G
guanophore
Guest
One of the reasons it has been discouraged is just because of people like this, who don’t know the difference between a sacramental blessing and an everyday blessing. Liturgy is not the time for everyday activity, but should center around what the ordained ministers are providing for the people.Anyone can give a blessing. I might say to you, “God bless you” (especially if you sneeze). That’s a blessing.
Priests (and deacons) are able to confer types of blessings that laypeople cannot. An example would be when a Rosary is blessed (and it thus becomes a sacramental). An exorcism (also a sacramental) is another example. These types of blessings are supposed to follow a prescribed form (there’s a Book of Blessings that all priests have). It is improper for a priest to make up such a blessing “on the fly” (though it happens).
So the question is, is a blessing at Communion the first type or the second type. Because there is no prescribed form or rite, I believe the Communion blessing is a general blessing which does not require Holy Orders to administer.
But it is also completely unnecessary. Anyone is perfectly free to remain in the pew (and nobody will think that’s strange - it happens all the time, and there are lots of reasons why people might do this). The only real benefit that I can see for this “blessing” is that it makes it easier to get everyone back into the pew in the same order.
I think if the Spiritual Communion were taught then there would be less confusion on this matter.