Pro-Abortion Group: Tebow Super Bowl Ad Promotes Domestic Violence

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

juliee

Guest
Washington, DC – Unable to gain any tradition by calling the Focus on the Family Tim Tebow Super Bowl ad extremist or over the top, pro-abortion groups today are offering a new dig on the commercial. The president of NOW and other abortion advocates claim the ad promotes domestic violence.

lifenews.com/nat5975.html
 
:rolleyes:

Sometimes my baby boy pulls my hair when he nurses. I guess I need to start scolding him and teaching him violence against women is not acceptable.😃
 
Wow. There are no extreme depths to which they won’t sink to try and censor people they disagree with.
 
This has got to be the most ludicrous thing I’ve read about in quite awhile. :rolleyes: NOW must be getting really desperate.
 
juliee said:
Washington, DC – Unable to gain any tradition by calling the Focus on the Family Tim Tebow Super Bowl ad extremist or over the top, pro-abortion groups today are offering a new dig on the commercial. The president of NOW and other abortion advocates claim the ad promotes domestic violence.
Click to expand...
is their any more violent crime of domestic violence than deliberately murdering, or paying someone to murder, your own baby?
 
Don’t they even feel the need to disguise their agenda any more?
 
When was the ad shown during the Super Bowl? I didn’t see it at all during the game. I kept thinking “when is it going to be shown”?

I hope it wasn’t preempted by local cable with a local ad.
 
The more they speak out - the more foolish they look.

Not that my opinion matters at all but in the beginning of all of this - if they call themselves pro-choice - then what’s the matter of one of the choices being “life”.

I suppose they need to change their label as pro-abortion.
 
I missed the ad – was preparing sandwiches at the time. It aired right after the “Betty White” Snickers ad as I have found out. I’ve now seen both versions online.

I don’t see NOW’s point other than to grasp at anything to hang onto. The message was so sweet that NOW had to imply violence. Tebow’s mother says “we have to be tough” and then gets “tackled” by Tebow (it’s a football game folks!). Notice his mother gets up first, unfazed then Tebow joins her. If anything, the commercial shows Tebow’s mother as strong and recovered faster than her son.

In my younger days I played football or “hotbox” ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hotbox_%28baseball%29 ) with girls and guys in my neighborhood and everyone was getting the occasional bruise and/or scrape. Never once did the subject of “violence against women” come up – we were all friends.

NOW should remember/recognize that perhaps half the abortions are violence against women. Some countries and territories promote “sex-selective” abortions – with the “choice” being women.
 
dontknow said:
The more they speak out - the more foolish they look.

Not that my opinion matters at all but in the beginning of all of this - if they call themselves pro-choice - then what’s the matter of one of the choices being “life”.

I suppose they need to change their label as pro-abortion.
Click to expand...
WE need to change the label. WE need to make sure that no one who means pro-abortion can get away with calling it ‘pro-choice.’
 
Wow. How disgusting. To what depths will the pro-choice agenda sink to next?? 🤷:confused:
 
evidently NOW no longer espouses the position they took up militantly in earlier years of their unholy campaign for “equal rights” when they encouraged girls and women to play football and other sports on an equal basis with boys and men. They now regard such participation as “domestic violence.”
 
I googled the subject and got this article, which I found very encouraging given that the author identifies herself as prochoice. I almost dare to hope that the conversation about abortion in this country may be turning a corner. And I also note that the author distinguishes between her own “prochoice” stance and that of NOW, which she sees as genuinely pro-abortion. That’s one reason why I think that fighting the “prochoice” label is counter-productive. Of course they are talking about a particular kind of choice, just as prolife has come to mean pro-unborn-life. But there really is a difference between folks like Jenkins and the pro-abortion fanatics at NOW (or the reprehensible Katherine Hancock Ragsdale+, who is unfortunately a priest in my denomination and the dean of one of its seminaries). The prolife movement will not benefit from ignoring this difference.

Edwin
 
TheWhoFreak said:
Hardy, hardy, har har har.
No really, what does N.O.W. mean?
Click to expand...
Purportedly, National Organization of Women.

In reality?.. nags opposing wholesomeness? Hmmm…

Seriously? The ad was so low-key that if I didn’t already know what it was about, I wouldn’t guess what it was about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top