N
Nacho45
Guest
I would be very interested in the answer as well.Quoted again, still waiting for an answer.
I would be very interested in the answer as well.Quoted again, still waiting for an answer.
With this line of thinking, ought we not to redesign St. Peter’s tomb in the Vatican as to no longer bear the inverted cross upon which he died?Obviously the priest should have been more careful if he didn’t intend to support gay sex, since it no doubt disturbs others besides yourself when they see it–the rainbow insignia having become the flag of support for support for homosexual activity.
.
Hawaii is part of the United States, but it is located in a part of the world where most of the surrounding dioceses belong to the Conference of Bishops of the South Pacific (CEPAC).I would be very interested in the answer as well.
No, USCCB would have competence in Hawaii, not CEPAC. Also, the OP is in California, not Hawaii.Hawaii is part of the United States, but it is located in a part of the world where most of the surrounding dioceses belong to the Conference of Bishops of the South Pacific (CEPAC).
Since they have indults for different Holy Days of Obligation, I would recommend looking at Google for CEPAC guidelines in this matter.
Not on a stole, it isn’t. Symbolism aside, whether it’s a reference to Noah or the gay movement, stoles aren’t supposed to be a mismash of colours. They are to be of the colour of the day.Please don’t jump to conclusions; since he was not from your diocese, maybe no one told him that the red stole was the uniform of the day. The rainbow is a universal symbol of redemption; a promise made to all of humankind.
Because there is still that illicit practice of some priests wearing stoles outside their (usually white) chasubles.No, USCCB would have competence in Hawaii, not CEPAC. Also, the OP is in California, not Hawaii.
My next question would be why the OP could see the priest’s stole at all, when a chasuble is required.