C
ctos
Guest
Indeed, amicably!Using metaphysical terms and philosophies in regards to the Holy Mystery seems antithetical to me. Christianity did fine for 11 centuries before coining transubstantiation. When rationalism became all the rage, the Church felt like it should follow suit.
It’s the Body and Blood of Christ. Period. Why say more?
O+
Ah: Now you make most interesting point O. Most interesting indeed! You see, the Church cannot ignore what comes along. The Church sanctifies, and baptizes. It isn’t that the Church ‘felt it should follow suit’, rather, the Church showed how the faith is rational. Why say more? Because faith seeks understanding. People always want to have a deeper understanding. And for all the theological study of transubstantiation, of the Holy Eucharist, it remains a mysterium fidei, which we say at Mass. We don’t claim it’s not a mystery.