Problems with EWTN

  • Thread starter Thread starter netmilsmom
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I scratched my head over the rock music in the mass quote. All the masses that I have seen on EWTN seem very reverent, with NO rock music.:confused:

I love EWTN, especially the Journey Home. The channel has really been a support to my Catholic faith while living in a state that is full of evangelical Baptists.
 
I love EWTN- i am a traditional catholic and watch it always- i think the daily mass is:thumbsup: probably the best representation of novus ordo with reverence. i wish our parishes here had tradtitional music and more reverence. i don’t have access to a tridentine mass but really appreciate EWTN for being a light in the wilderness.👍
 
I love EWTN, in fact we got Dish tv just for that reason. This is just a personal thought, but at Mass, when they read the readings, most of the time it is read without any emotion, sort of being read like a robot, or something. I don’t want them to be theatrical when they read, but it would be more interesting if they put a little more feeling into it. Has anybody noticed this, or is it just me? But that is my only complaint. Everything else is just great.
 
I love EWTN, in fact we got Dish tv just for that reason. This is just a personal thought, but at Mass, when they read the readings, most of the time it is read without any emotion, sort of being read like a robot, or something. I don’t want them to be theatrical when they read, but it would be more interesting if they put a little more feeling into it. Has anybody noticed this, or is it just me? But that is my only complaint. Everything else is just great.
I have seen/witnessed this at other parishes I have attended…
 
I keep seeing people on this new forum state that they have a problem with EWTN.

Could you expound on it?
The “Conventual Mass” at the Monastery that is broadcast on TV was always celebrated “ad orientum”. That is until Bishop Foley came along and placed his mark on the network by declaring that all televised Masses from the Monastery that are broadcast on EWTN be done facing the people. There was also a large reduction on the Latin used on the televised masses.

Ken
 
I love EWTN, in fact we got Dish tv just for that reason. This is just a personal thought, but at Mass, when they read the readings, most of the time it is read without any emotion, sort of being read like a robot, or something. I don’t want them to be theatrical when they read, but it would be more interesting if they put a little more feeling into it. Has anybody noticed this, or is it just me? But that is my only complaint. Everything else is just great.
What is amazing in the TLM…that is what I would least expect to see- mannarisms and personality and “feeling” of the person.

Ken
 
The “Conventual Mass” at the Monastery that is broadcast on TV was always celebrated “ad orientum”. That is until Bishop Foley came along and placed his mark on the network by declaring that all televised Masses from the Monastery that are broadcast on EWTN be done facing the people. There was also a large reduction on the Latin used on the televised masses.Ken
What are the terms of the bishop’s order? I thought it merely restricted the manner of celebration of masses to be broadcast. Not the broadcast of any particular type of mass. Couldn’t they just use ad orientum masses celebrated outside the diocese, and broadcast those?
 
I keep seeing people on this new forum state that they have a problem with EWTN.

Could you expound on it?
I wish they’d only show the Mass, the rosary, and the divine mercy chaplet twice a day (and lose the Divine Mercy Chaplet show that sounds like they’re at a funeral).

The little fanfares they play throughout the day are a lot louder than everything else- they’re annoying.

They seem to think that men must either be clergy or husbands. There is no appreciation for the lay single vocation.
 
Isn’t Mr. Ferrara the gentleman who went to Rome after Dominus Iesus was released from the CDF, and he tried to tell Cardinal Ratzinger what was wrong with the document? IOW, the document wasn’t hard-hitting enough.

I only say this to help those who may be scandalized that someone would even write such a book.

Consider the author in your discernment.
 
I wish they’d only show the Mass, the rosary, and the divine mercy chaplet twice a day (and lose the Divine Mercy Chaplet show that sounds like they’re at a funeral).

The little fanfares they play throughout the day are a lot louder than everything else- they’re annoying.

They seem to think that men must either be clergy or husbands. There is no appreciation for the lay single vocation.
I’d agree with you on the Rosary, it’s on entirely too often!

But Mass is important - many of the people who watch it are either homebound or work odd shifts, and don’t get the opportunity to attend in person, so it makes sense to rebroadcast it fairly regularly.
 
Hello everyone. This has been an interesting forum to read. In defense of Abortion being played over and over again on EWTN. This month is the prolife march month so I assume that is why. I am a stay at home mom and EWTN is on all the time. I love just listening to it while I am working on other stuff. My point is I didnt notice abortion stuff on too much before January. On and off, especially from Father Frank Pavone. Not that I would mind if It was. It’s awful and people need to hear it. Over and Over if necessary.
 
I really enjoy much of the EWTN lineup. The Mass is, of course, so important to broadcast, and I’m glad they repeat it a couple of times in the day. I love the shows with Father Mitch Pacwa, Journey Home, Scott Hahn’s show, Father Corapi, Father Benedict, Life on the Rock - and several others too! I think they all serve an important function in helping us learn more about our faith. And believe me, with a Protestant husband, they teach a lot to non-Catholics too!
 
I don’t see what is so evil about EWTN. What do you expect them to show? People flagellating themselves? The burning of protestant heretics? I don’t get it.

Now, if only they could broadcast the Holy Mass of the Latin Rite (both NO and TLM – not from the EWTN chapel necessarily) as well as the Divine Liturgy from various other (Eastern) Rites, I’d be really, really excited.

An exploration of Catholic diversity is the only thing I think EWTN lacks. And that itself isn’t too bad.
 
Is anyone listening to the Homily right now (1/21/07)?

Fr. Anthony Mary is RIGHT ON!

Did anyone else hear President Bush’s proclaimation?
 
Never mind…Found it:D
lifenews.com/nat2883.html
*President Bush issued the following proclamation on Friday, declaring Sunday as National Sanctity of Human Life Day and urging Americans to take part in pro-life activities that recognize the humanity of the unborn child: *
*America was founded on the principle that we are all endowed by our Creator with the right to life and that every individual has dignity and worth. National Sanctity of Human Life Day helps foster a culture of life and reinforces our commitment to building a compassionate society that respects the value of every human being. *
 
I don’t see what is so evil about EWTN. What do you expect them to show? People flagellating themselves? The burning of protestant heretics? I don’t get it.

Now, if only they could broadcast the Holy Mass of the Latin Rite (both NO and TLM – not from the EWTN chapel necessarily) as well as the Divine Liturgy from various other (Eastern) Rites, I’d be really, really excited.

An exploration of Catholic diversity is the only thing I think EWTN lacks. And that itself isn’t too bad.
I agree. It would be great if EWTN exposed its viewers more regularly to the diversity of rites within the Church (and within each rite of the Church).

(EWTN does do a good job of giving due criticism to the *illegitimate *diversity we see in the liturgical abuses of the past 40 years.)

Still, I do think EWTN does explore the diversity you speak of to a certain extent, if not on a weekly basis.

It is great that Father Mitch Pacwa is a priest in both the Latin and Maronite rites (and he’s not even of Lebanese descent, but of Polish!). Occasionally EWTN shows the Maronite liturgy as it also does the Byzantine (Uniate) liturgy.

A week or two ago, Marcus Grodi interviewed a former Anglican priest who had converted and brought the core of his old Anglican parish with him; the priest obtained authorization to practice an “Anglican usage” mass which differs somewhat from the Novus Ordo (for instance its English is more archaic than that of the NO translation – more to the Traditionalist taste, I’d venture!). If not for this EWTN program, I would not have known that an “Anglican usage” mass was an option, something that I imagine I would find very helpful if I were an Anglican being drawn “home to Rome.” This “Anglican usage” mass is no less legitimate within the Latin rite than the Mozarabic liturgy used in Toledo and the Ambrosian in Milan.

BTW, if converts from Judaism want to have the Church approve a “Hebrew Rite,” I do not see any problem with it – when the Apostles under the Holy Spirit’s guidance decided to accept Gentile converts without demanding that they conform to circumcision and the Jewish dietary laws, they did not turn around and forbid Jewish Christians from continuing with those things. And any modern “Hebrew Rite” would be asking to keep far less of Judaic practice (a mass using Hebrew prayers is basically all, I imagine).

I guess what I sense in these complaints about EWTN being too modernist is some people’s allergy to the actual and legitimate diversity within the Church. I am not a big fan of rock music at Mass, but, as long as the content of the lyrics is orthodox, I don’t see anything wrong in drawing young people in, in to worship and the Mass, with catchy tunes. The important thing is that they don’t get stuck thinking that they can only “get into” the Mass if they have that kind of music. They should learn how to appreciate Gregorian chant and other traditional liturgical music (indeed also the singing of the Byzantine and other Eastern Rites). In a word, their taste in liturgical music should become truly catholic.

My only complaint with EWTN is that politically they seem to be a little “right” of the Holy See itself. There is legitimate room for differences of political opinion among faithful Catholics, and I think that many of the commentators on EWTN do not seem to be able to help making one type of political opinion seem more genuinely Catholic than another. In days past in the US, to be a Catholic meant one voted Democrat. Now it seems from the type of commentary one often hears on EWTN one would think the pendulum had swung the other way (the older bishops’ preferences aside).

I just think a Catholic broadcasting network should be more detached from partisanship (which is not to say that I want EWTN commentators to desist from criticizing any politicians of either party who trumpet their Catholicism while still voting anti-life). I don’t think we should be lumping together, say, a “softer” approach to illegal aliens with things like hiding the tabernacle in a side closet or “consecrating” Oreo cookies or praying the “Our Mother” or stuff like that.

Still, this is a minor complaint. I love EWTN – I watch it (or have it on as I work) pretty much all the time. It has been the main means by which the Lord has been changing my life. Without watching it so much, I doubt I would have gotten the restlessness to live out my faith which has led me to become active in my parish (and no longer just a spectator).
 
I enjoy ewtn, and I watch it a lot or have it on while I am doing something else. I have never noticed anything being wrong with it.
 
I see old slewfoot at work again. Anytime you have something good he will be right in the middle of it and this is no exception. I credit EWTN for bringing me back into the Church and I can’t say enough good about it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top