Pregnant muslimah murdered by racist

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZAKI
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
What an evil person he is. :imsorry:
He is either possessed or a psycho. Bet his been in trouble with the law probably all his life. Anybody that murders people for nothing are evil people. No one is safe in this world anymore, not even babies in the womb.
Shockingly sad………… 😦
 
What an evil person he is. :imsorry:
He is either possessed or a psycho. Bet his been in trouble with the law probably all his life. Anybody that murders people for nothing are evil people. No one is safe in this world anymore, not even babies in the womb.
Shockingly sad………… 😦
I don’t think he was a psychopath. That detracts responsibility. This man was a nasty piece of work.
 
Actually, it is not.

It is highly prejudiced but it is not racist. Muslims aren’t a race, they are a religion that includes people from many ethnic backgrounds.
yeah i know-i keep making that error…
but still it isn’t right!

wasalam
 
Mahometans in Nigeria killed 20 Christians and burned three churches.

Isn’t this racist?

jihadwatch.org/archives/027254.php#respond

In my parish, a man’s uncle was killed by three Mahometans in Lebanon because he would not renounce Christ and join their demonic faith.

Isn’t this racist?
 
The murder of the pregnant woman resulted in two deaths. This was evil. He deserves punishment on both counts. And for the “accidental” assault" on the husband as well.
I see he is racist. I don’t see he is Catholic or even a Christian. Racism is wrong.
Honor killing is also wrong. And family that kills a daughter (or son or mom, or aunt, uncle, etc) because they feel their honor was besmirched has done evil as well. They also deserve punishment for that murder.
:(Zaki, what did you think? That as Catholics we would celebrate the death of a woman and her child? Not likely.:nope:
As Catholics, shouldn’t we pray for her and the child in hope of mercy?

God Bless.

Chris.
 
Oh so you DID post this up. A very stupid and immature post…I was definitely not expecting it from you.

wasalam
Not stupid or immature, though your response is a bit immature. Let’s remember one thing:
40.png
GOD:
Thou shalt not Murder
The “honor” killing and the case in Germany are both murder.

The reason I have the word honor in quotes is that clearly anyone who would kill their system is completely without honor.

Murder is wrong, always. If a Muhammadan kills a Christian or a Jew or an animist for not following Mahomet then it is Murder. The Muhammadan goes to hell for that unless he confesses.

btw Muhammadan is a more correct term. IIRC Muslim is Arabic for submission or one who submits. Since Mahomet wanted to be a Jewish prophet and then failed and dreamed up his own god there is nothing truly to submit to and so the person is a follower of Mahomet but not of any real deity.
 
When I saw this story in the newspaper yesterday, it broke my heart. The person who committed this crime appears to be a psychopath and deserves to be put to death. He is too dangerous to be kept alive. Unfortunately because this happened in Germany I think this is an unlikely outcome.
 
Hang on here. The OP is talking about a racist attack. There is NO justification for anyone to attack anyone else due to their race, colour or creed. Full stop. Period. So called honour killings tend to be culturally based. Some people use Jesus, God, Allah or The Prophet as an excuse to do really bad things. The mistake is to take their slant on the Bible or Q’oran as gospel (bad pun I know)

Pat
 
When I saw this story in the newspaper yesterday, it broke my heart. The person who committed this crime appears to be a psychopath and deserves to be put to death. He is too dangerous to be kept alive. Unfortunately because this happened in Germany I think this is an unlikely outcome.
sanctity of life?
 
When I saw this story in the newspaper yesterday, it broke my heart. The person who committed this crime appears to be a psychopath and deserves to be put to death. He is too dangerous to be kept alive. Unfortunately because this happened in Germany I think this is an unlikely outcome.
That “psychopath” needs treatment.
 
so all muslims are like osama bin laden? trying to make that connection IS racist

wasalam
But that isn’t what I said. I said I do not trust bin Laden am I a racist? I suppose I would be because I really don’t care for them at all.
 
Let’s deal with the reality of words here.

The word “racist” deals with the race of a person. Hating a person, even killing them, based on their religious beliefs is not racism. It’s prejudice, yes. It’s wrong, yes. All sins are equal. But let’s not say they’re racist. You might as well say it’s sexism.
 
sanctity of life?
You have to weigh the dangers that such a demented person will do this again. The sanctity of life also means that the civil authorities have a responsibility to protect the population they govern from homicidal maniacs. I think your best bet is to argue that if he is locked up and the key thrown away we can be reasonably sure he will not be in a position to take anyone’s life again, modern prisons being what they are. (To which I would probably respond: what if he’s given parole at some later date for good behavior?)
 
You have to weigh the dangers that such a demented person will do this again. The sanctity of life also means that the civil authorities have a responsibility to protect the population they govern from homicidal maniacs. I think your best bet is to argue that if he is locked up and the key thrown away we can be reasonably sure he will not be in a position to take anyone’s life again, modern prisons being what they are. (To which I would probably respond: what if he’s given parole at some later date for good behavior?)
Sorry, I do not subscribe to the “Lock up and throw the key away” system of justice. Here in Scotland (and also in Germany, I believe) the element of retribution in a sentence is not given the same weighting as in the US. As for parole - It is dependant on a lot more than “good behaviour”. Various professionals will decide if there is any risk of that person re-offending. Release would be through license. Any breach of the license conditions would normally mean immediate re-incarceration. You may not agree with this type of system but there are fundamental differences to our justice sytems. Unfortunately, because we all tend to believe “our” system is better we are at a disatvantage when arguing about these issues,
Must go to work. God Bless

Pat
 
Sorry, I do not subscribe to the “Lock up and throw the key away” system of justice. Here in Scotland (and also in Germany, I believe) the element of retribution in a sentence is not given the same weighting as in the US. As for parole - It is dependant on a lot more than “good behaviour”. Various professionals will decide if there is any risk of that person re-offending. Release would be through license. Any breach of the license conditions would normally mean immediate re-incarceration. You may not agree with this type of system but there are fundamental differences to our justice sytems. Unfortunately, because we all tend to believe “our” system is better we are at a disatvantage when arguing about these issues,
Must go to work. God Bless

Pat
I don’t know anything about your justice system, but you haven’t described anything that is unfamiliar to the way things are done here. There is no “retributive element” that I’m aware of. Justice is distinct from revenge, nomatter what side of the Atlantic one lives on.

My point is entirely different, which is that someone who stabs a pregnant woman is so dangerous that he cannot be allowed to be in society. Whether he gets life imprisonment without parole or is executed is not important as long as that end is met; however, since many murderers do end up getting paroled after years have passed and memories of their crimes have faded, I favor execution.
 
No i do not approve of it-what do you mean? you did call me a Mahomet! The term is MUSLIM! Also the Paulicians are used in two meaning one which you described and the other which some muslims call christians bcz they believe them to actually be followers of Paul rather than Jesus (pbuh)

wasalam
No, he did not. He called you a Mahomettan which is another spelling of Muhammedan, which is the correct term.
 
In any event, it is an archaism: no one says “Mohammadan” anymore (unless that person is an actor doing a one-man-show Hilaire Beloc impersonation).
 
And to you really think it matters WHAT you call a demon inspired false religion invented by a pedophile?

God bless the Crusaders!
 
And you can safely rely on that Mohammadan to scream “Aeeeiiii!” as the Hulk throws him off a parapet or something – I’m with you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top