L
LoganBice
Guest
I see that I have stirred up a hornets nest of mixed.
Please remember I am not advocating pot or claiming it is morally correct.
Please remember I am not advocating pot or claiming it is morally correct.
This is how I feel. I am in my last year in college and iv been around it enough to see people become lazy but that’s the worst. As opposed to drinking iv seen people destroy not only their own life but others too. I don’t think people should do any drugs because it’s a form of escapism but as far as the prison system no rehabilitating people is how I feel. We need a legal reform to try and help criminals and show alittle solidarity instead of throwing them in a cage with other like minded criminals.I don’t think they should be sentenced to prison. I believe that being stoned on pot, is better than drinking. Please don’t get me wrong. I am not really an advocate for pot. However, I think between the two, I don’t believe people have aggressive behavior as they do when intoxicated with alcohol.
I believe it is a grey area. For one, THC can stay in your system for 30 days. I don’t think you can tell when the person last had it, if they test positive. Unless, you can tell by a titer lab draw.
I think marijuana should be treated like alcohol, when it comes to driving. I believe that driving while stoned can be dangerous. But, then again, how can you tell if a positive thc comes up, if it is recent. Perhaps, a failed sobriety test would give more weight in this situation.
I think instead of prison, the offenders should be sentenced to an aversion program. Repeat offenders should be required to attend a rehab.
I advocate for medical marijuana. However, not in a form where you smoke it. Marinol is a great oral form of thc to simulate appetite. Many elderly do not have any appetite and have malnutrition.
I am on the fence for legalization of it.
I do not believe that people are rehabilitated in prison. It is more of getting people out of society, and sometimes that is truly necessary. I think marijuana use is a lesser offense and should not be punishable to prison. We want the end result to be rehabilitation. I believe there are other ways. Something more where the punishment fits the crime.
Yes. I agree with this. I had to vote for “always” but the poll was worded incorrectly. Also to note that “prison” and jail are two very different things.I guess the first choice is the best representation of my view though I take exception to the use of “always”. There should be some provision in the law for first time offenders with regard to possession for personal use. But anyone who sells should go to jail. And anyone who provides marijuana - for sale or for “free” - to a minor should go to jail. I don’t buy into the hooker or the drug dealer with a heart of gold fiction. Not only is drug dealing a larger crime, it is material cooperation in a violent, immoral industry.
Now there is a separate discussion as to whether the amount of incarceration is proportionate to the crime. But that’s a bigger issue than just marijuana.![]()
My apologies. I should have added a fourth options.Yes. I agree with this. I had to vote for “always” but the poll was worded incorrectly.
You may have the issue backward. Perhaps the government (fed) “look the other way policy” did not just happen with immigration, but rather when the federal government refused to prosecute or enforce federal drug policy especially with marijuana. That state governments “legalized” it makes no difference that a federal crime is being committed.Eh, I have a problem with government enforcing one group of laws like drugs while actively aiding and abetting the violation of another group of laws like immigration. Amnesty for all.
What is the purpose of laws and jail? We make laws and enforce then with jail time in part to protect people partially through deterrence and also by removing them from society.I don’t see how it’s relevant. In fact, that position is a non sequitur. It doesn’t matter if the victim is one in the same (and I believe an argument can be made that there are other victims in the drug trade besides the user). That’s only relevant if you are arguing for legalization. In this case, the topic is on the punishement for breaking a law…for doing something that is already illegal.
For some, yes. But it also makes sense to commit the crime if one believes the punishment or even the law itself is unjust. If you believe a law is wrong aren’t you likely work at not getting caught instead of complying?So my question still stands: If jail time for commiting a crime is more damaging than the crime itself, wouldn’t it make more sense for a person to first avoid the crime, and THEN push for legalization in a way that doesn’t involve them going to jail?
No it doesn’t, unless you change the argument. It’s either a non sequitur (it doesn’t follow that something should become legal just because productive people engage in it) or a strawman (you change the argument) or *special pleading *(you move the goal posts).
Well, first of all, that wasn’t what was being discussed. You commited a logical fallacy to arrive at that comment from my response to another person’s comment. Second of all, you are *begging the question *(circular reasoning) by presuming that “the harm caused would be minimal”.
That’s what i get for replying on my breaks during a stressful work day.I dont’ think anyone is arguing that.
Yes. It’s also used as punishment for breaking a law. That’s my only point there…that we are talking about something which is already illegal [for the most part].What is the purpose of laws and jail? We make laws and enforce then with jail time in part to protect people partially through deterrence and also by removing them from society.
For some, yes. But it also makes sense to commit the crime if one believes the punishment or even the law itself is unjust. If you believe a law is wrong aren’t you likely work at not getting caught instead of complying?
Jim Crow laws used to be on the books but many believed they were wrong and wilfully violated them while attempting to push for change.
Yes, exactly. If a law is unjust I would see no reason to imprison someone for breaking it. Rosa Parks is a shining example. I just don’t think that Marijuana qualifies as ‘just vs. unjust’. But that’s when we start discussing opinions. My own opinion is that there’s nothing unjust in keeping pot illegal, so it makes sense to lock up folks who break that law.A small, less politically charged example is the speed limit. Lots of people follow it when the police are around but as soon as they can get away with it they regularly break that law even though the ticket (over $400 sometimes ) plus higher insurance rates are a harsh penalty. It isn’t jail but why wouldn’t we expect human nature to extend to more severe crimes?
That’s what i get for replying on my breaks during a stressful work day.
I agree. There is no just reason to legalize Marijuana. Which is why i posed the question of if the legal consequence for possession of Marijuana is in line with the gravity of the crime. Basically the whole notion of cruel and unusual punishment. I personally think jail time for people who are caught with an amount without intention to distributed is cruel and unusual.Yes, exactly. If a law is unjust I would see no reason to imprison someone for breaking it. Rosa Parks is a shining example. I just don’t think that Marijuana qualifies as ‘just vs. unjust’. But that’s when we start discussing opinions. My own opinion is that there’s nothing unjust in keeping pot illegal, so it makes sense to lock up folks who break that law.
But as I said earlier, I also take no issue with the legalization of pot.
Ok, sidestepping my stance that it should be legal, is there a point that the resources and effects of enforcing a law make it better not to enforce that law or reduce enforcement?I agree. There is no just reason to legalize Marijuana. Which is why i posed the question of if the legal consequence for possession of Marijuana is in line with the gravity of the crime. Basically the whole notion of cruel and unusual punishment. I personally think jail time for people who are caught with an amount without intention to distributed is cruel and unusual.
I would say so. The war on drugs is a prime example. Billions upon billions are dumped into a endless war that has not changed much. People may claim, “we need to wage a war on drugs.” But there are many other things that are illegal that we do not declare war on. If weed became legal I don’t think it would be the worst thing in the world. I believe there isn’t a morally justifiable reason to legalize another drug, but at the same time there isn’t a huge moral justification for dumping billions of dollars to keep people from doing something that does not equate to the amount of money spend combating it. From a logical standpoint the legalization makes sense from an economic and health effects standpoint. What I mean is if you argue that it should be illegal because it is unhealthy then one must also admit that alcohol, tobacco, fast food, prescription pills, tanning, among other things are all also is bad if not worse. So if the argument is strictly based of health then it logically makes no sense to keep it illegal. From an economic standpoint it would make sense to legalize it because it could be regulated, taxed, create business and another economic stimulant. But from a moral standpoint it is hard to justify. As a nonbeliever I assume you don’t think it is immoral but you can’t claim that it is moral. Im assuming you would see it as neutral. So from a Catholic perspective I don’t see a moral justification for its legalization but I also believe that the resources spent on it, prison time, and lack of rehabilitation is a great injustice in itself.Ok, sidestepping my stance that it should be legal, is there a point that the resources and effects of enforcing a law make it better not to enforce that law or reduce enforcement?
If we say that we enforce something because it is the law then the IRS should conduct a much greater number of audits and pursue collection efforts even if unprofitable. But I doubt many would support that.
For dealing yes they should go to prison.Heres an interesting question and one that bothers me.
First lets get some context and my view here. I think that marijuana isn’t quite as big of a deal as people make it (heck science has proven it isn’t as deadly, damaging, or impairing as alcohol). Now don’t get me wrong. I am not advocating the use of it nor am I saying that is not sinful to do it because it is a drug that intoxicated you in a way and isn’t productive to a relationship with God. Anyway…
Do you personally think it is morally acceptable to send people to prison for marijuana?
My opinion no. I don’t think someone should be stripped of their freedom and place in society because they use, for the most part, a harmless drug. Now is it still a drug? Yes. Is it morally correct to use? Probably not. But is it worth years behind bars? Absolutely not.
I think that sexual impurity and masturbation are more serious sins and those are propagated in our culture.
I think that that the punishment is much heavier then the offense, which in itself is an injustice. If there is going to be a punishable crime for marijuana use I think it needs to reflect the gravity of the crime, so at most a fine or some other punishment that doesn’t require possibly years of jail time.
Sidenote: I am speaking about people who get caught with marijuana for there use or your average college age drug dealer who sells some to pay bills. I am NOT talking about those who grow massive quantities of it to distribute, which would justify a harsher punishment.
Absolutely agree. The disparity being allowed between state and federal drug laws on marijuana are another example of the breakdown in law and order. It’s insane that in California while the state has passed medical marijuana laws the feds can, and still do occasionally, arrest and prosecute folks. When they do the state doesn’t jump in to defend them, they’re left to twist in the wind.You may have the issue backward. Perhaps the government (fed) “look the other way policy” did not just happen with immigration, but rather when the federal government refused to prosecute or enforce federal drug policy especially with marijuana. That state governments “legalized” it makes no difference that a federal crime is being committed.
You can thank the last two presidents for both problems…
You left out the costs of crime associated with it from the user on up to the cartels. It’s like prohibition of alcohol, the increased profits which could be made drove gangs and the activity associated with them. All the problems with drugs (marijuana and others) are not going away until the demand for them drops… there seems to be plenty of demand regardless of what the laws are, the costs to drugs, or penalties imposed.I would say so. The war on drugs is a prime example. Billions upon billions are dumped into a endless war that has not changed much. People may claim, “we need to wage a war on drugs.” But there are many other things that are illegal that we do not declare war on. If weed became legal I don’t think it would be the worst thing in the world. I believe there isn’t a morally justifiable reason to legalize another drug, but at the same time there isn’t a huge moral justification for dumping billions of dollars to keep people from doing something that does not equate to the amount of money spend combating it. From a logical standpoint the legalization makes sense from an economic and health effects standpoint. What I mean is if you argue that it should be illegal because it is unhealthy then one must also admit that alcohol, tobacco, fast food, prescription pills, tanning, among other things are all also is bad if not worse. So if the argument is strictly based of health then it logically makes no sense to keep it illegal. From an economic standpoint it would make sense to legalize it because it could be regulated, taxed, create business and another economic stimulant. But from a moral standpoint it is hard to justify. As a nonbeliever I assume you don’t think it is immoral but you can’t claim that it is moral. Im assuming you would see it as neutral. So from a Catholic perspective I don’t see a moral justification for its legalization but I also believe that the resources spent on it, prison time, and lack of rehabilitation is a great injustice in itself.
So basically Im saying is that morally you shouldn’t do it but there is something wrong with the way that it is handled in the legal system.