"pro Choice? Don't receive Holy Communion"

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you copy and paste the link, it will work.It worked for me.
 
I hope he writes a letter to Archbishop Wuerl of Washington DC.
 
What is the real difference between legislators of abortion and voters who helped put Obama in office?

I don’t see any difference.
 
No, don’t bother to pray for their conversion. Just kick them out. :rolleyes:
 
YipYupYep said:
What is the real difference between legislators of abortion and voters who helped put Obama in office?

I don’t see any difference.
Click to expand...
There is a difference in the issuer of their paychecks. That’s about it.
 
Newbie2 said:
No, don’t bother to pray for their conversion. Just kick them out. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
This is what you do not understand. By refusing them Holy Communion, is is being pointed out how very serious their stance is. The point is NOT, as you and other WRONGLY claim, to kick them out. No, it is to bring them back into full communion with the Church.

In addition, when someone receive Holy Communion is a state of grave sin, they commit a very grave offense against the Body and Blood of Christ. Preventing them from committing such sacrilege is an act of great mercy.

To be joyful over someone leaving the Church is not ideal. However, if a person who obstinately rejects a critical moral teaching, even after counseling, choose to leave, at least their bad influence leaves with them.
 
rpp said:
This is what you do not understand. By refusing them Holy Communion, is is being pointed out how very serious their stance is. The point is NOT, as you and other WRONGLY claim, to kick them out. No, it is to bring them back into full communion with the Church.

In addition, when someone receive Holy Communion is a state of grave sin, they commit a very grave offense against the Body and Blood of Christ. Preventing them from committing such sacrilege is an act of great mercy.

To be joyful over someone leaving the Church is not ideal. However, if a person who obstinately rejects a critical moral teaching, even after counseling, choose to leave, at least their bad influence leaves with them.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: = sarcasm 😉
 
rpp said:
This is what you do not understand. By refusing them Holy Communion, is is being pointed out how very serious their stance is. The point is NOT, as you and other WRONGLY claim, to kick them out. No, it is to bring them back into full communion with the Church.

In addition, when someone receive Holy Communion is a state of grave sin, they commit a very grave offense against the Body and Blood of Christ. Preventing them from committing such sacrilege is an act of great mercy.

To be joyful over someone leaving the Church is not ideal. However, if a person who obstinately rejects a critical moral teaching, even after counseling, choose to leave, at least their bad influence leaves with them.
Click to expand...
My dear frind in Christ,

Nobody, NOBODY is “joyful” about anyone leaving the RCC.

I happen to know AB Raymond Burke personally.

He continues to be the Director of the Marian Catecheist Apostolate, to which I am most greatful to be associated with.🙂

I know for a fact , that He and a few other Bishoips whose names you would know have met in private with these VERY VISIBLE and clearly greviously sinful Politicians(fact, not personal judgement), because they have been so advised.

It is the very fact that they continue in their highly publized obstinance, that clearly encourages others to do the same, is a GREAT scandal. Pathetic!

Refusing to accept the rebukes, does not negate the sin!

It is precisely because of the public scandal, that these actions are made necessary.😦 😊 :eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top