Pro Life versus Pro Choice Debate

  • Thread starter Thread starter gakroeger
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Caramel said:
I HAVE ASKED THREE TIMES NOW YET YOU DO NOT ANSWER!! WHAT WOULD YOU

DO TO STOP ABORTION??

At this point I assume you CAN’T answer the question - you sidestep it with references to government and law. You keep going on and on about limited government but I haven’t seen one post by YOU that states what YOU would do about the problem of abortion!!

If you do not even have the ability to answer my question (and I don’t think you have) why not just admit it?? You consistently put down other posters’ ideas about government but you can’t come up with ONE THING THAT YOU WOULD DO IN ORDER TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM. All you do is play Devil’s Advocate - you really do not seem to have anything CONSTRUCTIVE to add to this debate.

At this point I suspect you will continue with your “law law law law I can’t hear you law law law” routine.

I can only think that you really do not know…
Click to expand...
Caramel, this was provided in other posts, and frankly the habit you have of placing things in capital letters indicates a certain lack of respect for other posters. People have only so much time to respond here.

And if you do not want to read all those prior post then------what do you think those other *non-coercive *means would be to help a women choose not to have an abortion? I mean come on, think about it----it would be anything you can come up with.

Peace my friend. :blessyou:
 
As this thread is over 1000 posts I would suggest you folks make your final remarks as I will probably close it tonight.
Thanks.
 
Worthy5 said:
Caramel, I disagree that it is off topic for reasons stated sometime ago. And I do not care what GW Bush has to say, not that I believe he said that anyway.
Click to expand...
quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote/george_bush_quote_aa91

capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml

theimmoralminority.blogspot.com/2005/12/george-bush-quote-stop-throwing.html

I know you don’t care what Bush said and I know you don’t believe it anyway, but for anyone who is interested, here are three links. I could get more but I think these three are sufficient.

I have this quote posted on my fridge at home - it shows the utter disregard for the Constitution that a person in high office can demonstrate.
 
CWBetts said:
You are not saying anything new. Your trying to “win” the argument by focusing on the subjective reality of the fetus----an emotional pull. But this shows why the concept of justice is subjective. What is justice to an individual is litigated in the courts everyday.

The point is not to " win" the argument. You can have your position–it is reasonable to hold. But you have to except its policy trade-offs and should at least acknowledge that certain aspects of the " pro-choice" position can be reasonable held by others. Someone can be against abortion just not in favor of yours means on how best to prevent it.
Click to expand...
The point is truth is truth. The pro life position is correct, not because of any debating points but because it is based on an objective moral truth.

One is not pro life if one endorses legalized abortion. “Trade-offs” are for prudential issues, not for issues of protection of life.
 
:
fix said:
The point is truth is truth. The pro life position is correct, not because of any debating points but because it is based on an objective moral truth.

One is not pro life if one endorses legalized abortion. “Trade-offs” are for prudential issues, not for issues of protection of life.
Click to expand...
:clapping::clapping::clapping
 
fix said:
The point is truth is truth. The pro life position is correct, not because of any debating points but because it is based on an objective moral truth.

One is not pro life if one endorses legalized abortion. “Trade-offs” are for prudential issues, not for issues of protection of life.
Click to expand...
:clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
fix said:
The point is truth is truth. The pro life position is correct, not because of any debating points but because it is based on an objective moral truth.

One is not pro life if one endorses legalized abortion. “Trade-offs” are for prudential issues, not for issues of protection of life.
Click to expand...
:clapping::clapping::clapping::clapping:
 
Worthy5 said:
:clapping::clapping::clapping:
Click to expand...
I see that you have time to respond to others’ posts yet you still have not answered my question. I don’t understand why. I really want to know if you have any concrete ideas about how to stop abortions.

Worthy, what would you do to stop abortions??

This thread will probably close tonight. This is the last time I will ask this question of you. If you don’t answer I will feel forced to come to the conclusion that you just don’t have any ideas re this issue at all or that you have me on your “ignore” list.

I’m not trying to attack you in any way. I don’t understand why you don’t reply to these posts. If you don’t have the solution, fine, just say so. But if you have any ideas of what steps we could to take to stop abortions why don’t you share them with others who also want to stop abortions?? :confused:
 
Caramel said:
I see that you have time to respond to others’ posts yet you still have not answered my question. I don’t understand why. I really want to know if you have any concrete ideas about how to stop abortions.
Worthy, what would you do to stop abortions??
Click to expand...
Sorry time is up. Congrats on a great thread!:clapping::clapping::clapping:
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top