T
TuckerM
Guest
Is it proper for the priest celebrating Mass to also be the organist for the Mass?
Could you explain? I’m honestly just confused…Additionally, how is he doing this? Short of bilocation… At the Processional he should be walking in, at the Gospel reading the Good Book, at the Offertory setting the Altar, at the Hymn at Communion distributing Communion, etc. etc.
No, it is not. The mass is not a performance by the priest. Personally, I would be very scandalized by this.Is it proper for the priest celebrating Mass to also be the organist for the Mass?
Honestly, the need for music at Mass is not so great that we need the priest to be the organist and celebrant. Regardless of the location, this is simply wrong.I saw it a Newman Center at college once. The mass toke place in a house that had a room set aside for the church. Sometimes there was someone to play the piano and sometimes there wasn’t. If there wasn’t the priest would play an during the songs. Didn’t bother anyone and Lord knows we didn’t know how to play so I was grateful.
This is even worse. if the priest isn’t part of the procession, then there is no need for a procession. I’m truly being scandalized by this thread… this priest (whether he realizes it or not) is placing more importance on the music vs the actual liturgy of the mass.He doesn’t process in or out. He plays and the altar servers process in with no one behind them but the lector. He only plays the processional and recessional hymns. I always thought the celebrant was the celebrant and the organist was the organist and they weren’t the same person. And he does this even when there are musicians who could play. He just does it because he likes to.
wow… he’s not really supposed to leave the sanctuary once Mass starts (with a few exceptions - baptism, sprinkling holy water on the people, etc). I’ve never seen a parish with an organ in the sanctuary.He leaves the altar and goes to the side of the church where the organ is located.