While I agree that stephe1987’s reasons are, well, not very compelling (having lived with SSA for many, many years), I don’t necessarily agree with all of your “facts” either.
The reasons for SSA are indeed unknown, and in my own case, far more complicated than even I can sort out.
As humans we love our categories – those tidy little boxes into which we can compartmentalize people’s characteristics and actions. If we are to help each other in this life, we have to take each other as the infinitely complex creation each of us is. There is no simple answer: this is what causes your difficulty in this or that area of your life; therefore, I have the simple solution. Puh-lease. If only it were that easy!
What is known is that for the vast majority of homosexual persons, whatever its cause may be, their orientation is as unchangeable as the colour of their eyes.
This “fact” always bothers me. Most of us “former practicing homosexuals” live in the closet, as it were, with regards to our pasts. I have never participated in a study, answered a questionairre, or even openly discussed my past even with my friends. Only one person at my school knows about my past SSA (and that I acted on it for over ten years), even though I am very close with some of my colleagues. No one at my parish knows about it.
So how can we say that even for
most people that orientation is unchangeable? Nobody who creates these “facts” knows anything about me, or the fact that I was once the champion of their argument… but that I now have absolutely no SSA whatsoever. In other words, those of us who have changed may be, perhaps, mostly unaccounted. There’s not a registry for “current orientation” that I know of
The Church accepts, as you may wish to look at in the Catechism, that a person’s sexual orientation is an innate part of themselves and that it is morally neutral in and of itself: it is a person’s acts - be they with the same or opposite gender - which carry a moral dimension. Such counselling that a homosexual person should need would be the same as a heterosexual: i.e. being aware of what constitutes sinful behaviour and how anyone, gay or straight, should be committed to a life of chastity if they’re not married and open to the idea of the procreative act.
Very wisely and kindly put. And here I agree with Stephe – SSA is most definitely a cross to carry.
MEANWHILE, back to the OP – words fail me! I would be on the phone with every parent of every Catholic school student, starting a campaign to storm the Bishop’s office with letters, calls, and prayers until a new board was put in place. Good heavens!
It’s always time to pray for one another, especially those in authority
Gert