C
Christian_Unity
Guest
Predesination, free will, Augustine Pelagian controversy, Catholic views, Calvinism… let’s discuss in a Christ like manner as siblings in Christ. 
Likewise the Spirit helps us in our weakness. For we do not know what to pray for as we ought, but the Spirit himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words. And he who searches hearts knows what is the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for the saints according to the will of God. And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.Predesination, free will, Augustine Pelagian controversy, Catholic views, Calvinism… let’s discuss in a Christ like manner as siblings in Christ.![]()
I believe our will is free to choose what it desires. My view of predestination would be classical Reformed. Let me find a few links for you from my position.I’d love to, need to set some rules then, are you arguing against free will in this? or rather that we have no say in the decision of our acceptance of the Word of God, and second being that there is much controversy over the use of the word, what is your definition of predestination
Yes, I do hold to double predestination. I would respond by saying if God willed that all men to be saved, then all men would be saved. Who can oppose the sovereign will of God? The doctrine of election is found throughout the Scriptures. Can you please read Romans chapter 9 and get back to me on that one. Also, please read Romans 10 and 11 too, since there seems to be elect Israelites and those whom God hardened for the sake of us Gentile believers.Pardon me for not having read the links you have posted yet, I am running on supposition biased on conversations I have had with baptist seminarian who holds to reformed theology.
[BIBLEDRB]1 Timothy 2:4[/BIBLEDRB]
My first supposition is that you hold to double predestination, How then can God will that all men be saved, while in practice choosing some for heaven and some for hell.
No one can oppose it, CU. 'Tis true, this.Yes, I do hold to double predestination. I would respond by saying if God willed that all men to be saved, then all men would be saved. Who can oppose the sovereign will of God?
Remember, I qualifed the word will with the sovereign will of God. We come from different theological circles; therefore, we should clarify what we mean for better discussion. Do you believe God has the power and ability to save everyone? If so, why do some perish without Christ?No one can oppose it, CU. 'Tis true, this.
But God’s will allows for what Blaise Pascal calls the “dignity of causality”.
God’s antecedent will always is fulfilled. But God’s consequent will has its origin in our choices. We are given the dignity of actually causing events. Such as our salvation. Or our destruction.
You are misappropriating the term “God’s will”–sometimes you mean God’s antecedent will, and other times you mean God’s consequent will.
Best to clarify which one you mean when in discussions such as this.
Indeed.Remember, I qualifed the word will with the sovereign will of God. We come from different theological circles; therefore, we should clarify what we mean for better discussion.
Absolute, 100% yes!Do you believe God has the power and ability to save everyone?
Because God is a gentleman and will not force himself upon those who find him odious.If so, why do some perish without Christ?
Amen!This is good, and it is pleasing in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all people to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, - 1 Timothy 2:3-5
That is the classical Protestant Arminian response that has no biblical support or basis. The argument that we are not puppets has no biblical basis either. God always does what He pleases for His own glory, independent from man. He is our sovereign God and His sovereign will always comes to pass.Indeed.
Because God is a gentleman and will not force himself upon those who find him odious.
Amen!
Have you forgotten that you are on a Catholic forum in dialogue with (mostly) Catholics?That is the classical Protestant Arminian response that has no biblical support or basis.
This is a peculiar proposal.The argument that we are not puppets has no biblical basis either.
Amen!God always does what He pleases for His own glory, independent from man. He is our sovereign God and His sovereign will always comes to pass.
Before we continue, I want to first clarify if you are debating these issue according to official Catholic dogma and doctrine on such matters. If not, then for the record, we should clarify that your view is not offical Catholic doctrine. I do think you should get familar with Augustine and the Pelagian controversy first. Augustine is quite the Catholic Saint who is also embraced by Protestants, especially Calvinists.Pardon me for not having read the links you have posted yet, I am running on supposition biased on conversations I have had with baptist seminarian who holds to reformed theology.
[BIBLEDRB]1 Timothy 2:4[/BIBLEDRB]
My first supposition is that you hold to double predestination, How then can God will that all men be saved, while in practice choosing some for heaven and some for hell.
LOL… thanks for the reminder. We are on the non-catholic forum site. I thought Scripture falls under that category of Sacred written tradition?Have you forgotten that you are on a Catholic forum in dialogue with (mostly) Catholics?
We do not propose that our beliefs must be found in Scripture. Rather, our beliefs come from Christ, who provided revelation through 2 channels, Sacred Tradition as well as Sacred Scripture.
Amen!
The biblical basis is that we were created as rational, free beings who make our own choices, therefore we are not puppets or robots. We were created to love and love cannot exist unless it is freely chosen. Freedom, by its very nature, must allow the alternative choice to love, that being evil.That is the classical Protestant Arminian response that has no biblical support or basis. The argument that we are not puppets has no biblical basis either.
Yes, and what pleased God was to create rational, free beings so that they might love, knowing fully well that they may not love. He came to save those of us who have failed in loving, thereby accomplishing his will for us.God always does what He pleases for His own glory, independent from man. He is our sovereign God and His sovereign will always comes to pass.
LOL… thanks for the reminder.
That is indeed one way to look at Sacred Scripture.We are on the non-catholic forum site. I thought Scripture falls under that category of Sacred written tradition?
Radyj,St Augustine is embraced by Calvinists, mostly because during the 1500’s if you did not refer your teaching to one of the church fathers you were not given the time of day, however John Calvin was extremely selective on the teachings of St Augustine which he espoused, just like he is extremely selective with what scripture he quotes.
[BIBLEDRB]1 John 4:1[/BIBLEDRB]