Someone has made a statement by talking about the “hard” teachings of Jesus. With our natural, God-given instincts for survival, we are oriented towards using those instincts, of supporting ourselves for the present and for the future.
If we go back and think about the “offerings” that are described in the Old Testament, there are many and they serve all kinds of purposes. Some are just to honor God. The idea of the tithe, according to the Jewish commentaries I have read, is that, let’s say, the ENTIRE harvest is God’s – we de-sacralize for our use by offering the tithe of 10%. In other words, we are not entitled to ANY of it, until we follow the law and give the specified amount of the tithe.
Then, there are offerings for sin, and offerings for vows we have made, and all sorts of things like that.
So, when you look at the commands already in the Bible, some people have said that Jesus did not really bring many new obligations or burdens, if you want to look at it that way.
Obviously, no group of Christians that I know of lives that way, by selling all they have and giving it away. No one, or maybe only an obscure few people, live like that.
In the extreme, if all I had was a bowl of food, and I interpreted what Jesus said in the narrowest sense, I’d give the food away and I’d starve to death. Now, that violates several commandments about the sanctity of the body, and squandering resources, and such.
What Jesus said must not be torn apart into sound bites. That is misusing and misinterpreting the Word of God.