H
Hatikvah
Guest
Martin Luther especially, John Calvin, John Knox all taught the view of the Pope as antichrist. Some noted Protestants who have held to that view include Charles Spurgeon (Baptist), Archbishop Thomas Cranmer of Canterbury (English Reformation under Henry VIII, Edward VI), and John Wesley (Methodism/Wesleyanism). [Source]
The view was understandably political rather than theological at first, with Martin Luther decrying the simony and abuse of indulgences he found in Rome, along with other subjects in his Ninety-Five Theses. To differentiate, the initial political changes in the Protestant Reformation are called the Magisterial Reformation, with the initial religious changes being called the Radical Reformation.
Some evangelicals today seriously hold to this view, especially Calvinists, and Jehovah’s Witnesses eschatology may permit that view (though some views have been changed since the 2009 International Convention).
It’s pretty ridiculous to me: why would the position of Pope, which has since had many people wilfully brought to faith in Jesus around the world and allowed for them to be saved, be so sinister as to deserve such a title?
The view was understandably political rather than theological at first, with Martin Luther decrying the simony and abuse of indulgences he found in Rome, along with other subjects in his Ninety-Five Theses. To differentiate, the initial political changes in the Protestant Reformation are called the Magisterial Reformation, with the initial religious changes being called the Radical Reformation.
Some evangelicals today seriously hold to this view, especially Calvinists, and Jehovah’s Witnesses eschatology may permit that view (though some views have been changed since the 2009 International Convention).
It’s pretty ridiculous to me: why would the position of Pope, which has since had many people wilfully brought to faith in Jesus around the world and allowed for them to be saved, be so sinister as to deserve such a title?