S
STT
Guest
I was wondering about what Love is in the phrase “God is Love”. The phrase does not carry any information if Love is God otherwise Love is something different than God which this is against simplicity of God.
Language is a human attempt to express what we know. When we expect words to be everything for us they will fall short, and your thread will go in semantic circles.I was wondering about what Love is in the phrase “God is Love”. The phrase does not carry any information if Love is God otherwise Love is something different than God which this is against simplicity of God.
There are many definitions of both the verb (to love) and noun (love). The theological meaning of the noun love is:I was wondering about what Love is in the phrase “God is Love”. The phrase does not carry any information if Love is God otherwise Love is something different than God which this is against simplicity of God.
8a. God’s tender regard and concern for all human beings (Collins Dictionary, American)
9a. God’s benevolent attitude towards humankind (Collins Dictionary, British)
Whether or not one acknowledges God it doesn’t change that, from the Christian perspective, any act of love is still in the image of God, a similitude of God, albeit limited.Another problem occurs when love comes from someone who either does not know or does not believe in Jehovah. If you want to say he gets credit for love in those cases, then we can assign all sorts of attributes to beings without a whiff of proof.
Love isn’t about getting credit. It’s a act of the will simply and purely for the sake of the other. Credit is results and love isn’t contingent on results.I think people (especially those evangelizing) should maybe avoid the phrase “God is love” until there is an agreed-upon meaning for love in that context.
Another problem occurs when love comes from someone who either does not know or does not believe in Jehovah. If you want to say he gets credit for love in those cases, then we can assign all sorts of attributes to beings without a whiff of proof.
Jesus must love each and everyone of us as he loves himself, if he was prepared to die for us. The second greatest commandment defines love.should maybe avoid the phrase “God is love” until there is an agreed-upon meaning for love in that context.
Wow. Interesting times, aren’t they? Do they consider this to be love towards the baby too? “O baby, I love you so much, I’ll help your mother and other people commit the grave sin of tearing you apart.driving someone to get an abortion is love,
My argument stands regardless of what Love is, whether it can be described by language or not.Language is a human attempt to express what we know. When we expect words to be everything for us they will fall short, and your thread will go in semantic circles.
So God is willing the good of another? Aren’t you personifying Love?Love is willing the good of another.
goout:![]()
My argument stands regardless of what Love is, whether it can be described by language or not.Language is a human attempt to express what we know. When we expect words to be everything for us they will fall short, and your thread will go in semantic circles.
Well, you’re asking a linguistic question about the meaning of words, as bolded above.I was wondering about what Love is in the phrase “God is Love”. The phrase does not carry any information if Love is God otherwise Love is something different than God which this is against simplicity of God.
That is right. We cannot speak about God because our words compare the Divine to our humanly experienced concepts. What we say is bound to be as untrue as it is true.I was wondering about what Love is in the phrase “God is Love”. The phrase does not carry any information if Love is God otherwise Love is something different than God which this is against simplicity of God.
Have you ever been in love?You mean Holy Spirit? I have difficulty accepting Love as a person.