P
Phil467
Guest
i understand what the tract is saying and I understand the doctrine…but where is the Scriptural support for it??
If you understand the doctrine, then why did you misrepresent it in your above post? Also, if you’re familiar with the doctrine, then you understand that any Scriptural support it has is implicit, not explicit. It is supported by the Tradition of the Church and by theological reason, much like the doctrine of the Trinity. You can find such support in the “Mary and the Saints” section of Catholic Answers, so I really don’t feel the need to write a long post here.i understand what the tract is saying and I understand the doctrine…but where is the Scriptural support for it??
hey, read post #15, i asked you some questions myself.i understand what the tract is saying and I understand the doctrine…but where is the Scriptural support for it??
Actually it is not. There is only one mediator, according to scripture, between God and man, and that is Christ.Have you ever asked anyone to pray for you? Isn’t this using a HUMAN as a mediator between you and God? Understand that the there are only two differences between asking Mary to pray for you rather than having your Uncle Charles pray for you 1) Mary is closer to God (she is His mother, free from sin, experiencing the beatific vision), and 2) is outside of time, meaning that she can make a LOT more prayers than any friend you have on earth.
you are familiar with the wedding feast at Cana…i understand what the tract is saying and I understand the doctrine…but where is the Scriptural support for it??
Asking Mary to pray for us is intercessory prayer also.Actually it is not. There is only one mediator, according to scripture, between God and man, and that is Christ.
Asking someone to pray is considered intercessory prayer, which is commanded in the scripture; believers are to pray for one another.
When the disciples asked Jesus to show them how to pray, He said, in this way: Our Father…
As we are told to imitate Christ, I think we do well to pray for to the Father and to Him only.
Dead people are not mediators, they are dead; communication with the dead is forbidden in the O.T., and God has not relaxed that restriction.
and when a Catholic ‘prays’ to Mary, that’s all we are doing,Asking a human to pray for me is using that human as another “mediator” between me and Christ…According to Paul Christ is still the mediator between that other person and God, I don’t ask that person to pray to Mary…also, if Mary was without sin, then why did she need a saviour??
Let the Dead be Dead.Actually it is not. There is only one mediator, according to scripture, between God and man, and that is Christ.
Asking someone to pray is considered intercessory prayer, which is commanded in the scripture; believers are to pray for one another.
When the disciples asked Jesus to show them how to pray, He said, in this way: Our Father…
As we are told to imitate Christ, I think we do well to pray for to the Father and to Him only.
Dead people are not mediators, they are dead; communication with the dead is forbidden in the O.T., and God has not relaxed that restriction.
Glad you pointed this out. Also, there’s a pretty big difference between holding a seance and asking a saint to pray for/with you.Asking Mary to pray for us is intercessory prayer also.
But more importantly, I am sorry that you think those who have died believing in Christ are dead!
My God is the God of the living. Those who die in Christ are not dead in Him, but Alive in Him.
There is much Scripture that talks of those who die in Him do not really die, but are alive in Him. I am surprised that as a christian you were not aware that if we die believing in Him, we have eternal life, not eternal death.
I’ll look for that Scripture for you though. You should not as a Christian continue to think that those who die believing in Him are dead, but rather Alive in Him.
God Bless,
Maria
When did that resurrection occur?They have been resurrected by the power of God’s grace.
Perhaps resurrection was the wrong term to use. Their bodily death was but a release of their very-much-alive spirit into Heaven (or Purgatory, but we don’t ask for intercession from souls in Purgatory). They have not been bodily resurrected, but I don’t believe their spirit is in any way dead. Their bodies sleep, but their spirits are very much alive. Unlike the concept of death in the Old Testament, they are not in Sheol, the realm of the dead. It is forbidden to speak with spirits in the realm of the dead. They are in Heaven, which is by nature the realm of the living.When did that resurrection occur?
Thank you! I knew I’d heard a support like this back when I posed the question here a few months ago.Kristina P
I think the verse you are searching for is Mark 12:26-27 which says, "‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’?* He is not God of the dead, but of the living;*** you are quite wrong." The abode of the dead is hell, while heaven is the abode of the living.
It is also worthwhile to note that, at the transfiguration of Jesus, Peter, James and John witnessed Jesus speaking to Moses and Elijah. These are two members of the heavenly assembly that can rightly be described as “the souls of just men made perfect.” These two prophets were very much alive in heaven and were even visible to the apostles who could hear them speaking with Jesus. Naturally, all of this was granted to them by the grace of God, and it speaks volumes to the meaning of the communion of saints.
The OT passage that you are referring to is Deuteronomy 18:9-12 which reads as follows:…
…
Dead people are not mediators, they are dead; communication with the dead is forbidden in the O.T., and God has not relaxed that restriction.
According to the online 1917 Catholic Encyclopedia article on Purgatory, Section IV (Invocation of Souls):we don’t ask for intercession from souls in Purgatory
Matthew 27: ( KJV )When did that resurrection occur?
Pax, as always, your posts are thoughtful, as well as well-thought.Scripture often refers to “co-workers” with Jesus.