The first thing, I think, that anyone reading the OP’s post has to admit is that she really
is trying hard – moreso than most would, I’d bet. Talk about going “above and beyond”, as compared to most!
That being said, one must ask the question: did TryingHard
ask a question (that had the possibility of two distinct answers) or was she simply giving lip service to a formality, with the expectation that there was really only one possible answer to be had? Given the OP’s reaction to the priest’s reply, it seems like it was more the latter than the former.
But, a dispensation is at the discretion of the pastor; it’s not something to which a person is entitled. If the OP was asking the question in good faith, then the fact of not getting the answer she expected might have been frustrating/annoying/disappointing… but wasn’t a failure on the part of the confessor.
twf:
That being said, I was under the impression that only one’s canonical pastor (the pastor of one’s geographical parish) could grant such a dispensation…not just whichever priest happens to be in the confessional.
This is correct. The ability to grant a dispensation from the obligation to assist at Mass falls to the pastor only.
Given the way that TryingHard relates the story – that the priest said “I cannot give you a dispensation”, and not “I won’t give you a dispensation” – it’s possible that the priest wasn’t the pastor there, and he was simply acting properly, rather than unpastorally. The priest was hearing confessions
between Masses and
on a Sunday. Maybe we might give the guy the benefit of the doubt…
I never thought in a million years he would tell me I had to go regardless of having friends from out of town over that was planned in advance. I felt as if he was distracted or not really listening to my situation.
No – although you
really were making an effort, you essentially told him that you were
able but
not inclined to fulfill your obligation. “I’ve got other plans that I prioritize above you” typically doesn’t get a favorable reaction from
anyone, don’t you think?
TryingHard17:
Having chest pains? What is more important, your cardiologist or Jesus? Car doesn’t work and church is a 5 mile walk and you have to take a $20 can ride to church? What is more important? Money or Jesus?
The Church asks us to fulfill our obligation if we are able, but not to put ourselves at risk of harm. Chest pains? Go to the hospital. Car problems that make it impossible to get to Mass? Obligation goes away. Inconvenienced? Obligation remains.
I mean, we have to live our lives. We put in a good faith effort to fulfill our obligations, but sometimes it is very difficult to the point of causing significant inconvenience to others or to the point of simply being impractical
Somehow, I imagine that this was within the realm of possible reactions that Jesus might have expressed following the Last Supper – “Father, I’m trying to fulfill my obligation to you, but it’s pretty difficult, and definitely inconvenient.” Sure glad he didn’t…
That is where the merciful priest comes in and says “You tried to bring your family to mass, but you made a mistake. Read today’s mass readings, say some prayers and enjoy your dinner catching up with good friends.”
This is where a merciful priest
has the opportunity, but not the requirement to release the obligation. You’re a mom – you know that some times, the right response is to hold your children to their responsibilities, even if all they did was ‘make an honest mistake’. In fact, it was a really good lesson (if a frustrating experience!) for your husband, who – as you told us – just wanted to bail. In the end, ya’ll did the right thing, even though it was inconvenient. Your 5-year-old and 3-year-old probably won’t remember this experience, but it’s
exactly the kind of lesson about living up to one’s obligations that I’m sure you’re trying to teach them…
I try to imagine Pope Francis Or even Jesus telling me the same thing this priest did, and I honestly can’t!
Are you certain? True, Jesus’ response to people who were trying but making mistakes
was “I do not condemn you”, but it
wasn’t “don’t sweat it” – it was “go and sin no more”…
