P
Protokletos
Guest
I was wondering what the process generally consisted of for receiving an Orthodox Christian into either the Latin Rite or Eastern Rite Catholic Church? Also, has this process changed after Vatican II?
Why is it difficult for Eastern Catholics?You need to make a profession of faith and a priest receives you as coming into communion with the Bishop of Rome.
Also, you should be ascribed to the Eastern Catholic Church counterpart of your Orthodox Church. If you wish to become Roman Catholic, then you would need to ask for a canonical transfer (although difficult for Eastern Catholics, I believe the process could be easier for Orthodox coming into communion with the Catholics).
The Roman Church wants to restore the prominence of the Eastern Churches. Since those are diminishing more, it is harder to leave one and join the Roman Church.Why is it difficult for Eastern Catholics?
For the Latin Rite:I was wondering what the process generally consisted of for receiving an Orthodox Christian into either the Latin Rite or Eastern Rite Catholic Church? Also, has this process changed after Vatican II?
Over 98% of Catholics are Roman Catholics. Rome wants to preserve the numbers of Eastern Catholics who will bear the traditions of the East, or at least carry the canonical right to demand for their Rite. Thus they made it easier for Catholics to ask to move their canonical ascription to the East than for one who is Eastern to move to the West.Why is it difficult for Eastern Catholics?
Although that has never stopped many Eastern Catholics to become practicing Roman Catholics.Recently, in the middle east, the Church has asked the eastern Catholics to attend their proper ritual Church. Transfers between eastern Catholic churches as well as to the the Latin Catholic Church have been denied. Also denied are Latin Catholic to eastern Catholic Church. These denials (by the Congregation for Eastern Churches) have even occurred when both bishops agreed to the transfer.
True, some of the eastern faithful ignore CCEO 40.3 “Other Christian faithful are also to foster an understanding and appreciation of their own rite, and are held to observe it everywhere unless something is excused by the law.” And they also do not have the rights in the Latin Church that they have in their ascribed Church sui iuris.Although that has never stopped many Eastern Catholics to become practicing Roman Catholics.
They have the right to demand that a mission parish be set up for them and invite a priest of their own rite to celebrate the Liturgy.True, some of the eastern faithful ignore CCEO 40.3 “Other Christian faithful are also to foster an understanding and appreciation of their own rite, and are held to observe it everywhere unless something is excused by the law.” And they also do not have the rights in the Latin Church that they have in their ascribed Church sui iuris.
For example, the eastern Catholic in a Latin parish when they are not placed in the care of the parish, do not have the right to demand the Divine Liturgy in the form of their ritual church.
From their proper ordinary.They have the right to demand that a mission parish be set up for them and invite a priest of their own rite to celebrate the Liturgy.
According to canon law Orthodox are ascribed as members of the eastern Catholic Church closest to their ritual Orthodox Church, even if received into the Catholic Church at a Latin Church by Latin clergy.I was wondering what the process generally consisted of for receiving an Orthodox Christian into either the Latin Rite or Eastern Rite Catholic Church? Also, has this process changed after Vatican II?