Print This Tract!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Church_Militant
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Church_Militant

Guest
Thank You…

Thank you so much for your concern for my soul. I deeply appreciate it, however with all due respect and all charity, the fact is that in spite of your misunderstanding, we Catholics are Christians, and part of the same Christianity that the early Apostles practiced. Our faith is the same one that began with Our Lord Jesus Christ and has endured for 2,000 years.

We Catholics believe that the Bible is the inspired Word of God; that God is a Trinity that consists of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and that we are saved by a personal relationship with the risen Lord Jesus Christ. We are “born again” and we do our best to live out that relationship by producing fruit worthy of repentance. None of us are perfect; we’re still all too human , but we confess our sins to God in obedience to the scriptures and make a moment-by-moment effort to be the best Christians that we can.

There are differences between us…They are the result of a division that occurred about 500 years ago called the Reformation. Prior to that we were all Catholics, a name which is Greek for universal and was used for all Christian churches and can be verified by the letter of Ignatius, the Bishop of the church of Antioch that he wrote to the church at Smyrna in about 107 AD. (Remember Antioch, the church in Acts 11:26 where we were first called Christians to begin with?) This name stuck in order to differentiate between the church of Christ and other heretical groups such as the Gnostics.

The difference between us is simple and fundamental. The core of the differences are the Protestant doctrines called “Sola Scriptura” (meaning Scripture Alone) and “Sola Fide” (Faith Alone). The first has to do with the verifiable fact that the early Christians relied on verbal tradition until the 4th century when the Council of Carthage settled the matter of the canon of the Bible with the 73 books that consist of the 46 books of the Alexandrian text of the Old Testament (also known as the Septuagint,) which was in Greek (not Hebrew) and the 27 books of the New Testament. As a result, the Apostles encouraged the early church to hold fast to the traditions that had been taught to them either by word or letter. Keep in mind that the last verse of Saint John’s Gospel says that not all that Jesus said and did is written down and that the entire world could not contain all the books if they were. Sacred Tradition helps us properly interpret the Word of God. It is not the “traditions of men” that Jesus condemned, since it in no way sets aside the laws of God, but along with the Bible confirms what they mean and helps to guide us into right doctrine.

2nd Thessalonians 2 :14 “Therefore, brethren, stand fast; and hold the traditions which you have learned, whether by word, or by our epistle.

2nd Thessalonians 3 :6 “And we charge you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every brother walking disorderly, and not according to the tradition which they have received of us.

The other is the doctrine that we are saved by “faith alone” and that our works have no merit before God. The fact is that a breakaway priest named Martin Luther developed both doctrines on his own authority, ignoring the fact that no one in the 1500 years of Christian history had believed any such things. In fact Luther had the audacity to add the word “alone” to Romans 3:28 in his German translation of the Bible so that it said that we are saved by faith alone, knowing full well that the Greek text does not say that at all. In fact, the only place where the words “faith” and “alone” are used together is in James 2:24 where it says, “You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.” He also removed 7 books from the canon of the Old Testament and 4 from the New, including Jude, 2nd Peter, James, and Revelation. Most of the confusion between Catholics and other Christian churches is “trickle-down effect” of these doctrines.

This is just a brief overview, but rest assured that if you are willing to do some research into authentic Catholic writings like the Catechism of the Catholic Church you will find that there are very good reasons for what we believe and practice. You can also check out authentic Catholic teachings online at Catholic.com and Vatican.va (The official Vatican Website!). For the truth about the Catholic faith, ask us, we have nothing that we want to hide. We do not attempt to proselytize people though we will readily dialog with anyone and try to answer any questions they may have concerning Catholicism. Our focus is on insuring that everyone hears the Gospel.

The harvest is indeed plentiful, so let’s be about Our Father’s business.
 
I love it, I should go the Believer’s Chapel and put it on windsheilds!

Lol! :rotfl:
 
40.png
Atreyu:
Proof-read!!

Apart from that, great work!
Thanks Atreyu! :o I somehow managed to miss all that, but I did go back and fix it and then get the forum mod to gimme a hand since the time had run out to edit it.

Feel free to copy & print it up and if you use the brochure templates in Word you can create a pretty good two-column half-fold tract with opening clip art and the whole bit. This’ll be good for those door to door guys that come by the house (unless your blue bathtub scares 'em off) and it should get the point accross without being offensive So long as ya don’t follow it with a punch in the mouth :eek: . I also recommend that you type in your parish’s name, address, & phone number as contact info on the back page.

It may take a bit of work to create exactly what you want, but hey… it’ll be worth it I think.
Pax vobiscum,
 
I have a question if you don’t mind…is this really true (see the part I bolded)? Part of our mission as Catholics **is **to help bring others to the fullnes of truth when the opportunity arises.

I think it’s a great tract and I think that may be what you were trying to say when you wrote ‘we would dialog", but this paragraph may be a bit miselading because of the parts I bolded - we do care about bringing everyone to the fullnes of truth- not just those without a faith or church (some people could even interpret "faith’ and ‘church’ to mean non-Christian religions (Hindu, Islam, etc).
Just a thought. Hope you don’t mind. I think it’s great.

**We do not attempt to evangelize people who are already part of a Christian church **though we will readily dialog with others and try to answer any questions they may have concerning Catholicism. Our focus is on our families and those without a faith or church.
 
That’s a good point Elzee, and of course winning someone to the faith is a gift from God, but what I also wanted to point out that we are NOT “sheep stealers” like some of our n-C friends. Some of the n-Cs get the mistaken impression that we don’t care about their souls because we don’t generally “witness” the way that they do. You and I both know that that is not the case at all.

Please also bear in mind that this is really meant to be sort of “counter evangelism” tract.
 
Thank you for this! I have some Evangelical neighbors who just won’t quit. Actually, they are former Catholics.😦
 
~SunShine~:
Thank you for this! I have some Evangelical neighbors who just won’t quit. Actually, they are former Catholics.😦
God bless you SunShine. Here’s a LINK to another tract that is also super good as well.
 
My impression from your thread title was that you are suggesting we get into a sort of “counter-Jack-Chick” printed tract that we can furtively distribute all over God’s creation the way the “Chick’ens” do.

Not a bad idea, if this is what you are saying, but we need a good artist. Ever notice in the Chick tracts that the Protestant men are handsome, their women are babes, the Catholic is sweaty and geeky looking and the priests are fat and obnoxious?

It may be a low blow, but I would love to see a Catholic comic tract portray a handsome priest convincing a fat, sloppy, malodorous Protestant into Catholicism where, once the Baptismal waters pour over him… Poof, instant good looks!

Thal59
 
40.png
Thal59:
My impression from your thread title was that you are suggesting we get into a sort of “counter-Jack-Chick” printed tract that we can furtively distribute all over God’s creation the way the “Chick’ens” do.

Not a bad idea, if this is what you are saying, but we need a good artist. Ever notice in the Chick tracts that the Protestant men are handsome, their women are babes, the Catholic is sweaty and geeky looking and the priests are fat and obnoxious?

It may be a low blow, but I would love to see a Catholic comic tract portray a handsome priest convincing a fat, sloppy, malodorous Protestant into Catholicism where, once the Baptismal waters pour over him… Poof, instant good looks!

Thal59
I don’t know about potraying our seperated breathern as “fat, sloppy, malodorous”. That seems sort of mean don’t you think. I think it would be fun to have a Catholic apologetics kind of comic but, I don’t think we should be bashing other people.
 
Do you have a publisher yet? I dont think my Canon ID2000 is up for the job.
 
Church Militant:
That’s a good point Elzee, and of course winning someone to the faith is a gift from God, but what I also wanted to point out that we are NOT “sheep stealers” like some of our n-C friends. Some of the n-Cs get the mistaken impression that we don’t care about their souls because we don’t generally “witness” the way that they do. You and I both know that that is not the case at all.

Please also bear in mind that this is really meant to be sort of “counter evangelism” tract.
Just some of my past technical writing critique coming through I guess…thanks!! I knew that was what you were trying to say. I was just was worried some Protestants and evangelicals may get the wrong impression. You explained it beautifully just now!
 
40.png
Thal59:
My impression from your thread title was that you are suggesting we get into a sort of “counter-Jack-Chick” printed tract that we can furtively distribute all over God’s creation the way the “Chick’ens” do.

Not a bad idea, if this is what you are saying, but we need a good artist. Ever notice in the Chick tracts that the Protestant men are handsome, their women are babes, the Catholic is sweaty and geeky looking and the priests are fat and obnoxious?

It may be a low blow, but I would love to see a Catholic comic tract portray a handsome priest convincing a fat, sloppy, malodorous Protestant into Catholicism where, once the Baptismal waters pour over him… Poof, instant good looks!

Thal59
Thal, you and Montie can relax because there actually is a great selection of Catholic cartoon tracts that bury Jack Chick’s trash with better art as well as brevity and truth.GrottoPress.org offers them and they are really very good, as well as very reasonably priced. They’d do well with most adults and teenagers.
http://www.grottopress.org/Grotto_Books/Tracts/Bible_Alone/bible.gif
http://www.grottopress.org/Grotto_Books/Tracts/Papacy/Papacy.jpg
 
~SunShine~:
Thank you for this! I have some Evangelical neighbors who just won’t quit. Actually, they are former Catholics.😦
One of the reason your former Catholic neigbors are so intent in evangelizing you is that are trying to convince themselves of the wisdom of their move as much as they trying to convert you.
 
Hi CM! I liked your tract very much 👍 except for this line:

“…and that we are saved by a personal relationship with the risen Lord Jesus Christ.”

We don’t believe that, you know. I understand you are using their terminology to get them to open their minds, but is it misleading, just the same (although unintentionally so).

We believe we are saved by grace through faith, lived out within Christ’s Church by availing ourselves of the Sacraments Christ instituted and made evident by our good works. One does not have to have “personal relationship with Christ” of the type they preach, which is unbiblical and not a part of the Sacred Tradition of Christ’s Church.
 
40.png
Della:
Hi CM! I liked your tract very much 👍 except for this line:

“…and that we are saved by a personal relationship with the risen Lord Jesus Christ.”

We don’t believe that, you know. I understand you are using their terminology to get them to open their minds, but is it misleading, just the same (although unintentionally so).

We believe we are saved by grace through faith, lived out within Christ’s Church by availing ourselves of the Sacraments Christ instituted and made evident by our good works. One does not have to have “personal relationship with Christ” of the type they preach, which is unbiblical and not a part of the Sacred Tradition of Christ’s Church.
Interesting… However. Do we not in fact maintain a close personal relationship with Our Lord? It has been my experience that the most faithful Catholics have a very tight relationship with the Lord in their prayers and all the sacraments. The terminology is theirs, and I agree, but the fact is that faithful Catholics know Our Lord very personally in a way that would qualify as that “relationship” jargon.

The very purpose of all the things that you rightly cite Della is to draw each of us ever deeper into Christ, right?
Pax tecum,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top