PP's Angel of Death

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris_LaRock
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Chris_LaRock

Guest
Margaret Sanger quotes
Founder of Planned Parenthood

Margaret Sanger founder of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, was a proponent of forced eugenics, segregation, abortion, birth control and sexual immorality. Here are some of her quotes.

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

“Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need … We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock.”
Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.

“Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.”
Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.”
[no source available at this time…]

“As an advocate of birth control I wish … to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation…On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”
Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics.”
Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying … demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism … [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”
Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on “The Cruelty of Charity,” pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.

“The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind.”
Margaret Sanger, quoted in Charles Valenza. “Was Margaret Sanger a Racist?”
Family Planning Perspectives, January-February 1985, page 44.

“The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.”
Margaret Sanger. Speech quoted in Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do. The Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference. Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City, November 11-12, 1921. Published by the Birth Control Review, Gothic Press, pages 172 and 174.

“The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order…”
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children…”
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“Give dysgenic groups [people with ‘bad genes’] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.”
Margaret Sanger, April 1932 Birth Control Review.

“As we celebrate the 100th birthday of Margaret Sanger, our outrageous and our courageous leader, we will probably find a number of areas in which we may find more about Margaret Sanger than we thought we wanted to know…”
Faye Wattleton, Past-president of Planned Parenthood

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, proposed the American Baby Code that states, “No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child… without a permit for parenthood”.

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, proposed the Population Congress with the aim, “…to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.”

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
 
Lord Have Mercy, Christ Have Mercy, Lord Have Mercy.

May Almighty God Forgive Us Our Sins and Bring Us To Life Everlasting…
–Amen–
 
Not really here to defend Sanger but it’s important to remember the time period we are talking. People like to forget that Henry Ford wouldn’t hire Jews at this time because he believed that a secret Zionist conspiracy was trying to control the world.

Genetics had just been born as a science and people would just starting to understand how evolution and selective breeding could change the outcome.

In Western “Scientific” society it was definitely “posh” to believe like this and state things like this because this was going to be the “future” as everyone seemed to understand it.

Nazi Germany took these idea to the extreme and helped to prove out the flaws in it as they tried to create their “super” Aryan race.

Modern geneticist understand that in a world sized population, mutation will creep back in or actual accelerate if the breeding processed is controlled too tightly.

While she was definitely wrong in many of her ideas, many “Christians” at the time were starting to believe in birth control as well because it was “the future” where women were equal with men and could do everything they could do!

Watching her devout Catholic mother die after giving birth to her 17 brothers and sisters definitely had a very negative impact on her. Through her education she obviously came to the believe, I’m sure at the behest of her “educated” friends at the time, that she (and they) knew more than God. That’s the bottom line I think.

Her desire to free women from the “bonds” of continual childbearing and her desire for a “better” humanity sadly failed and she definitely opened the door to further radicals who over time produced a society where many people fail to champion the things that make women and men different from each other. God created each of us with certain gifts the other sex will never have to the same degree. Sure, except for child birth and nursing, men and women can do many of the same things equally as well. I find it truly disheartening that those things though that are so uniquely woman are continaullly shuned and looked down upon by our modern culture.

It didn’t work out the way she thought… in some ways it’s better but in other ways it’s probably worse.

However in many ways I truly feel sorry for her. I believe she thought she was doing the right thing, how you get to the point she did from a Catholic upbringing is truly amazing… and as I said, very sad.

Joe
 
Not really here to defend Sanger but it’s important to remember the time period we are talking. People like to forget that Henry Ford wouldn’t hire Jews at this time because he believed that a secret Zionist conspiracy was trying to control the world.

Genetics had just been born as a science and people would just starting to understand how evolution and selective breeding could change the outcome.

In Western “Scientific” society it was definitely “posh” to believe like this and state things like this because this was going to be the “future” as everyone seemed to understand it.

Nazi Germany took these idea to the extreme and helped to prove out the flaws in it as they tried to create their “super” Aryan race.

Modern geneticist understand that in a world sized population, mutation will creep back in or actual accelerate if the breeding processed is controlled too tightly.

While she was definitely wrong in many of her ideas, many “Christians” at the time were starting to believe in birth control as well because it was “the future” where women were equal with men and could do everything they could do!

Watching her devout Catholic mother die after giving birth to her 17 brothers and sisters definitely had a very negative impact on her. Through her education she obviously came to the believe, I’m sure at the behest of her “educated” friends at the time, that she (and they) knew more than God. That’s the bottom line I think.

Her desire to free women from the “bonds” of continual childbearing and her desire for a “better” humanity sadly failed and she definitely opened the door to further radicals who over time produced a society where many people fail to champion the things that make women and men different from each other. God created each of us with certain gifts the other sex will never have to the same degree. Sure, except for child birth and nursing, men and women can do many of the same things equally as well. I find it truly disheartening that those things though that are so uniquely woman are continaullly shuned and looked down upon by our modern culture.

It didn’t work out the way she thought… in some ways it’s better but in other ways it’s probably worse.

However in many ways I truly feel sorry for her. I believe she thought she was doing the right thing, how you get to the point she did from a Catholic upbringing is truly amazing… and as I said, very sad.

Joe
But this woman created a company that is responsible for more deaths of innocent people than the nazis. I don’t feel sorry for her. The woman was a very wicked person, and will have to answer to God for all of the deaths her company has caused.
 
The woman was a very wicked person, and will have to answer to God for all of the deaths her company has caused.
Well, given that Margaret Sanger’s been dead since 1966, one can presume that any answering to God has already happened.
 
Well, given that Margaret Sanger’s been dead since 1966, one can presume that any answering to God has already happened.
True, but her actions from when she was alive are continuing to cause death today.

Her sins have snowballed, so can one assume that her punishment increases at PP continues it’s genicide?
 
True, but her actions from when she was alive are continuing to cause death today.

Her sins have snowballed, so can one assume that her punishment increases at PP continues it’s genicide?
Margaret Sanger is dead.

She’s been dead for over forty years.

She’s dead. As in, heart-stopped, all-brain-function-ceased, her body has decomposed, stone-cold dead.

Regardless of what her sins were in life, the fact remains that the woman is DEAD.

Continue flagellating her corpse if you must, but the fact remains that she’s dead. The continual Sanger-bashing I encounter has started to remind me of Monty Python’s “Dead Parrot” sketch:

“Margaret Sanger has passed on! She is no more! She has ceased to be! She’s expired and gone to meet her maker! She’s a stiff! Bereft of life, she rests in peace! If you hadn’t nailed her to the perch she’d be pushing up the daisies! Her metabolic processes are now history! She’s off the twig! She’s kicked the bucket, shuffled off this mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin’ Choir Invisible!!”

She’s DEAD. SO dead.
 
Margaret Sanger is dead.

She’s been dead for over forty years.

She’s dead. As in, heart-stopped, all-brain-function-ceased, her body has decomposed, stone-cold dead.

Regardless of what her sins were in life, the fact remains that the woman is DEAD.

Continue flagellating her corpse if you must, but the fact remains that she’s dead. The continual Sanger-bashing I encounter has started to remind me of Monty Python’s “Dead Parrot” sketch:

“Margaret Sanger has passed on! She is no more! She has ceased to be! She’s expired and gone to meet her maker! She’s a stiff! Bereft of life, she rests in peace! If you hadn’t nailed her to the perch she’d be pushing up the daisies! Her metabolic processes are now history! She’s off the twig! She’s kicked the bucket, shuffled off this mortal coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin’ Choir Invisible!!”

She’s DEAD. SO dead.
…and your post reminded me of this:
Ding dong, the witch is dead, which old witch, the wicked witch, ding dong, the wicked witch is dead. HI HO, the merry-o…

Lord have mercy on her soul. She truly does sound evil. Too bad, if she really was Catholic, that she didn’t listen to the Church instead, too bad some people still don’t.
Too many little babies are dead too!!! All those little innocents that need a voice, since they never got one. People deserve to know the truth of what kind of a person she was and what her agenda was since the evil still persists to this day in so called Planned Parenthood. Of course if they had called it Planned Death it probably wouldn’t have caught on as much, but it definately would have been more accurate.
 
Her sins have snowballed, so can one assume that her punishment increases at PP continues it’s genicide?
Not that I’m defending anything she did…but

We can be hopeful that she repented of her sins. Our prayers should be directed at ending the murder, the mothers, the aborted babies, and her since we are to pray for all, even if they are our enemies.

Lord have mercy on all souls involved. If she is being punished, only God knows if the punishment varies over time. Anything we might think would be only a guess.
 
and they shall know them by their deeds…

I sure hope she repented before she died…
 
Margaret Sanger quotes
Founder of Planned Parenthood

Margaret Sanger founder of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, was a proponent of forced eugenics, segregation, abortion, birth control and sexual immorality. Here are some of her quotes.

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.”
Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”
Margaret Sanger’s December 19, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, 255 Adams Street, Milton, Massachusetts. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman Publishers, 1976.

“Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need … We must prevent multiplication of this bad stock.”
Margaret Sanger, April 1933 Birth Control Review.

“Eugenics is … the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.”
Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives.”
[no source available at this time…]

“As an advocate of birth control I wish … to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation…On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”
Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“The campaign for birth control is not merely of eugenic value, but is practically identical with the final aims of eugenics.”
Margaret Sanger. “The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda.” Birth Control Review, October 1921, page 5.

“Our failure to segregate morons who are increasing and multiplying … demonstrates our foolhardy and extravagant sentimentalism … [Philanthropists] encourage the healthier and more normal sections of the world to shoulder the burden of unthinking and indiscriminate fecundity of others; which brings with it, as I think the reader must agree, a dead weight of human waste. Instead of decreasing and aiming to eliminate the stocks that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world, it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant … We are paying for, and even submitting to, the dictates of an ever-increasing, unceasingly spawning class of human beings who never should have been born at all.”
Margaret Sanger. The Pivot of Civilization, 1922. Chapter on “The Cruelty of Charity,” pages 116, 122, and 189. Swarthmore College Library edition.

“The undeniably feeble-minded should, indeed, not only be discouraged but prevented from propagating their kind.”
Margaret Sanger, quoted in Charles Valenza. “Was Margaret Sanger a Racist?”
Family Planning Perspectives, January-February 1985, page 44.

“The third group [of society] are those irresponsible and reckless ones having little regard for the consequences of their acts, or whose religious scruples prevent their exercising control over their numbers. Many of this group are diseased, feeble-minded, and are of the pauper element dependent upon the normal and fit members of society for their support. There is no doubt in the minds of all thinking people that the procreation of this group should be stopped.”
Margaret Sanger. Speech quoted in Birth Control: What It Is, How It Works, What It Will Do. The Proceedings of the First American Birth Control Conference. Held at the Hotel Plaza, New York City, November 11-12, 1921. Published by the Birth Control Review, Gothic Press, pages 172 and 174.

“The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order…”
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children…”
Margaret Sanger (editor). The Woman Rebel, Volume I, Number 1. Reprinted in Woman and the New Race. New York: Brentanos Publishers, 1922.

“Give dysgenic groups [people with ‘bad genes’] in our population their choice of segregation or [compulsory] sterilization.”
Margaret Sanger, April 1932 Birth Control Review.

“As we celebrate the 100th birthday of Margaret Sanger, our outrageous and our courageous leader, we will probably find a number of areas in which we may find more about Margaret Sanger than we thought we wanted to know…”
Faye Wattleton, Past-president of Planned Parenthood

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, proposed the American Baby Code that states, “No woman shall have the legal right to bear a child… without a permit for parenthood”.

Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, proposed the Population Congress with the aim, “…to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.”

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
Hello Chris,
It would appear that Margaret Sanger’s prophecies/beliefs have come to pass havent they?
GraceAngel.
 
If I brought this up on the forum where I usually lose arguments about abortion and birth control, they’ll say that this is irrelevant because it would constitute a logical fallacy through guilt by association.
 
Because pointing out a simple truth certainly betrays one’s position on the issue. :rolleyes:
Hmm, I came to that same conclusion based on the quoted part of “constant Sanger bashing”. While I believe I understand what you’re getting at… yes, others came to the same conclusion that Jaden(name removed by moderator) may possibly be a PP supporter.

Sanger was an evil woman and her evil ways are still being perpetrated today. The ignorance of many people on what they believe Planned Parenthood to be is vast. And it hurts my heart every time I hear someone say “But PP has good resources.”
 
Hmm, I came to that same conclusion based on the quoted part of “constant Sanger bashing”. While I believe I understand what you’re getting at… yes, others came to the same conclusion that Jaden(name removed by moderator) may possibly be a PP supporter.

Sanger was an evil woman and her evil ways are still being perpetrated today. The ignorance of many people on what they believe Planned Parenthood to be is vast. And it hurts my heart every time I hear someone say “But PP has good resources.”
Just do what I do: put all the pro-aborts you come across on your ignore list. Their pro-baby killing agenda isn’t something I care to read about. They revolt me just as much as people who deny the holocaust happened.

I don’t see how I was ‘bashing’ Sanger. All I did was post direct quotes from her. How is that bashing?

Let’s suppose I posted her comments about requiring people to get permission from the government before having children, and used those quotes to prove her agenda wasn’t ‘reproductive freedom’, as PP claims?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top