Predestination and free-will

  • Thread starter Thread starter And1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I, for instance, was a devout Calvinist in another life. I went to a seminary where election and predestination were cryptic requirements for graduation.

Free will and predestination are, as Freddy correctly stated, diametrically opposed.
I agree Calvinist double predestination is opposed to free will, but do you know what the Catholic understanding of predestination is? What is free will in your view?
 
God is not pulling the strings forcing us to act in one way or another. We are making decisions. I don’t think anyone could argue otherwise. But making a decision does not equate to free will if it is the only decision we could make . And it is. If God is omniscient then He knows how I will finish this post. I don’t yet. I haven’t decided. But there is only one way it can be completed .

If that’s your idea of free will then we disagree on the very definition.
What is your definition of free will? You’re assuming determinism is true when most Catholics (Thomists especially) don’t even consider it. Can you prove determinism?

I know you need to eat in order to survive, but does me knowing this fact force you to eat only at 8pm tonight? Determinism is secondary here.
 
40.png
Freddy:
God is not pulling the strings forcing us to act in one way or another. We are making decisions. I don’t think anyone could argue otherwise. But making a decision does not equate to free will if it is the only decision we could make . And it is. If God is omniscient then He knows how I will finish this post. I don’t yet. I haven’t decided. But there is only one way it can be completed .

If that’s your idea of free will then we disagree on the very definition.
What is your definition of free will? You’re assuming determinism is true when most Catholics (Thomists especially) don’t even consider it. Can you prove determinism?

I know you need to eat in order to survive, but does me knowing this fact force you to eat only at 8pm tonight? Determinism is secondary here.
It’s unfortunate that there are two threads running on the same subject. I answered this in the other one.
 
I thought that for the Church it is rather clear that mankind was given free will to make their own choices for good or evil. Plus they can repent of their bad choices by means of the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Now, if there are other details to be filled in regarding what G-d may know in advance, that’s fine for (religious) philosophers to discuss and debate; but for Catholics who live in the real world of their religion, all they need know is that they have the power to make their own decisions with the grace of G-d of course.
 
I thought that for the Church it is rather clear that mankind was given free will to make their own choices for good or evil. Plus they can repent of their bad choices by means of the Sacrament of Reconciliation. Now, if there are other details to be filled in regarding what G-d may know in advance, that’s fine for (religious) philosophers to discuss and debate; but for Catholics who live in the real world of their religion, all they need know is that they have the power to make their own decisions with the grace of G-d of course.
I keep saying this, but the ability to make a choice is not necessarily a proof of free will. Free will would dictate that you could make different choices under exactly the same conditions.

If that is the case then under the same conditions nothing has happened to cause a change in the decision so whatever is chosen would always be chosen. Almost by definition.
 
Predestination relates to free will in the sense that a human chooses which of the final destinations we could reach: Heaven or hell.
 
OP, try to put this issue in perspective. From God’s point of view, because He is all-knowing, yes predestination applies. The Lord knows his own. From our human point of view, though, we act out of free will, we do not know where we will end up until we reach the afterlife.
 
The ability to determine your own destiny.

On double predestination, the majority of Calvinists eschew it too. Gods sovereignty and our moral agency are simultaneous.

Duality is how they handle the contradiction.
 
The ability to determine your own destiny.
I think a good definition of free will (aside from the CCC) is: the ability to choose according to wisdom and to love what is truly good. Catholics don’t believe we can choose our own destiny, we are principally ordered towards the greatest good (i.e. God). God inclines us to the good, but we are not bound to choose one particular thing because we can see it as good and evil in various ways.

For example: I can choose to drive or fly from Chicago to New York, but I am not bound only to drive. It might be a good for me to fly to get there faster, but I might not have the money to fly, so I might not choose it (which would be a form of “evil” or absence of good in a loose sense). I can plan a road trip which might be a greater good instead of flying, and so forth.

The main idea is we only choose good in some form as we don’t choose things that would be bad for us, this is how we desire things. What is the greatest good for me in this situation that can best lead me to God?
 
Last edited:
I recently learned that the Catholic Church believes in predestination. I found this on Wikipedia: “This means that while it is held that those whom God has elected to eternal life will infallibly attain it, and are therefore said to be predestined to salvation by God, those who perish are not predestined to damnation.”
Rather than Wikipedia, use the list of Catholic Dogmas found here: http://www.traditionalcatholicpriest.com/2015/09/19/a-list-of-the-dogmas-of-the-catholic-church/
In particular Dogmas #96, 120 & 121
Does this mean that everyone that goes to heaven was predestined for it or that some were predestined and some were not.
Only some.
Also, how can free will fit into predestination?
Prior to physically creating, God is able to observe man’s free-willed choices.

Thank you and thanks be to God!
 
I think a good definition of free will (aside from the CCC) is: the ability to choose according to wisdom and to love what is truly good.
Then, as is typically the case, we diverge at the semantic level. 🙂
 
This sounds exactly like something Morpheus would say. Especially the post part. I like it.

#taketheredpillNeo
 
I think a good definition of free will (aside from the CCC) is: the ability to choose according to wisdom and to love what is truly good. Catholics don’t believe we can choose our own destiny, we are principally ordered towards the greatest good (i.e. God). God inclines us to the good, but we are not bound to choose one particular thing because we can see it as good and evil in various ways.
And without God, where are we inclined towards?
 
The ability to determine your own destiny.

On double predestination, the majority of Calvinists eschew it too. Gods sovereignty and our moral agency are simultaneous.

Duality is how they handle the contradiction.
Sounds like cognitive dissonance to me.
 
40.png
Hume:
The ability to determine your own destiny.

On double predestination, the majority of Calvinists eschew it too. Gods sovereignty and our moral agency are simultaneous.

Duality is how they handle the contradiction.
Sounds like cognitive dissonance to me.
Fundamentally why I left religion. Got tired of telling myself things that felt like lies in order to keep it all in the air.

I still go to church since I promised my wife I would - I still believed when we married. But it’s just a time to socialize and quietly catch up on events with my phone.
 
Last edited:
40.png
Freddy:
40.png
Hume:
The ability to determine your own destiny.

On double predestination, the majority of Calvinists eschew it too. Gods sovereignty and our moral agency are simultaneous.

Duality is how they handle the contradiction.
Sounds like cognitive dissonance to me.
Fundamentally why I left religion. Got tired of telling myself things that felt like lies in order to keep it all in the air.

I still go to church since I promised my wife I would - I still believed when we married. But it’s just a time to socialize and quietly catch up on events with my phone.
I did go back to my old church a few years ago when I was in the UK. Took my daughter to show her where her old man spent so much time as a kid. Head choirboy doncha know!

The sevice had just finished so I asked if I could have a look around. Nothing had changed. All exactly as I remembered it. And then someone came up and said ‘Hey, aren’t you Betty and Ray’s boy?’ Ye gods, it had been forty years at least since I’d been there and three or four people recognised me. Talked about the old times and then someone brought out the chalice that they still used that my late mother had donated to the church in memory of my father.

Very emotional moment. Must have got something in my eye I think…
 
Last edited:
Then, as is typically the case, we diverge at the semantic level. 🙂
As any good argument should be. As this is a Catholic forum that’s the standard understanding of Catholic predestination. What do you have difficulty with?
 
And without God, where are we inclined towards?
Do you mean as an atheist without God or God not existing? An atheist would still be inclined towards the good because that’s the only way we desire anything (“how can this choice benefit me?”).

Without God existing, existence wouldn’t exist 😉.
 
Last edited:
An atheist would still be inclined towards the good because that’s the only way we desire anything (“how can this choice benefit me?”).
I respectfully disagree. I think without God, our natural inclination is not good. From Romans 3:

“ 9 What shall we conclude then? Do we have any advantage? Not at all! For we have already made the charge that Jews and Gentiles alike are all under the power of sin. 10 As it is written:

There is no one righteous, not even one;
11 there is no one who understands;
there is no one who seeks God.
12 All have turned away,
they have together become worthless;
there is no one who does good,
not even one.”

Without God in our lives our natural inclination is - as St. Paul rightly says - not good. We might have free will - but it does us no good - at least as far as God’s concerned.
 
Without God in our lives our natural inclination is - as St. Paul rightly says - not good. We might have free will - but it does us no good - at least as far as God’s concerned.
In this sense without God we prefer lesser goods which are referred to as sin. We choose what we perceive as good, even if it is not truly good (to lead us to heaven). Without God, we desire evil but no one can desire evil in of itself.

In order to desire anything it needs to have some degree of goodness in it, otherwise we wouldn’t choose it. The finite goods in the world contain both good (from God) and evil, thus we aren’t bound to choose one way. We can always find benefits and faults in our choices.

For example, a very bad man might contemplate murder, but typically in order to benefit from it. His twisted mind might want an inheritance, perceived by him as a “good”, but without God he cannot choose what is truly good to get him to heaven.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top