Popes and the sainthood

  • Thread starter Thread starter Contrabass101
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Contrabass101

Guest
I was looking at the list of popes today, and came to wonder about something.

Of the first 49 popes, only one is not a Saint. But after that, sainthood becomes much rarer among them.

I don’t know what that means, but I thought it quite odd. Any thoughts?
  • CB
 
It is important to realise that there was no formal canonisation of saints until the canonisation of St Ulrich by Pope John XV in 993. Up to then, and (it seems to me) especially in the 5th and 6th centuries, holy people were proclaimed saints by acclamation of the people. In the case of Ireland, if you think of all those involved in the spreading of Christianity in 5th and 6th century Ireland all of them are referred to as saints - Patrick, Brigid, Columcille, Brendan, Enda, Ciara, Ciaran, Kevin, Mel…the list is endless, but all these saints were known in the communities in which they served as being holy men and women and on their death were proclaimed to be saints by the people. I expect the same sort of thing happened in relation to the early popes, but their naming as saints was probably largely due to the fact that they were the successor of Peter - appointed by God as Bishop of Rome. Certainly from today’s point of view, I wouldn’t read this negatively - as in that our most recent popes are lacking holiness: there are popes even from living memory who are very much on the path to sainthood - Blessed John XXIII, Venerable Pius XII and John Paul II. Indeed, there are many other people - Popes and laypeople - who are certainly saints but because of a tighter canonisation process will not be officially proclaimed as such by the Church.
 
It is important to realise that there was no formal canonisation of saints until the canonisation of St Ulrich by Pope John XV in 993. Up to then, and (it seems to me) especially in the 5th and 6th centuries, holy people were proclaimed saints by acclamation of the people. In the case of Ireland, if you think of all those involved in the spreading of Christianity in 5th and 6th century Ireland all of them are referred to as saints - Patrick, Brigid, Columcille, Brendan, Enda, Ciara, Ciaran, Kevin, Mel…the list is endless, but all these saints were known in the communities in which they served as being holy men and women and on their death were proclaimed to be saints by the people. I expect the same sort of thing happened in relation to the early popes, but their naming as saints was probably largely due to the fact that they were the successor of Peter - appointed by God as Bishop of Rome. Certainly from today’s point of view, I wouldn’t read this negatively - as in that our most recent popes are lacking holiness: there are popes even from living memory who are very much on the path to sainthood - Blessed John XXIII, Venerable Pius XII and John Paul II. Indeed, there are many other people - Popes and laypeople - who are certainly saints but because of a tighter canonisation process will not be officially proclaimed as such by the Church.
It seems that you are saying that if someone isn’t proclaimed a saint doesn’t mean they aren’t it is just that it isn’t a formal pronouncement.

That, in general, seems logical to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top