L
laocmo
Guest
Once again, since it hasn’t been answered, just how are we supposed to separate the true revelations from the non-true? Some bum on the street full of Mad Dog Red says God told him the world will end, we dismiss him. Carlos Castaneda high on peyote writes something about his revelations, we dismiss him. But if someone like the author of the Book of Revelations whose writings appear very much like those of someone affected by LSD, we put them in the Bible. At Fatima a supposed revelation that there would be a new and more terrible war than WWI would come about worried a lot of people. Anyone who has read the history of that first war and the harsh punishments meted out to Germany after it, could be assured the German state would sooner or later go to war again. Personally I accept no revelations, and those that seem to come true are nothing but good guesses.Private revelations are granted by God, at His discretion and for His purposes. Many are never reported; the fruits of the experiences are intended to be shown in the lives of the recipients, benefiting others indirectly.
Always seemed odd to me that if God, Mary, etc. felt something was important enough to be a revelation, they gave it to some individual rather to all of us. I would never trust an individual revelation to be anything but something created by the individual’s stressed, sick, or impaired mind.