miss, Ms, Mrs, Dr, etc.

As for Fr. Stan, you always go by whatever that particular community uses. I know that when the Franciscans of the Renewal refer to themselves they say “the friars”. When they want to distinguish I’ve heard them say, “a friar” and “a friar priest”. The former is not ordained and the latter is.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
 
There are 2 shapes of zucchini: the long tubular ones, and the flat, roundish ones.😉
There are more than two shapes and the only ones that could count in favour of the theory are the tonda di Nizza or the tonda di Piacenza, the others are small zucche.

Try to get in your zucca that I am right! :D:D:D
 
Sorry I was unclear (as usual )
Let me try again :o
I contacted EWTN recently
They didn’t know what an OFS was 😦 Tad bit of a disappointment, TBH.
I am asking does the call to brotherhood extend to the OFS, or
is it just in the 1st (and by extension) 2nd orders?
Put another way, if there was a room full of all 3 orders,
would we all be addressed as brother?*

*women as sister, obviously
 
Sorry I was unclear (as usual )
Let me try again :o
I contacted EWTN recently
They didn’t know what an OFS was 😦 Tad bit of a disappointment, TBH.
I am asking does the call to brotherhood extend to the OFS, or
is it just in the 1st (and by extension) 2nd orders?
Put another way, if there was a room full of all 3 orders,
would we all be addressed as brother?*

*women as sister, obviously
Let me speak to the first point. That you called EWTN and they did not know what the OFS is does not come as a surprise. Before Mother Angelica retired she had Cardinal Sean O’Malley, OFM Cap on her show. She did not know that the OFS is an order.

She said something referring to them as an association and the Cardinal quickly jumped in and said, “No no no. They OFS is a real order as is the Order of Poor Clares. St. Francis wanted to found a family.” Mother Angelica was surprised to learn this.

When she founded her community of friars, they wrote into their constitutions that they are a clerical public association. This makes them a religious community of deacons and priests. Those friars who are neither deacons nor priests don’t have the same rights as the other friars. Everyone was stunned, because there has never been a Franciscan community of men that is a congregation for clergy.

They’re wonderful people over there, but they don’t know a lot about Franciscanism outside of their own circle. The friars are more educated on it, because they get around and they see other Franciscans. We’re beginning to see a big difference between them today and when they started.

To your second question, traditionally, the secular Franciscans were referred to as Brother or Sister. In 1978, Pope Paul VI rewrote their rule, just before he died. He took out the titles. Now here is the interesting part. There is no prohibition in the new rule. It’s just not mentioned. If I were to tell you that it is prohibited, I’d be wrong. It’s not there. If I were to tell you that it’s permitted, I’d be wrong, because it’s not there. My best response is that each region makes up it own policy on this matter.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, FFV 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top