P
phil8888
Guest
Hi, does porn gives unrealistic expectations for marriage? Esp. when considering the vocation of marriage, and do you think it can be a hindrance for marriage decision?
I am inclined to say “yes”. I’m going to analyze this not from the moral sense, as that is something that is quite common sense. Let’s look at this, rather, through a more scientific approach, but one that still shows the dangers of pornography.Hi, does porn gives unrealistic expectations for marriage? Esp. when considering the vocation of marriage, and do you think it can be a hindrance for marriage decision?
Just as a visit to a sewer will give you an unrealistic expectation of what to expect at the ocean.
As someone who semi-regularly views pornography I’m not quite sure that’s a fair assessment. I think pornography simply depicts sexual activity. I don’t know that it depicts that people constantly want to have sex simply that people have sex (of all kinds).Pornography depicts sexual activity as something that is just constantly wanted by women and men, when this is, of course, far from the truth. Indeed, men tend to be much more interested in sexual activity than women, but, there are still times when even guys are not interested in having sex. It is not a very common happening, but still, it does happen. While men do have high levels of testosterone in their youth, they are not machines. I can speak to this fact. I am an 18 year old guy. I struggle often with the temptations of lust and sexual activity. But there are times (and I am quite thankful for these times) when I do not feel really any temptation of lust.
And numerous movies and novels depict lawmen as something they’re not and priests as something they’re not and so on. Pornography is a sort of fiction; it is a given that it does not depict reality (assuming we’re not talking about home videos or something of that nature).Allow me now to show how pornography ruins that healthy sexual desire. Pornography makes it seem as though all women are lusting, sex-crazed machines that constantly desire all sexual activity no matter what it is. This is, of course, completely false. But the illusion of pornography makes it seem as such.
I still walk down the street and think far something closer to ‘she is beautiful’ (without the theological additions) than ‘I’d love to get me some of that.’ I would, however, go so far as to say that in my very limited personal experience (some) people look better naked. The form of the human body is a fantastic thing to behold in its abundant variations. While a person who assumed pornography depicts the true state of the world with regards to sex may think people look much different than they really do I don’t think this is a reasonable, realistic or common assumption. Further, if it is, it oughtn’t to be but I think that’s not to say that pornography shouldn’t exist but that people should realize that it’s not real.Let’s go back to me walking down the street, but, in this case, I am someone who often views pornography. I see this same beautiful young woman walking towards me. As someone with a pornography-damaged perception of women, instead of thinking, “Wow, she is beautiful. Lord, Your perfection is reflected by Your creation.” I’m more likely to think, “Wow, I’d love to get me some of that.” as I think of the pornography-inspired sexual adventures I’d have with this innocent young woman.
For some people, sure. The same goes for all movies. A Beautiful Mind can give people wrong ideas about schizophrenics. Gladiator can give people a false impression of ancient Rome. Both movies can cause people to have a skewed view of Russell Crowe!Hi, does porn gives unrealistic expectations for marriage?
I suppose there must be cases where it is, yes. I highly doubt that such cases are common, though.Esp. when considering the vocation of marriage, and do you think it can be a hindrance for marriage decision?
Heh, speak for yourself.If you believe porn represents real sex, yes. Real people rarely measure up to fantasy.
the porn habit destroys completely the ability to enter into marriage positively with proper intent and expectations, because one is already disposed to demean and objectify one’s partner, and the prospects for true intimacy, true self-giving love and the union God intended are dim. It causes as much damage as promiscuous sexual activity before marriage, and even more because while most people will stop that, at least for a while after marriage, the porn habit is likely to continue, so that person is constantly unfaithful to his or her spouse.Hi, does porn gives unrealistic expectations for marriage? Esp. when considering the vocation of marriage, and do you think it can be a hindrance for marriage decision?
Ah…two unmarried people having graphic sex isn’t real because…?And numerous movies and novels depict lawmen as something they’re not and priests as something they’re not and so on. Pornography is a sort of fiction; it is a given that it does not depict reality (assuming we’re not talking about home videos or something of that nature).
Further, if it is, it oughtn’t to be but I think that’s not to say that pornography shouldn’t exist but that people should realize that it’s not real.
.
Because it’s not real sex, that is to say it does not represent two (or more) real people having real sex in the privacy of their own bedroom (or kitchen &c). I suppose I wasn’t clear; of course the sex acts in pornography are real but they’re not real insofar as not very women, I presume, like impromptu anal sex or to be ejaculated upon despite the prevalence of these things in pornography. Does that make sense (honest question not a pedantic question, I’m not trying to talk down to you)?Ah…two unmarried people having graphic sex isn’t real because…?
Sure the plot isn’t real, but c’mon, the **plot **isn’t what’s most objectionable about porn.
OK, I understand what you’re saying. I thought you were implying that it’s not “real” sex in that it was simulated, and what we see on screen wasn’t what was happening.Because it’s not real sex, that is to say it does not represent two (or more) real people having real sex in the privacy of their own bedroom (or kitchen &c). I suppose I wasn’t clear; of course the sex acts in pornography are real but they’re not real insofar as not very women, I presume, like impromptu anal sex or to be ejaculated upon despite the prevalence of these things in pornography. Does that make sense (honest question not a pedantic question, I’m not trying to talk down to you)?
Wait, the plots aren’t real either?! There goes my dream of being a UPS delivery guy or a milkman…
Interesting; I usually skip that bit when my movies have bits like that.OK, I understand what you’re saying. I thought you were implying that it’s not “real” sex in that it was simulated, and what we see on screen wasn’t what was happening.
I think pizza delivery guys are statistically the most…um…common foil for the storyline.
While what Thomas says here is in general true, there is a difference between porn and movies. In our brains are biochemicals that will grow and go into higher states of readiness as well as neurons that will link up and connect in unique ways depending on the stimulation we received.And numerous movies and novels depict lawmen as something they’re not and priests as something they’re not and so on. Pornography is a sort of fiction; it is a given that it does not depict reality (assuming we’re not talking about home videos or something of that nature).
Loved this clear message!Absolutely.
Just as a visit to a sewer will give you an unrealistic expectation of what to expect at the ocean.