C
CilladeRoma
Guest
Being a homosexual is NOT a mental disorder.the priesthood is not for the mentally disordered.
Homosexual sex is disordered because it is not pro-creative.
Being a homosexual is NOT a mental disorder.the priesthood is not for the mentally disordered.
Why is it not a mental disorder?Being a homosexual is NOT a mental disorder.
Homosexual sex is disordered because it is not pro-creative.
I agree with this. I think there are far more important factors to consider when a man is discerning the priesthood. Not to say that his sexuality isn’t important, but we are not our sexuality.have seldom heard debate about whether or not an alcoholic or someone battling some sort of addiction at all should or shouldn’t enter into the seminary. For some reason, it is always homosexuals, and for some reason, homosexuality is front and center of so much discussion. Some can’t stop talking about it.
i think your bringing up a good point here.This may be your experience, but not mine, and certainly not the gay men & women I know.
Good question. We’d both agree they’re all downright sinful. Are they mental disorders? I don’t know if they are intrinsically spawned by mental orders, though these can all be symptoms of mental disorders.Is mastubating, having adulterous sex, fornicating or watching porn a mental disorder?
None of these things are ordered to procreation, or even unity.
Do you consider these things mental disorders?
If someone applied to the seminary and defined themselves as an adulterous masturbator, I’m not sure if that would indicate that they are a good candidate for the priesthood, even if they reported they were no longer active in these activities.Is mastubating, having adulterous sex, fornicating or watching porn a mental disorder?
In all fairness, I don’t think Callade is suggesting that the individual is active in homosexuality. However, I do agree that if someone has that inclination and struggles with it that severely, then seminary probably wouldn’t be the right move until it has been addressed.If someone applied to the seminary and defined themselves as an adulterous masturbator, I’m not sure if that would indicate that they are a good candidate for the priesthood, even if they reported they were no longer active in these activities.
How many of those people you know are active in the LGBT community and take part in the “gay lifestyle?”This may be your experience, but not mine, and certainly not the gay men & women I know.
This is obvious since overwhelming majority of people are heterosexual and that 75% or more of Catholics disagree with something in regards to Church teaching.In fact, I know far many more heterosexual Catholics who see nothing inherently wrong with sex outside of marriage, masturbation, porn, etc. and see the Church’s stance on sexual morality as antiquated.
it’s a good question. But that really doesn’t have anything to do with why men with deep seated attraction to other men cannot be priests.My question is an honest one. If the majority of teacher sexual abuse happened between male teachers and female students, is it more likely to happen with priests now that “female” alter servers are becoming the new norm? Is it homosexuality that is the real issue or is it disordered hyper-sexuality?
Do I really have to spell it out?What is a “gay lifestyle”?
How is it any more a near occasion of sin for a homosexual person than a heterosexual person?The main reason is because it’s a near occasion to sin.
Because heterosexual priests do not live in the same house with women. But homosexual priests typically do live in the same house as other men (aka priests).How is it any more a near occasion of sin for a homosexual person than a heterosexual person?
If we’re not going into anecdotes (which I on’t think is the right criteria, but I’ll go with it too), I’m 33 and lived in Dupont Circle in DC for many years – this is the mecca of gay neighborhoods in the district. It is where the Gay Pride parades begin and end.Yes, please do.
I keep hearing about “gay lifestyle”, yet what most people seem to be talking about is what Hollywood wants us to see, not what the reality is.
Gay lifestyle is: Going to gay clubs, engaging in homosexual acts, etc.I keep hearing about “gay lifestyle”, yet what most people seem to be talking about is what Hollywood wants us to see, not what the reality is.
And again, you are OBVIOUSLY going to know far more heterosexual Catholics who have problems with Church teaching - that’s statistical certainty. And again, same sex attracted Catholics who practice their faith, agree 100% with Church teaching, and live chaste lives are NOT the issue.Edited to add: And, I know far more heterosexual Catholics who have problems with Church teaching on morality than I do gay people.
Again, something I keep hearing, but, I have never seen any actual evidence for the claims being made here.Plus, there is the sad fact hat we still have a number of seminaries that are filled with young men who are ACTIVELY practicing homosexual acts. In a lot of these dissent seminaries, undergraduate seminarians are NOT allowed to date girls (meaning they will be expelled for dating a girl or engaging in heterosexual acts), but the practice of homosexual acts is not banned (meaning they will NOT be expelled for engaging in homosexual acts).