TheGarg:
WWJD???
Christ would tell you to attend to the other person first. He is kinda big on those selfless acts of sacrificing Himself for the Good of Mankind
“What would Jesus do?” is a very good question indeed, given the following passage from the Gospel of John, chapter 12:
3 Mary took a liter of costly perfumed oil made from genuine aromatic nard and anointed the feet of Jesus and dried them with her hair; the house was filled with the fragrance of the oil.
4 Then Judas the Iscariot, one (of) his disciples, and the one who would betray him, said,
5 “Why was this oil not sold for three hundred days’ wages and given to the poor?”
7 So Jesus said, "Leave her alone. Let her keep this for the day of my burial.
8 You always have the poor with you, but you do not always have me."
I don’t mean to swat at the bee-hive here, but maybe there is some credence to what UKcatholicguy is saying?
From what I’ve been able to make of the argument, it seems as though no one is worried about the host because God would take of it, but we
need to attend to the priest because men are more important than the “piece of bread.” But would not God care about that which is
most important? To say that we need not worry about the host because God would protect it is to say that God
would not care about the priest and let him suffer unless we did something about it because God
wouldn’t protect
him. If the human person was worth more that the Eucharist, would God not do
more to protect the priest than the pieces of the host?
So, what would God do?
btw, I don’t really have an answer to this question, just trying to further the discussion a bit from what would otherwise be an obvious answer.