Any ideas on how to respond to someone who feels my fiance and I should not be attending an NFP class as part of our marriage preparation?
Well, I’d just ignore her and go about my business.
But, if you want actual responses:
(1) The Church herself recommends it. What makes mom think she knows better than the Church? In fact, in a number of dioceses it is
required as part of marriage preparation. Your mom should study up on what the Church calls “proximate preparation for marriage” and sex information
is a part of that preparation.
(2) NFP needs to be studied without intercourse, a woman cannot learn her cycle as effectively if there is seminal fluid present.
Her argument is that we “shouldn’t need to know about things like that yet”…and that it will be too uncomfortable for us to learn as an unmarried couple.
The Church disagrees-- again proximate preparation for marriage includes sexual topics.
I might also add that she didn’t feel I needed to know the “facts of life” until I was 20…
Well, the best response I can give to this is Canon Law:
Can. 1096 ß1 For matrimonial consent to exist, it is necessary that the contracting parties be at least not ignorant of the fact that marriage is a permanent partnership between a man and a woman, ordered to the procreation of children through some form of sexual cooperation.
ß2 This ignorance is not presumed after puberty.
How would you respond to someone like this?
I’d ignore her completely. And, don’t discuss your business with your mother from here on out.