Abortion and the abortion pics ARE inappropriate. The only reason that you are saying that I am not pro-life is because I don’t agree with graphic images. Read the other thread more carefully.
Alright carjack, if I get some time later I will go over the thread mapleoak posted your comment from.
Suppose you address calling the website disgusting. Suppose you address the fact that you will not be reasonable and admit that no one is “shoving the pictures into the faces of preschoolers” and that the pro-lifers on this board are defending that action.
The pictures do have a place. If you are pro-life then you would be for the appropriate use of any and every possible tool we may use to turn others to the side of LIFE. You would recognize the difference between the horrendous act and the picture that may dipict that act. You make no distinction. That lack of a distinction in your mind, makes me suspicious. When I add that to the violent tone you have taken here, along with the things you have said, I conclude that you resemble, the pro-abort people I know more than the pro-life people I know.
Pro-lifers wouldn’t call someone a terrorist for example for pointing out the fact that showing a picture of abortion to a pro-abort is like throwing holy water on Satan. Like Satan would do at being so burned, the pro-abort individual will lash out. And you lashed out. Calling the pro-lifers on this board who might appropriately use pictures in thier work, EXTREME AND TERRORISTS. You resort to something that is a depiction of violence. That’s what pro-aborts do. They resort to violence in an effort to prop up the violence they defend. Pro-lifers need police protection to exercise their right of free speech because of this.
You have said that even the appropriate use of the pictures is extreme. They are not. No change can be effected as long as people are able to deny that an injustice is occuring. Pictures have historically been used to end injustice. People deny the haulocaust, until they see the pictures. People deny genocide in other parts of the world, until they see the pictures. People deny that a child dies when a woman chooses abortion, until they see the picutures. Without the pictures, people will stay in denial. Without the pictures hearts and minds will stay hardened and closed.
How many words have we wasted on this thread talking to Marrietta? Have they had even an inkling of an effect on her? NO! She hides behind words. She hides behind the word CHOICE. If we were really the extreme terrorists you say we are then we would be aborting her. We are not. We are not even advocating that we should have that right, unlike the other side which insists that the right to kill is in the constitution.
It is not terroism to show someone a truth in the only way we can which makes it impossible for them to deny that truth. You are mistaken in your belief that children (en masse) are being traumatized by this and even if they were, it would be a small price to pay if it saved just the number of babies that have been killed, today, Thursday of this first week in June, in America alone, in the time it took me to type this out. The number is in the hundreds.
You can prove to me that you went to the web-site and looked at anything other than the homepage. Suppose you describe just one of the GAP signs for me. There are more than a dozen. You choose which one. Prove yourself here, if you are so intent on having us believe you. Right now, I don’t.
I don’t watch graphic movies and look at graphic pics. so I don’t appreciate people trying to force the “mass” of people to look at them.
I’m not that good at this yet.
good point there.