Pro-Homosexual Marriage Advocates - Why Can't They Answer This Question?

[Sparkythedog]

You don’t need to be a lawyer, just a citizen. What matters is whether a good reason to legally establish such relationships exist. If you can’t argue the pros, and persuade a good chunk of your fellow citizens, it won’t happen. You seek to introduce new legal constructs - the onus to define, and make the case, sits with you.

I guess I wasn’t quite clear. I’m not proposing that it be made legal. I’m not in a poly marriage so the legality of it doesn’t effect me. However if someone else wanted it to be made legal, I have not heard any convincing argument against it.

 

[JimG]

I guess I wasn’t quite clear. I’m not proposing that it be made legal. I’m not in a poly marriage so the legality of it doesn’t effect me. However if someone else wanted it to be made legal, I have not heard any convincing argument against it.

A starting point would be this: Persons attempting a poly marriage and being refused, could file suit in a federal court alleging violation of the 14th amendment, since they were being denied equal protection of the law because of their sexual orientation. They would petition for marriage equality.

 

[Rau]

I guess I wasn’t quite clear. I’m not proposing that it be made legal. I’m not in a poly marriage so the legality of it doesn’t effect me. However if someone else wanted it to be made legal, I have not heard any convincing argument against it.

Perhaps you haven’t, which is fine so long as you agree that that does not constitute grounds to create the legal framework!